长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (1): 181-190.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202501014

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉江生态经济带绿色基础设施时空演化及格局特征分析

何鹏飞1,2,陈昆仑1,2*   

  1. (1.中国地质大学(武汉)环境学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2.中国地质大学(武汉)体育学院,湖北 武汉 430074)
  • 出版日期:2025-01-20 发布日期:2025-01-24

Analysis of Spatiotemporal Evolution and Pattern Characteristics of Green Infrastructure of the Hanjiang Ecological Economic Zone in China

HE Peng-fei1,2, CHEN Kun-lun1,2   

  1. (1.School of Environmental Studies , China University of Geosciences , Wuhan 430074 , China;2.School of Physical Education, China University of Geosciences , Wuhan 430074 , China)
  • Online:2025-01-20 Published:2025-01-24

摘要:  绿色基础设施(Green Infrastructure, GI)可以为城市和居民提供多功能的生态系统服务,而成为解决城市问题的新途径。以汉江生态经济带为研究区,采用形态学空间格局分析方法、景观指数法以及最小累积阻力模型,构建了2010~2020年3个时期的GI网络,以分析其时空演化特征。研究表明:(1)近10 a来,研究区GI景观总面积约占研究区总面积的58%,并以年均2.6‰的速度持续增长,呈现积极的生态改善趋势。在GI景观中,核心区面积约占86.08%;(2)城市周边的GI景观因城市扩张受到显著影响,面积持续萎缩,结构趋于简化,保护与修复工作面临严峻挑战;(3)综合阻力值自西北向东南递减,且高阻力地区呈现不断扩张的趋势。基于阻力面识别的潜在廊道,主要分布在汉江上游地区,其数量从负增长8.70%到正增长63.64%,生态节点则连续增长至1916个,表明汉江上游地区的景观破碎化现象仍未有效遏制;(4)GI网络格局呈现“局部连通,整体松散”的特征,极大地限制了物种扩散和能量流动的范围,GI源地数量和面积是网络格局优化的关键。

Abstract: As a new way to solve urban problems, Green Infrastructure (GI) can provide multifunctional ecosystem services to cities and their inhabitants.Taking the Hanjiang Ecological Economic Zone as the study area, the paper adopts the methods of morphological spatial pattern analysis(MSPA), landscape index method and minimum cumulative resistance model (MCR) to construct the GI network from 2010 to 2020 to reveal its temporal and spatial evolution.The following conclusions can be made.(1) In the past ten years, the total area of GI landscapes in the research zone accounted for about 58% of the total area of the research zone with annual average growth rate of 2.6‰ and it will continue to increase.Among them, the core area occupied about 86.08% of the total area of GI landscape.(2) The GI landscape around the city was severely affected by urban expansion.Its area was continually shrinking and the structure tended to be simplified.Thereby, we meet great challenges to protect and restore it.(3) The comprehensive resistance value decreased from northwest to southeast, while the high-resistance area showed a continuous trend of expansion.The potential corridor constructed on resistance was densely distributed in the middle and upper reaches of Hanjiang, whose number has increased from 8.70% of negative growth to 63.64% of positive growth.Moreover, the number of ecological nodes have continuously increased to 1,916, which reflected the fragmentation phenomenon in the upper reach was not effectively stopped.(4) The network structure presented a pattern of “local connectivity and overall looseness”, which greatly limited the scope of species dispersion and energy flow.The number and area of GI sources were the key to network structure optimization.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 嵇涛|杨华|何太蓉. 重庆主城区建设用地扩展的时空特征及驱动因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(01): 60 .
[2] 张婷, 蔡海生, 张学玲. 基于碳足迹的江西省农田生态系统碳源/汇时空差异[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(06): 767 .
[3] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[4] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[5] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[6] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[7] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[8] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[9] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[10] 佘颖, 刘耀彬. 国内外绿色发展制度演化的历史脉络及启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .