长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (06): 809-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201406009

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于产能核算和空间聚类的县级基本农田划定研究

聂艳,吴学敏,何颖,于婧,于雷,姜艳,周勇   

  1. (1华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院,湖北 武汉 430079;2 香港中文大学地理与资源管理系,香港;

    3 湖北大学资源环境学院,湖北 武汉 430062)
  • 出版日期:2014-06-20

DEMARCATION METHOD OF PRIME FARMLAND BASED #br# ON PRODUCTIVITY AND SPATIAL CLUSTERING

NIE Yan1,WU Xuemin1,SYLVIA Y H2,YU Jing3,YU Lei1,JIANG Yan1,ZHOU Yong1   

  1. (1 College of Urban & Environment Sciences,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China;
    2 Department of Geography & Resource Management,The Chinese University of Hong Kong,NT,Hong Kong,China;
    3 College of Resources & Environment,Hubei University,Wuhan 430062,China)
  • Online:2014-06-20

摘要:

为了实现基本农田划定过程中的质优、集中并重的目标,以鹤峰县为例,结合产能核算、空间聚类、景观破碎度指数等方法探讨构建了一种基本农田划定的新方法。首先基于耕地地形条件、水利设施、产能状况、建设占用可能性和规划约束构建了5个因素12个因子的指标体系和域值型、空间扩散型的指标属性标准化方法以表征研究区耕地质量的空间差异;然后结合空间距离邻近度和景观破碎度指数修正K均值空间聚类法的空间距离和分类数两个参数,通过分析各分类数和耕地破碎度指数的变化趋势、耕地破碎度指数变化率与图斑最小面积的关系确定最佳分类数和最小剔除图斑面积;经K均值空间聚类再结合上级下达鹤峰县基本农田指标确定入选基本农田的耕地面积为16 17235 hm2,质量指数均大于73分,景观破碎度指数为126,实现基本农田划定的质优、集中。其结果为基本农田保护规划理论体系的完善和实际工作的深入开展提供参考和借鉴

Abstract:

 Farmland protection is the foundation of national food security and social stability In China,rapid industrialization and urbanization has catalyzed farmland resource deterioration To assure a stable supply of farmland,we need a comprehensive plan In a longterm food production plan,both quantity and quality of land are important Prime farmland,which is defined as highquality farmland in terms of fertility,location,and equipped irrigation system,is the most critical category of farmland as it can guarantee stable grain productivity Due to its important role in food production in China,prime farmland should be reserved for agricultural use and thus requires continual monitoring and defragmentation Conventional demarcation method of prime farmland planning,which has set a target in both quantity and quality of the farmland,often overlooks the productivity and location aspects,and thus has resulted in suboptimal efficiency This paper aims to explore new demarcation method of prime farmland based on productivity and spatial clustering To describe farmland quality,indexes for each land unit are constructed by three elements that consist of twelve factors These factors,according to their attributes,can be categorized into productivity and spatial diffusion type As each indicator has a value on a different scale,to eliminate the scale effect,the value of each indicator is normalized,based on which a comprehensive value is calculated for each land unit by weightadding models The comprehensive values of each unit are then used to describe the spatial differences of farmland quality in a region We use Kmeans spatial clustering method and landscape fragmentation measure in the defragmentation process The Kmeans spatial clustering method reduces fragmentation by accounting for both spatial proximity and attribute similarity of the land units The optimal number of land categories can be determined by the point where the marginal reduction in the fragmentation index is maximized as the number of categories varies Once the optimal category of farmland is found,the landscape fragmentation index can be calculated The value of this index changes depending on the minimum size of defragmented areas,the optimum of which corresponds to the largest marginal reduction in the fragmentation index We apply our demarcation method in Hefeng County,Hubei Province,China The resulting defragmented prime farmland in the county encompasses an area of 1617235 hm2 and the associated comprehensive quality indexes are all above 73 The fragmentation index is 126,which is significantly lower compared to the values obtained from the other two conventional methods This study can serve as a reference for future theoretical and empirical research on prime farmland

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李崇明,黄真理. 三峡水库入库污染负荷研究(Ⅱ)——蓄水后污染负荷预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 97 -106 .
[2] 贾泽露,. GIS与SDM集成构建土地定级专家信息系统的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 323 .
[3] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[4] 谢 洪,钟敦伦,李 泳,韦方强. 长江上游泥石流灾害的特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 94 -99 .
[5] 王云琦,王玉杰,朱金兆. 重庆缙云山典型林分林地土壤抗蚀性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 775 -780 .
[6] 曹 昀,王国祥. 水生高等植物对悬浮泥沙的去除研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 340 .
[7] 周廷刚,张其良. 长江上游水土流失成因及治理模式研究——以重庆市城口县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 89 -93 .
[8] 况润元 周云轩 李行 田波. 崇明东滩鸟类生境适宜性空间模糊评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 229 -233 .
[9] 王青, 李富程, 李国蓉, 慕长龙. 基于“压力状态响应”框架的长江上游防护林健康评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(8): 953 .
[10] 肖艳, 黎祖贤, 章新平, 周建君. 近48年来湘江流域极端降水事件特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(11): 1356 .