长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (02): 231-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于灾变理论的盐城市土地生态安全评价研究

王亮|卞正富   

  1. (1中国矿业大学环境与测绘学院|江苏 徐州 220082;2盐城师范学院城市与资源环境学院|江苏 盐城 224051;
    3江苏沿海开发研究院|江苏 盐城 224051)
  • 出版日期:2014-02-20

ASSESSING LAND ECOLOGICAL SECURITY IN YANCHENG CITY 
BASED ON CATASTROPHIC THEORY

WANG Liang1|2|3 |BIAN Zhengfu1   

  1. (1 School of Environment and Spatial Informatics| China University of Mining and Technology|Xuzhou 221008| China;
     2College of City &|Resources and Environment|Yancheng Teachers University| Yancheng 224051|China; 
    3Research Institute of Jiangsu Coastal Development| Yancheng 224051|China)
  • Online:2014-02-20

摘要:

土地生态安全关系到区域的可续发展。以压力状态响应模型与灾变理论相结合,根据盐城市的土地利用特点,分别从社会、经济和生态环境方面构建土地生态安全评价指标体系,分析盐城市2002~2011年的土地生态安全变化情况,找出其中的问题,能为盐城市土地利用可持续发展提供理论依据和参考价值。研究表明:盐城市土地利用生态安全等级除了2003年和2007年为安全等级外,其余8 a均为中等安全、不安全和极不安全等级,而且基本呈逐年下降趋势;人口、环保投入和城镇化是导致盐城市土地利用生态安全等级下降的重要影响因素,这种现实状况应该引起政府相关决策部门的高度重视,最后提出了几点建议

Abstract:

 Land is the foundation ofglobal survival and development Land ecological security is related to regional sustainable development The land ecosystem plays a very important role in socialeconomic progress at regional, national, and international scale The land ecosystems of Yancheng city have become highly stressed and dysfunctional due to the continuous, excessive exploitation and utilization of land resources In this regard, there is considerable need for methods and indicators to diagnose the state of land ecosystem for prompting ecological restoration, management and regulation A catastrophic model for land ecological security assessment combined with the pressurestateresponse (PSR) model framework was developed in this paper to overcome the disadvantages in subjectivity and complexity of the currently used assessment methods Based on the actual land use in Yancheng city, the paper established the ecological security of land index system from perspectives of economy, society and ecological environment The catastrophic assessment index system was divided into hierarchical subsystems under the pressurestateresponse framework The catastrophe model integrated multiple assessment indices of land ecological security according to the inherent contradictions and relative importance of indices without calculating weights Specifically, membership degree of higher level index was calculated based on the membership degrees of lower level indices that were subjective to suitable model, such as cusp, fold, swallowtail and butterfly model The purpose of this paper is to judge the degree of land ecological security in Yancheng city from 2002 to 2011 via catastrophic theory and PSR model and find the inherent issues to make sure of sustainable development of this region The results showed that among the ten years, the value of pressure, state, response and synthetic about land ecological security was evaluated as safe in the year of 2003 and 2007, then in the year of 2002 and during 2004-2006 was at middle level, then the degree of land ecological security during 2008-2009 was insecure and very insecure from 2011 to 2012, which showed that ecological security level and circumstance of land use in Yancheng city continually decreased During this period, the land use pattern of Yancheng was under the tremendous pressure from the conflict between the rapid urbanization, economic development and the conservation and rehabilitation of ecoenvironment All these imply that land ecosystem conditions are not optimistic for Yancheng city and such situation should draw the high attention of related government departments There are some factors that demographic, the invest ration to protect environment and urbanization rate has the most important influence on the land ecological security of Yancheng city Generally, The calculation procedure presented in this paper does not require a high level of technical expertise to determine the membership degree, making it simple and operational Being applicable to similar land ecosystems, the catastrophic model is thus believed to provide an alternative approach to land ecosecurity assessment This paper emphasized the impacts of human activity on land ecological security of Yancheng city and put forward suggestions concerning the adjustment or optimization of land use pattern and improvement of the technical system for ecosecurity assessment based on regional overall planning from 2011 to 2030, which would have wide application prospective in the future

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李崇明,黄真理. 三峡水库入库污染负荷研究(Ⅱ)——蓄水后污染负荷预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 97 -106 .
[2] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[3] 李 佳,李思悦,谭 香,张全发. 南水北调中线工程总干渠沿线经过河流水质评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 693 .
[4] 邹丽敏, 王 超, 冯士龙. 玄武湖沉积物中重金属污染的潜在生物毒性风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 280 .
[5] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[6] 陈 爽,王 进,. 太湖流域城市化水平及外来人口影响测评[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 524 -529 .
[7] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[8] 张文广,胡远满, 刘 淼,杨兆平,常 禹,李秀珍,杨 孟,问青春, . 基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值损益估算——以岷江上游地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 821 .
[9] 李贵祥,孟广涛,方向京,郭立群,柴 勇,和丽萍,张正海. 云南金沙江流域主要森林植被类型分布格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 51 .
[10] 冯新灵,罗隆诚,邱丽丽,. 成都未来气候变化趋势的R/S分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 83 .