长江流域资源与环境 >> 2013, Vol. 22 >> Issue (01): 118-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    

中国区域环境质量动态综合评价——基于污染排放视角

袁晓玲|李政大|刘伯龙   

  1. (西安交通大学经济与金融学院|陕西 西安 710061)
  • 出版日期:2013-01-20

DYNAMIC COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY FOR CHINA——BASED ON POLLUTION EMISSIONS

YUAN Xiaoling, LI Zhengda|LIU Bolong   

  1. (School of Economics and Finance| Xi′an Jiaotong University|Xi′an 710061,China)
  • Online:2013-01-20

摘要:

中国经济取得举世瞩目成就的同时,也付出了沉重的环境代价,环境污染不仅造成了巨大的经济损失,还严重制约了社会的全面发展。科学评价我国环境质量的现状,是改善环境质量的前提,对可持续发展而言具有重要的现实意义。从空气、水、废弃物、垃圾、噪声、土壤等6个方面构建包含11个指标的环境质量综合评价体系,采用基于整体差异驱动的“纵横向拉开档次”评价方法,从不同角度对全国30个省区2003~2010年的环境质量进行动态综合评价,结果显示:从环境总量视角评价,西部最好;从经济发展的环境代价视角评价,东部最小;从人均污染物排放视角评价,西部最多。本文还借鉴经济学的收敛性检验方法,研究中国区域环境质量的内在演变规律。在此基础上,为我国节能减排、可持续发展提出政策建议

Abstract:

Although reform and opening up in China over the past 30 years has made remarkable economic achievements,China pay heavy ecological and environmental costs.Environmental pollution not only causes huge economic losses,but also severely restricts the comprehensive development of society.Therefore,scientific evaluation of the status quo of the environmental quality in different region of China is the premise of improving environment quality.It’s the foundation to construct resourcesaving and environmentfriendly society.
The issue,from the six dimensions of air,water,waste,garbage,noise,soil and so on,constructed a comprehensive evaluation system for environmental quality which contained 11 indicators(carbon dioxide emissions;industrial waste gas emission;the total emission of sulfur dioxide emissions;soot emissions;industrial dust emission;industrial waste water discharge;sewage discharge;industrial solid wastes discharged;noise level;living garbage transport volume;the amount of chemical fertilizer) and employed a evaluation method called “vertical and horizontal scatter” based on the overall differences.From different perspectives,this paper also evaluated the environmental quality synthetically and dynamically for over 30 provinces and regions during 20032010,and tested the convergence to study its internal evolution.The results are as follows.(1)From the perspective of environment pollution(ENindex1),the environment quality of the West was the best,the East was better than the Middle,but the index of pollution in the West showed the tendency of rising.(2)From the perspective of environment cost for economic development(ENindex2),the East was the lowest and occupied the first,the Middle was second,and the West was the worst.Shanxi,Qinghai,Guagnxi,Neimenggu were the most environmental cost regions,while Beijing,Shanghai,Tianjin,Guangdong were the least environmental cost provinces.(3) From the perspective of per capita pollution emission(ENindex3),the East was the least and occupied the first,the Middle was second.The West was the worst and rose since 2008.(4) It was different for σ convergence.There was divergent of ENindex1 in overall country,the East,the Middle and the West,but was convergent since 2005.ENindex2 was convergent since 2007 in the East and the Middle.ENindex3 was convergent in the East and the Middle,but the overall country was divergent.(5)In the test results of absolute β convergence,ENindex1 was convergent in overall country,but ENindex2 and ENindex3 were not.The ENindex1,ENindex2 and ENindex3 in overall country were not club convergence.The ENindex1,ENindex2 and ENindex3 were club convergent in the Middle since 2007.The ENindex1 was club convergent in the West,but the others were divergent.(6) As for the tests of conditional  β convergence,ENindex1 and ENindex2 in overall country were convergent,the ENindex3 was divergent.The pattern of economic growth and human capital had significant effects on the convergence in ENindex1 of overall country,and human capital was helpful for convergence in ENindex2.All indexes in the East,the Middle and the West were not convergent.
On this basis,this paper could provide some policy suggestions for energy conservation and emission reduction in sustainable development in our country 

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 向悟生, 李先琨, 何成新, 吕仕洪, 陆树华. 石漠化山地复合生态系统评价——以广西平果县龙何屯生态重建示范区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 826 .
[2] 佘之祥. 长江三角洲的发展与外向型经济[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 152 -156 .
[3] 潘竟虎. 近15年来长江源区土地利用变化及其生态环境效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 310 -315 .
[4] 罗璐琴, 周敬宣, 李湘梅. 生态足迹动态预测模型构建与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 440 .
[5] 栾青杉, 孙军. 2005年秋季长江口及其邻近水域浮游植物群集[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 202 .
[6] 郑超磊| 刘苏峡, 舒 畅, 张守红. 泥曲河道内最小生态需水研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 329 .
[7] 胡振鹏, 葛, 刚, 刘成林, 陈伏生, 李, 述. 鄱阳湖湿地植物生态系统结构及湖水位对其影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 597 .
[8] 蔡海生, 肖复明, 张学玲. 基于生态足迹变化的鄱阳湖自然保护区生态补偿定量分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 623 .
[9] 胡传林, 万成炎, 吴生桂, 丁庆秋, 潘磊. 蓝藻水华的成因及其生态控制进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(12): 1471 .
[10] 左倬, 由文辉, 汪冬冬. 上海青浦区不同用地类型河流滨岸带生境及植物群落组成[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(1): 116 .