长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (07): 1102-1109.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201507004

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于RRM的市级土地利用总体规划生态风险评价

赵源1,2, 黄成敏1   

  1. 1. 四川大学建筑与环境学院, 四川 成都 610065;
    2. 四川省自然资源科学研究院, 四川 成都 610015
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-03 修回日期:2014-07-28 出版日期:2015-07-20
  • 作者简介:赵源(1981~),男,助理研究员,博士研究生,主要研究方向为土地资源利用与管理.E-mail:zhao_yuan@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    四川省应用基础研究计划(2013JY0138);四川省属科研机构基本科研业务费资助项目(2012)

ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF MUNICIPAL-LEVEL LAND-USE MASTER PLANNING BASED ON RELATIVE RISK MODEL

ZHAO Yuan1,2, HUANG Cheng-min1   

  1. 1. College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China;
    2. Sichuan Provincial Institute of Natural Resource Science, Chengdu 610015, China
  • Received:2014-06-03 Revised:2014-07-28 Online:2015-07-20

摘要: 以乐山市土地利用总体规划为研究对象,应用相对风险模型(Relative Risk Model,RRM),对其生态风险进行了分析和评价。评价结果表明,在规划执行期间,全市生态风险总体呈下降趋势,但在区域内的空间分布上却具有不平衡性,局部地区的生态环境会出现波动甚至恶化;作物种植、交通运输和人口负荷是规划生态风险的3个最主要来源;而林地和牧草地在所有生境类型中所受到的生态压力最大;对于生态风险结果,主要表现为区域生态系统及其组分在功能与结构上的损害。研究结果能够为乐山市土地资源开发利用和规划成果的科学决策提供理论依据,同时具有开展区域生态风险防控与管理的参考价值。

关键词: 土地利用总体规划, 生态风险评价, RRM, 乐山市

Abstract: Due to strong human interference, the implementation of land-use master planning (LUMP) will produce a profound impact on the structure and functions of ecosystems. Therefore, in order to avoid the potential threat from the initial decision-making phase, it is essential to introduce and establish an assessment mechanism in the planning to analyze the negative ecological effects on ecosystems and its acceptability. The combination of LUMP and ecological risk is a new research field that present interdisciplinary and challenging characteristics. In view of current development, although its importance has been recognized, quantitative analysis has not yet been conducted, and the depth of the research is actually inadequate. In China, LUMP is characterized by hierarchy. According to the range of administrative districts and decision-making effect, it can be classified into five levels, i.e., national-level, provincial-level, municipal-level, county-level, and town-level. The property, scope, and degree of ecological impact will vary with LUMP at the different levels. Therefore, a corresponding ERA system with planning levels needs to be established to improve the pertinence and operability of evaluation. The aim of this paper is to discuss how to carry out relative risk model (RRM) for the municipal LUMP. By applying the RRM, a relationship of relative risks can be obtained, which is applicable to comparing ecological risk degree among the assessment subdivisions in the study area. With an example, LUMP of Leshan City, which has been completed by the local land department, is investigated for its ecological risk. The city is divided into three units in terms of the topography (southwest mountains area, central valley plain area and northeast hilly area), eight types of habitats (cultivated land, garden land, forested land, grassland, other agricultural land, construction land, water area and natural reserved area), five risk sources (crop planting, livestock breeding, industrial production, transportation construction and population load) and three assessment endpoints (biological species, ecological system and landscape pattern). The evaluation results showed that the general ecological risk of Leshan City is on a downward trend in the planning period. The spatial difference in ecological risk is significant while the basic pattern of ecological risk has not changed after the planning implementation. In some places, the ecological environment will fluctuate and even deteriorate. There are three major sources of ecological risk, including crop planting, transportation construction and population load. The ecological pressure on the forested land and grassland is the most acute among all habitat types. And the damage of structure and function of ecological system is the major forms of risk effect. According to the research achievements, the emphasis of ecological risk prevention and control can be identified, and it can provide references to the practice. In addition, this method is helpful to regional ecological risk analysis. It should be noted that the assessment model presented still has a rise space for promotion, mainly through refining quantitative methods to improve the accuracy. And more research needs to be explored further in the follow-up work to other scale LUMP.

Key words: land-use master planning, ecological risk assessment, RRM, Leshan City

中图分类号: 

  • X826
[1] 陈晓炜,赵世强.土地利用规划的风险管理[J].中国土地科学,2004,18(2):29-33.
[2] 骆东奇,罗光莲,张孝成,等.土地利用规划的生态风险分析[J].生态经济,2005(10):221-224.
[3] 王君仁,许庆福,毛美桥.土地利用规划的风险与控制[J].中国国土资源经济,2008(8):35-37.
[4] CHRISTOU M,GYENES Z,STRUCKL M.Risk assessment in support to land-use planning in Europe:Towards more consistent decisions?[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2011,24:219-26.
[5] TAVEAU J.Risk assessment and land-use planning regulations in France following the AZF disaster[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2010,23:813-23.
[6] LANDIS W G,WIEGERS J A.Design considerations and a suggested approach for regional and comparative ecological risk assessment[J].Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,1997,3(3):287-297.
[7] SUTER G W,VERMIER T,MUNNS W R,et al.Ⅱ Framework for the integration of health and ecological risk assessment[J].Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2003,9(1):281-302.
[8] LANDIS W G.Regional scale ecological risk assessment:using the relative risk model[M].CRC Press,Boca Raton,FL,USA,2005:11-36.
[9] EMILY H H,LANDIS W G.Regional ecological risk assessment of a near shore marine environment:Cherry Point,WA[J].Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2004,10:299-325.
[10] WHELAN M J,DAVENPORT E J,SMITH B G.A globally applicable location-specific screening model for assessing the relative risk of pesticide leaching[J].Science of the Total Environment,2007,377(2-3):192-206.
[11] 王小龙.海岛生态系统风险评价方法及应用研究[D].山东:中国科学院海洋研究所,2006.
[12] OBERY A,LANDIS W G.Application of the relative risk model for Codorus Creek watershed relative ecological risk assessment:An approach for multiple stressors[J].Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2002,8(2):405-428.
[13] WALKER R,LANDIS W G,BROWN P.Developing a regional ecological risk assessment:A case study of a Tasmanian agricultural catchment[J].Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2001,7(2):417-439.
[14] MORAES R,LANDIS W G,MOLANDER S.Regional risk assessment of a Brazilian rainforest reserve[J].Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2002,8(7):1779-1803.
[15] O'BRIEN G C,WEPENER V.Regional-scale risk assessment methodology using the Relative Risk Model (RRM) for surface freshwater aquatic ecosystems in South Africa[J].Water SA,2012,38(2):153-166.
[16] 付光辉.土地整理风险评价研究[D].南京:南京农业大学博士学位论文,2007.
[17] 马禄义,许学工.基于气象灾害的青岛市域生态风险评价[J].城市环境与城市生态,2010,23(4):1-5.
[18] 刘 晓,苏维词,王 铮,等.基于RRM模型的三峡库区重庆开县消落区土地利用生态风险评价[J].环境科学学报,2012,32(1):248-256.
[19] 袁承程,刘黎明,赵 鑫,等.基于相对风险模型的长沙市城郊农业环境风险评价[J].生态与农村环境学报,2013,29(2):158-163.
[20] 张 玮,赵晶晶,高伟明.昌黎黄金海岸国家级自然保护区土地利用生态风险评价[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(2):241-246.
[1] 吕刚,王利兵,刘军,李淑芬. 全氟辛烷磺酰基化合物水生生态风险和人体健康风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(6): 904-904.
[2] 胡雄星,韩中豪,张 进,夏 凡,王文华. 黄浦江表层沉积物中重金属污染的潜在生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 109-109.
[3] 欧冬妮,刘 敏,程书波,许世远,侯立军,高 磊. 河口滨岸悬浮颗粒物中多环芳烃分布与风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 620-620.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 健,陈 星,彭恩志,周学东. 气候变化对江苏省城市系统用电量变化趋势的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 546 -550 .
[2] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 于国荣,夏自强,叶辉,王桂华,吴 瑶. 大坝下游河段的河流生态径流调控研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 606 .
[5] 张 静,汪诚信,白呼群,苏崇鳌,鄂启顺,武桂珍,黄玉英. 三峡库区虫媒和自然疫源性疾病分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 145 -148 .
[6] 谢 辉,张 雷,姜 巍,程晓凌. 21世纪初华中地区发展的资源环境基础[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 1 -5 .
[7] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[8] 张代钧,许丹宇,任宏洋,曹海彬,郑 敏,刘惠强. 长江三峡水库水污染控制若干问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 605 -610 .
[9] 王肇磊, 贺新枝. 晚清时期湖北自然灾害的治理及其经验教训[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1080 .
[10] 韦 杰, 贺秀斌. 人类活动对嘉陵江流域泥沙负荷的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 196 .