长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (04): 625-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201504013

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

青藏高原东南部及其邻近地区FY2E卫星晴空大气可降水量评估

闵文彬1,李宾2,彭骏1,罗清1   

  1. 1.中国气象局成都高原气象研究所,四川 成都 610071;2.四川省气象科技服务中心,四川 成都 610071
  • 出版日期:2015-04-20

EVALUATION OF TOTAL PRECIPITABLE WATER DERIVED FROM FY2E SATELLITE DATA OVER THE SOUTHEAST OF TIBETAN PLATEAU AND ITS ADJACENT AREAS

MIN Wenbin1, LI Bin2, PENG Jun1, LUO Qing1   

  1. 1. Institute of Plateau Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Chengdu 610071, China;2. Sichuan Meteorological Science and Technology Service Center, Chengdu 610071, China
  • Online:2015-04-20

摘要:

为了解青藏高原东南部及邻近地区FY2E卫星大气可降水量(FY2E TPW)的可靠性,利用2010~2012年探空计算值(RS TPW)对其进行对比分析。结果表明:青藏高原地区月平均FY2E TPW除7月偏小外,其余月份都偏大,相对偏差仅有6月和7月在25%以内,其余月份都在50%以上,尤其是1月高达78045%,FY2E TPW与RS TPW之间为负相关系数, FY2E TPW在青藏高原地区不可靠;低海拔地区,6月和7月平均FY2E TPW偏小,其余月份都偏大,5~8月相对偏差不足4%,但1月相对偏差却高达10584%;低海拔地区4~10月,FY2E TPW与RS TPW相关系数大于05,FY2E TPW订正模型估计标准误差为657 mm,个别站点误差较大,还有待进一步的改进。

Abstract:

In order to understand the reliability of total precipitable water vapor (TPW) derived from FY2E satellite data over the Southeast of Tibetan Plateau and its adjacent areas, FY2E TPWs are compared with the radiosonde (RS) TPWs during the period from 2010-2012. The results show that over the Tibetan Plateau the average monthly FY2E TPWs are larger than RS TPWs except in July. The relative errors are less than 25% in June and July and more than 50% in other months, especially in January as high as 78045%. The correlation coefficient between FY2E TPW and RS TPW is negative. Over the low altitudes the average monthly FY2E TPWs are larger than RS TPWs in June and July and smaller in other months. The relative errors are less than 4% in May to August, but in January as high as 105.84%. The correlation coefficient is greater than 0.5 during the period from April to October. The linear correction model of FY2E TPW with a standard error of 6.57 mm could be improved to count error in individual sites.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程 江,何 青,王元叶,刘 红,夏小明. 长江河口细颗粒泥沙絮凝体粒径的谱分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 460 -464 .
[2] 彭 建,景 娟,吴健生,蒋依依,张 源. 乡村产业结构评价——以云南省永胜县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 413 .
[3] 蔡述明. 研究长江中游地区水资源开发利用的新成果[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 100 .
[4] 段学花 王兆印 余国安. 以底栖动物为指示物种对长江流域水生态进行评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 241 -247 .
[5] 王宏巍. 俄罗斯土壤污染防治立法研究及其对构建我国《土壤污染防治法》的启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 326 .
[6] 刘蓓蓓, 李凤英, 俞钦钦, 于洋, 毕军. 长江三角洲城市间环境公平性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1093 .
[7] 吴建楠, 姚士谋, 曹有挥, 王成新. 长江三角洲城市群城乡统筹发展的空间差别化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(z1): 21 .
[8] 师长兴. 长江上游输沙模数分布图的制作及其空间分异特征初步分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(11): 1322 .
[9] 伍学进, 曾菊新. 试论宜居性城市绿地的规划与建设[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(1): 28 .
[10] 施晓晖|徐祥德. 三峡库区来水流量与长江流域上游前期降水的关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(09): 1062 .