长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (05): 1062-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202505012

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长潭水库小流域地表水质对景观格局的响应特征及尺度效应研究

邹奕巧1,赵钿钿2,3,马桂莲4,吴江4,林雪锋1,盖旭2,张涵丹2*,陈光才2   

  1. (1台州市国土空间整治与生态修复中心,浙江 台州 318000;2中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所,杭州 311400;3东北林业大学,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150000; 4台州市黄岩区林业技术推广总站,浙江 台州 318020)
  • 出版日期:2025-05-20 发布日期:2025-05-22

Study on the Response Characteristics and Scale Effects of Surface Water Quality to Landscape Patterns in the Small Watershed of Changtan Reservoir 

ZOU Yi-qiao1, ZHAO Tian-tian2,3, MA Gui-lian4, WU Jiang4, LIN Xue-feng1, GAI Xu2, ZHANG Han-dan2, CHEN Guang-cai2 #br#   

  1. (1.Taizhou National Land Space Improvement and Ecological Restoration Center, Taizhou 318000, China; 2.Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China; 3.Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150000, China; 4.Forestry Technology Promotion Station of Huangyan District, Taizhou 318020, China)
  • Online:2025-05-20 Published:2025-05-22

摘要: 水质对土地利用和景观格局的变化较为敏感,为探究不同尺度下的景观格局与水质之间的关系,研究以长潭水库为例,基于2021年水质监测数据,对各入库支流以100m为间隔进行缓冲区划分,计算50 ~ 650 m7个带状缓冲区的景观特征,并采用Pearman相关分析和冗余分析对水质与景观格局的响应关系进行研究。结果表明:(1)库区小流域以林地为主,耕地和水体次之;林地面积占比随着缓冲半径的增加而增加,耕地和建设用地相反。(2)耕地、建设用地、蔓延度指数(CONTAG)和香农多样性指数(SHDI)与水质指标呈正相关关系,其中耕地是库区水质污染的重要来源;(3)景观格局对水质的解释率在250m半径最高。在该范围内,景观破碎化程度高,人类活动最为强烈。建议在各支流250 m范围内严格控制耕地的耕种模式,通过建设河岸缓冲带、水库前置库等方法来提高对污染物的拦截能力,从而保护库区小流域的水环境安全。

Abstract: Water quality is sensitive to the changes in land use and landscape patterns. To explore the relationship between landscape patterns and water quality at different scales, Changtan Reservoir watershed was chosen as the research object. Based on 2021 water quality monitoring data, buffer zones were divided at intervals of 100m for each inlet tributary. The landscape characteristics of seven strip-shaped buffer zones ranging from 50 to 650m were calculated. Pearman correlation analysis and redundancy analysis were used to study the response relationship between water quality and landscape patterns. The results showed that: (1) The watershed of the reservoir was primarily composed of forest land, followed by arable land and water bodies. The proportion of forest land area increased with the buffer radius, while the proportion of arable land and construction land areas decreased. (2) Arable land, construction land, Contagion Index (CONTAG), and Shannon Diversity Index (SHDI) were positively correlated with water quality indicators, with arable land being a significant source of water pollution in the reservoir area. (3) The explanatory power of landscape pattern on water quality was highest at a 250m radius. Within this range, the landscape fragmentation was high, and the human activities were intense. It is recommended to strictly control farming practices within 250 meters of each tributary. Approaches including the establishment of riparian buffers and the construction of pre-reservoirs should be implemented to enhance the interception of pollutants, and to protect the water environment safety of the Changtan Reservoir watershed. 

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 项小燕, 吴甘霖, 段仁燕, 王志高, 张中信, 王广艳, 张小平. 大别山五针松种群结构及动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 55 -62 .
[2] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[3] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[4] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[5] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[6] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[7] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[8] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[9] 佘颖, 刘耀彬. 国内外绿色发展制度演化的历史脉络及启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[10] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .