长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (07): 985-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201407013

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于村级尺度的湖南农村水贫困比较研究

杨玉蓉,张青山,邹 君   

  1. (衡阳师范学院资源环境与旅游管理系,湖南 衡阳 421008)
  • 出版日期:2014-07-20

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HUNAN RURAL WATER POVERTY BASED ON VILLAGE SCALE

YANG Yurong,ZHANG Qingshan,ZOU Jun   

  1. (Resourse Environment and Tourism Management Department,Hengyang Normal University,Hengyang 421008,China)
  • Online:2014-07-20

摘要:

为综合评价湖南农村水贫困现状,找出有效应对措施,以国外最新的水贫困理论为依据,构建湖南农村水贫困评价指标体系;通过实地调查和访谈获取并整理出湖南3种地貌类型区6个行政村的水贫困评价数据;采用非均衡法测算水贫困状况并分析其驱动因素。结果表明:湖南农村水贫困具有明显的地域分异现象,即湘西山区最为严重,RWPI值均小于20;湘北洞庭湖平原区最弱,其值在55~56之间;而湘中丘陵区介于其间。不同地区水贫困各系统的综合得分不同,只有提高且均衡各系统的综合得分才能有效减轻地区水贫困程度。供水设施欠佳、利用能力偏低是地区间水贫困状况不同的主要驱动因素,而水资源状况是其次要驱动因素;农村环境问题和低效用水是省内各村水贫困评价的短板,因此地区水贫困是区域水资源自然禀赋与社会经济发展的综合结果。针对评价结果,提出了发展农村经济、提高综合实力、做好环保工作和提高用水效率等措施应对农村水贫困问题,可为新农村建设中的水资源管理提供新思路

Abstract:

Evaluation of water poverty is a new angle of view and method to estimate the water resources synthetically.In order to evaluate the present situation of rural water poverty in Hunan Province comprehensively, and find out the effective measures, this paper is based on the theory of water poverty which is the latest foreign theory.We structured water poverty index system of Hunan rural firstly, after that acquired and organized 6 villages data in 3 types of terrain area which is required for water poverty assessment by field investigation and interview.Finally, a nonequilibrium method was applied to calculate the water poverty value in 6 villages, and analyzed its driving factors.The results show that the water poverty in Hunan rural has obvious regional differentiation, implying that the mountain area of the northwest Hunan is the most serious area.Their value of RWPI are both less than 20; while RWPI value in the plain area of northern Dongting Lake is 55-56, stating that their water poverty is weakened clearly.And water poverty degree in hilly area of central Hunan is between above two areas.The comprehensive score of water poverty in each system is different from other regions, in other words, the contribution rate to water poverty assessment is also different.So its the only way that comprehensive score of every system is improved and balanced to reduce the area of water poverty degree effectively.Poor water supply facilities and low capacity of using water are the main driving factors, and the situation of water resources is their secondary driving factors  leading to diverse degree of water poverty in different regions.Rural environmental problems and inefficient utilization of water in Hunan different villages both are short plate or common driving factors of its water poverty assessment.On the one hand, landform types influence the level of regional economic development and the distribution of natural water resources.On the other hand, regional economic development level has effect on its water supply facilities, capacity utilization of water resources, status of the water environment and water use efficiency.Therefore, area water poverty is the result of a complex of regional water resource natural endowment and the development of society and economy.According to the results of evaluation, some suggestions is put forward to lighten rural poverty problem.One is to overcome the natural development of resistance, speed up economic and social development and enhance comprehensive strength of the rural.Another one is to pay attention to environmental problems, do a good job in environmental protection and ensure the safety of rural drinking water.In addition, it is an effective measure as well for mitigating water poverty degree to raise awareness of water conservation and develop watersaving agriculture.All above measures can provide a new idea for water resources management in the new rural construction

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[3] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[4] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[5] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[6] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[7] 张代钧,许丹宇,任宏洋,曹海彬,郑 敏,刘惠强. 长江三峡水库水污染控制若干问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 605 -610 .
[8] 黄 峰 魏 浪 李 磊 朱 伟. 乌江干流中上游水电梯级开发水温累积效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 337 .
[9] 胡鸿兴, 张岩岩, 何伟, 田蓉, 钟鑫, 韩世松, 李思思, 王俊杰陈文方, 杨阳, 陈侈, 邓晗, 文英, 崔雅婷, 李茜,  王璇, 彭菁菁, 高鑫, 唐义. 神农架大九湖泥炭藓沼泽湿地对镉(Ⅱ)、铜(Ⅱ)、铅(Ⅱ)、锌(Ⅱ)的净化模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1050 .
[10] 王肇磊, 贺新枝. 晚清时期湖北自然灾害的治理及其经验教训[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1080 .