长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (05): 1046-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202505011

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

前景理论视角下多元主体环境协同治理的演化博弈分析

裴潇,董艳秋,罗森   

  1. (长江大学经济与管理学院,湖北 荆州 434023)
  • 出版日期:2025-05-20 发布日期:2025-05-22

Evolutionary Game Analysis of Multi-subjects Environmental Collaborative Governance from the Perspective of Prospect Theory

PEI Xiao,DONG Yan-qiu,LUO Sen    


  1. (School of Economic and Management,Yangtze University,Jingzhou 434023,China)
  • Online:2025-05-20 Published:2025-05-22

摘要: 构建多元主体环境协同治理体系是推进中国式现代化的重要举措。基于前景理论,建立了“政府-企业-公众”的动态演化博弈模型,深入分析了环境协同治理中多元主体的策略选择和决策机制,并通过MATLAB软件进行数值仿真实验,揭示了博弈方初始意愿、奖惩力度、风险偏好系数和损失规避系数等因素对环境协同治理效果的影响。研究发现:(1)博弈主体的决策行为不仅受自身策略的影响,还受其他方策略的制约,并能在特定条件下实现均衡;(2)尽管博弈方初始意愿和政府奖惩力度会影响系统演化速度,但这些因素不会改变最终的策略选择,系统将稳定地演化至理想状态;(3)感知价值函数中的风险偏好系数与损失规避系数对系统稳定策略有显著影响,提高博弈主体对奖惩的感知价值是实现最优均衡的关键。

Abstract: Building an environmental collaborative governance system involving multiple subjects is a significant measure to promote Chinese-style modernization. This paper constructed a dynamic evolutionary game model of "government-enterprise-public", based on perspective of prospect theory. This study analyzed the strategy selection and decision-making mechanisms of multi-subjects in environmental governance. Through numerical simulation experiments using MATLAB software, this paper revealed how factors such as the initial intentions of the players, the intensity of rewards and punishments, risk preference coefficients, and loss aversion coefficients affected the effectiveness of environmental collaborative governance. These findings indicated that:(1)The decision-making behavior of game players was influenced by their own and others' strategy selection and reached an equilibrium state under certain conditions.(2)Although the initial intentions of game players and the strength of governmental rewards and punishments affected the speed of system evolution, these factors did not change the final strategy selection, and the system evolved stably towards an ideal state.(3)The coefficients of risk preference and loss aversion in the perceived utility function significantly affected stable strategies in system evolution, which enhanced game players' perception of the value of rewards. Punishments were crucial for achieving optimal equilibrium.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 宏,蔡伟民,王万贤,杨建民. 生态工程中群落模型植物灭螺机理研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 117 -122 .
[2] 傅春, 欧阳莹, 陈炜. 环鄱阳湖区水足迹的动态变化评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(12): 1520 .
[3] 王永艳 |李阳 |何太蓉. 平行岭谷区都市城郊耕地景观演变案例研究——以重庆市沙坪坝区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(08): 1027 .
[4] 吴 晓|吴宜进. 基于灰色关联模型的山地城市生态安全动态评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(03): 385 .
[5] 王亚力,吴云超,赵 迪,熊建新. 基于流动人口特征的环洞庭湖区县域城镇化的水平和性质分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(11): 1519 .
[6] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[7] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[8] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[9] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[10] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .