长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (11): 2377-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202511001

• 区域可持续发展 •    下一篇

长江经济带生态建设领域减污降碳协同效应时空演化特征及影响因素

邢文婷,李利娟,刘明珠   

  1. (重庆工商大学管理科学与工程学院,重庆 400067)

  • 出版日期:2025-11-20 发布日期:2025-11-20

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Synergy Between Pollution and Carbon Reduction in the Ecological Construction Area of the Yangtze River Economic Belt

XING Wen-ting,LI Li-juan,LIU Ming-zhu   

  1. (School of Management Science and Engineering,Chongqing Technology and Business University,Chongqing 400067,China)
  • Online:2025-11-20 Published:2025-11-20

摘要:  剖析生态建设领域减污降碳协同效应空间差异及影响因素是引导区域协同共治的前提,是实现“双碳”目标愿景,推进美丽中国建设的重要内容。综合运用CRITIC权重法、修正的耦合协调模型、标准差椭圆、泰尔指数及双向固定效应模型对2010~2022年长江经济带生态建设领域减污降碳协同效应的时空演化特征、地区差异及影响因素进行分析。结果表明:(1)2010~2022年,长江经济带11个省市生态建设领域减污降碳协同水平整体呈上升态势,协同等级从轻度不协同逐步转变为良好协同;(2)减污降碳协同水平具有显著的空间异质性,整体呈“东北—西南”空间分布格局,分布重心呈“西南-东北”向交互折返迁移的趋势;(3)减污降碳协同水平区域总体差异呈先下降后上升再下降的趋势,区域间差异小于区域内差异,区域间差异整体表现为“中游>下游>上游”;(4)能耗强度、经济发展、科技创新、产业结构与政府环境保护力度对减污降碳协同水平影响程度依次减弱,其中能耗强度、经济发展对二者协同水平提升表现为负向约束作用,科技创新、产业结构和政府环境保护力度对其表现为正向促进作用。

Abstract: Analyzing the spatial differences and influencing factors of synergistic effects in pollution reduction and carbon mitigation within the ecological construction domain is a prerequisite for guiding regional collaborative governance. It is also a crucial component in achieving the "dual carbon" goals and advancing the construction of a beautiful China. This study employed a comprehensive analysis using the CRITIC weight method,an adjusted coupling coordination model,standard deviational ellipse,Theil index,and a two-way fixed effects model to examine the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics,regional disparities,and the influencing factors from 2010 to 2022. The results indicated that: (1) The overall level of synergy in pollution reduction and carbon mitigation showed an upward trend,with the coordination level gradually shifting from mildly uncoordinated to well-coordinated. (2) The synergy level in pollution reduction and carbon mitigation exhibited significant spatial heterogeneity,with an overall "northeast-southwest" spatial distribution pattern. The distribution center showed a trend of reciprocating migration from southwest to northeast. (3) The overall regional difference in the synergy level first decreased,then increased,and subsequently decreased again. The inter-regional differences were smaller than intra-regional differences,with the overall inter-regional differences manifesting as "midstream > downstream > upstream". (4) The degree of impact on the synergy level was in the order of energy consumption intensity,economic development,technological innovation,industrial structure,and government environmental protection efforts. Among these factors,energy consumption intensity and economic development exerted a negative constraining effect on the improvement of the synergy level,while technological innovation,industrial structure,and government environmental protection efforts had a positive promoting effect.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!