长江流域资源与环境 >> 2013, Vol. 22 >> Issue (5): 648-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

三峡水库汛末175 m试验蓄水过程对香溪河库湾水环境的影响

熊超军|刘德富 |纪道斌 |胡念三 |张 宇 |陈 洋 |杨正健   

  1. (1.三峡大学三峡库区生态环境教育部工程中心|三峡大学水利与环境学院|湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 湖北工业大学资源与环境学院|湖北 武汉 430068;3. 武汉大学水利水电学院|湖北 武汉 430007
  • 出版日期:2013-05-20

INFLUENCE OF THE 175 m TRIAL IMPOUNDMENT OF THE THREE GORGES RESERVOIR ON WATER ENVIRONMENT IN THE XIANGXI BAY

XIONG Chaojun 1, LIU Defu1,2, JI Daobin 1, HU Niansan 1, ZHANG Yu 1, CHEN Yang 1, YANG Zhengjian3   

  1. (1. Engineering Research Center of Ecoenvironment in Three Gorges Reservoir Region, Ministry of Education, College of Hydraulic &|Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University,Yichang 443002, China;2. College of Resources and Environment,Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China;3. School of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,Wuhan University, Wuhan 430007, China
  • Online:2013-05-20

摘要:

为研究解决三峡库区支流水华问题,实现三峡水库生态调度,需探明现行三峡水库175 m蓄水方案对库区支流水环境的影响。基于2008~2010年三峡水库开展的汛末175m试验性蓄水工作,及香溪河库湾2008~2010年野外监测数据,从库湾水华暴发程度、营养盐水平及水动力特性方面分析了2008~2010年三峡水库汛末175 m试验性蓄水对香溪河库湾水环境的影响。结果表明:分两阶段蓄水时间提前方案有利于库湾中上游上层水体的交换和紊动,降低库湾中上游水体表层营养盐浓度,破坏了浮游植物赖以生存较稳定的环境,抑制藻类的生长,降低水体表层叶绿素a的浓度,减少水华暴发频次、持续时间以及强度,有利于库湾水环境的改善

Abstract:

The Three Gorges Project launched in 1993 and completed in 2008.Since 2006, the water level of the Three Gorges Reservoir reached the predetermined 135 meters,and the Three Gorges Project began to pay dividends this year,playing an important role in flood control,power generation,navigation,water diversion and environmental protection.On November 4,2008,the water level of the Three Gorges Reservoir reached 172.5 meters;on October 29,2009,the water level reached 170.9 meters;on October 26,2010,the water level eventually reached 175 meters.The Yangtze River and its branches of the reservoir area of the Three Gorges began to store water and turned into a reservoir in mid June,2003,and the water level reached 170 meters in 2008.The flow rate of the Yangtze River slowed down after construction of the reservoir.As well as producing electricity,the Three Gorges dam is intended to increase the Yangtze River shipping capacity and reduce the potential for floods downstream by providing flood storage space.The Chinese government regards the project as a historic engineering,social and economic success,with the design of stateoftheart large turbines,and a move toward limiting greenhouse gas emissions.However,the dam flooded archaeological and cultural sites and displaced some 1.3 million people,and is causing significant ecological changes,including an increased risk of landslides and algae bloom.The dam has been a controversial topic both in China and abroad.In order to study the algal bloom of the branch river of the Three Gorges Reservoir and realize ecologic regulation of the Three Gorges reservoir ,the influence of the 175 m trial impoundment of the Three Gorges Reservoir on water environment was conducted.The Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) began to 175 m experimental water storage in 2008-2010.The impoundment scheme of Three Gorges Project(TGP) was different in 2008-2010. The field environmental monitoring data used in this paper was from the XiangXi Bay from 2008 to 2010.This article carried out the analysis from the aspects of water bloom outbreak degree, water quality and hydrodynamic and so on,aftertwards described the influence of the different impoundment scheme of the 175 m trial impoundment of the Three Gorges Reservoir on water environment in the Xiangxi Bay. The results showed that the time of water storage advanced was beneficial to upper water exchange and turbulence of the upstream of Xiangxi Bay(XXB) , reduce the water surface nutrient concentration, destroy the living environment of phytoplankton,restrain the growth of algae, reduce the water surface of chlorophyll a concentration,and decrease water bloom outbreak frequency, duration, and strength. These are beneficial to the improvement of the water environment in Xiangxi Bay

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李宗尧,|杨桂山. 经济快速发展地区生态环境竞争力的评价方法——以安徽沿江地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 124 .
[2] 季永兴. 上海多自然型河流整治实践与探索[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 264 .
[3] 毛战坡,单保庆,彭文启,王洪军. 氮素在河流生态系统中的滞留研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 480 -484 .
[4] 许有鹏,于瑞宏,马宗伟. 长江中下游洪水灾害成因及洪水特征模拟分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 638 -643 .
[5] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[6] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[7] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[8] 黄 峰 魏 浪 李 磊 朱 伟. 乌江干流中上游水电梯级开发水温累积效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 337 .
[9] 胡鸿兴, 张岩岩, 何伟, 田蓉, 钟鑫, 韩世松, 李思思, 王俊杰陈文方, 杨阳, 陈侈, 邓晗, 文英, 崔雅婷, 李茜,  王璇, 彭菁菁, 高鑫, 唐义. 神农架大九湖泥炭藓沼泽湿地对镉(Ⅱ)、铜(Ⅱ)、铅(Ⅱ)、锌(Ⅱ)的净化模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1050 .
[10] 蔡海生, 肖复明, 张学玲. 基于生态足迹变化的鄱阳湖自然保护区生态补偿定量分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 623 .