长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (01): 16-24.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201601003

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于系统动力学-投入产出分析整合方法的江苏省产业用水综合效用分析

沈家耀1, 张玲玲1, 王宗志2   

  1. 1. 河海大学公共管理学院, 江苏南京 211100;
    2. 南京水利科学研究院水文水资源与水利工程科学国家实验室, 江苏南京 210029
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-27 修回日期:2015-06-11 出版日期:2016-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 张玲玲 E-mail:llzhang007@163.com
  • 作者简介:沈家耀(1991~),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为水利行政管理.E-mail:958379523@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51109055, 51279223, 51579064)[National Natural Science Foundation of China (51109055, 51279223, 51579064)];国家软科学基金项目(2014GXS4B047)[The National Soft Science Research Program (2014GXS4B047)];水利部公益性行业科研专项经费项目 (201301003, 201201022)[Public-services Foundation of Ministry Water Resources of China (201301003, 201201022)];中央高校基本科研业务费项目 (2015B23314)[Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015B23314)]

ANALYSIS OF COMPREHENSIVE UTILITY OF WATER UTILIZATION STRUCTURE BASED ON THE INTEGRATION METHODS OF SYSTEM DYNAMIC AND INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS IN JIANGSU PROVINCE

SHEN Jia-yao1, ZHANG Ling-ling1, WANG Zong-zhi2   

  1. 1. Water Management Institute, School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;
    2. Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2015-04-27 Revised:2015-06-11 Online:2016-01-20

摘要: 产业用水结构的欠合理一定程度上制约着社会的发展,如何科学评价产业用水情况,取得在经济效益、水资源和环境资源约束下的协调发展已成为目前区域社会经济发展面临与亟待解答的科学问题。以江苏省为例,提出了系统动力学-投入产出分析整合方法,在构建反映产业结构、用水结构和排污结构的互动反馈的水资源综合利用系统动力学模型基础上,通过敏感性分析确定对系统影响较大的关键变量,运用投入产出分析技术,对江苏省各部门用水特性、排污特性和经济效益特性进行计算测度,由此构建了3种产业发展模拟方案。依据系统动力学模型输出结果,对2025年3种方案下的重点产业部门用水综合效用情况进行对比分析,进而优选出"节水治污型"方案,并最后提出保障方案实施的对策建议,为江苏省产业和用水结构调整提供决策依据。

关键词: 系统动力学-投入产出分析整合方法, 产业用水结构, 综合效用, 方案模拟优选

Abstract: The unreasonable water utilization structure of industry restricts the development of society to a certain extent. How to evaluate the circumstance of water utilization of industry scientifically and secure coordinated development under the restriction of economic benefits, water resources and environment resources have become a technical issue that socioeconomic development has faced and with the urgent need to answer. This paper takes Jiangsu province as an example and puts forward the integration methods of system dynamic and input-output analysis. The interactive model of system dynamics of water resources composite utilization was conducted which reflects the structure of industry, water utilization and sewage drainage. We determine the critical variables which affect the system significantly through sensitivity analysis. The technology of input-output analysis was used to analyze the water utilization characteristics, pollution features and economic benefits features to build the simulation schemes of industrial development. Combined with the system dynamics model output, the comprehensive water utility of key industrial sectors in the year 2025 was analyzed and compared under three kinds of development schemes. Furthermore, the program of "water saving and control pollution" was selected as an optimal scheme. Finally, some countermeasures and suggestions were put forward to protect the implementation of the scheme and provide decision-making basis for industrial upgrading and restructuring of water utilization for Jiangsu province.

Key words: integration methods of system dynamic and input-output analysis, water utilization structure of industry, comprehensive utility, scheme simulation and optimization

中图分类号: 

  • F301.24
[1] 蒋桂芹,于福亮,赵勇.区域产业结构与用水结构协调度评价与调控——以安徽省为例[J].水利水电技术,2012,43(6):8-13.[JIANG G Q, YU F L, ZHAO Y. Assessment and regulation of coordinated degree between regional industrial structure and water utilization structure——a case of Anhui Province[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2012, 43(6):8-13.]
[2] REYNAUD A. An econometric estimation of industrial water demand in France[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003, 25(2):213-232.
[3] 刘慧敏,周戎星,于艳青,等.我国区域用水结构与产业结构的协调评价[J].水电能源科学,2013,31(9):159-164.[LIU H M. ZHOU R X, YU Y Q, et al. Evaluation of coordination between water consumption structure and industrial structure[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2013, 31(9):159-164.]
[4] 韩雁,黄跃飞,王光谦.水资源复合系统动力学仿真模型研究[J].水电能源科学,2010,28(10):26-30.[HAN Y, HUANG Y F, WANG G Q. Study on simulation model of water resources composite system based on system dynamics[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2010, 28(10):26-30.]
[5] 钟永光,贾晓菁,李旭.系统动力学[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
[6] 张玲玲,王宗志,李晓惠,等.总量控制约束下区域用水结构调控策略及动态模拟[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(1):90-96.[ZHANG L L, WANG Z Z, LI X H, et al. study on regional water utilization structure controlling strategy and dynamic simulation within the gross volume constraints[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(1):90-96.]
[7] 袁绪英,吴宜进,李星明.流域系统动力学模型的全耦合问题研究进展[J].环境科学与管理,2012,37(4):68-71.[YUAN X Y, WU Y J, LI X M. Progress on unity coupling problems of watershed system dynamic model[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2012, 37(4):68-71.]
[8] 陈静,杨凯,张勇,等.灰色协调度模型在产业用水系统分析中的应用[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(5):688-692.[CHEN J, YANG K, ZHANG Y, et al. Application of grey synergistic model in the appraisal of regional water use for industry[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2008, 17(5):688-692.]
[9] 廖明球.投入产出及其扩展分析[M].北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2009.
[10] WANG L, MACLEAN H L, ADAMS B J. Water resources management in Beijing using economic input-output modeling[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2005, 32(4):753-764.
[11] CHANAN A, KANDASAMY J, SHARMA D. A role for input-output analysis in urban water policy decisions in Australia[C]. Sevile, Spain:International Input Output Meeting on Managing the Environment, 2008. (请核对文献类型)
[12] 严婷婷,贾绍凤.河北省国民经济用水投入产出分析[J].资源科学,2009,31(9):1522-1528.[YAN T T, JIA S F. Input-output analysis of water use in industry sectors of Hebei Province[J]. Resources Science, 2009, 31(9):1522-1528.]
[13] 陈秀芬.基于信息熵的厦门市用水结构演变及其驱动力的灰色关联分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2013,24(2):188-191.[CHEN X F. Analysis of grey relation degree based on water utilization evolution and driving force of information entropy in Xiamen[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2013, 24(2):188-191.]
[1] 夏浩, 苑韶峰, 杨丽霞. 浙江县域土地经济效益空间格局演变及驱动因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 341-349.
[2] 潘竟虎, 张建辉. 中国县域人均粮食占有量的时空差异及驱动因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 410-418.
[3] 罗文斌, 孟贝, 钟诚. 农地整理项目治理绩效及影响因素研究——以浙江省48个国投项目为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 180-189.
[4] 胡学东, 王占岐, 童秋英, 李德胜. 基于生态和社会经济约束的区域土地整治潜力评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(05): 804-812.
[5] 赵筱青, 顾泽贤, 高翔宇. 人工园林大面积种植区土地利用/覆被变化对生态系统服务价值影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 88-97.
[6] 龚媛, 李飞雪, 洪武扬, 王丽妍, 黄秋昊, 李满春, 姜朋辉. 区域空间管制约束下的建设用地动态变化分析——以常州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1813-1818.
[7] 乔伟峰, 王亚华, 方斌. 基于变更平衡表的土地利用演化信息提取与预测方法研究——以苏州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1514-1520.
[8] 吴洁璇, 陈振杰, 李满春, 姜朋辉, 骈宇哲. 基于邻接关系的土地利用变化空间关联规则研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1537-1544.
[9] 吕剑成, 周磊, 洪武扬, 李满春, 黄秋昊. 城市土地生态适宜性分区划分研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1560-1567.
[10] 张孝宇, 赖宗裕, 张安录. 基于地块尺度的耕地非农化驱动力空间异质性研究——以武汉市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 994-1002.
[11] 张孝宇, 张安录. 武汉市耕地非农化的空间自相关分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(05): 781-788.
[12] 陈万旭 李江风 冉端. 长江中游城市群土地利用转型和城镇化之间空间关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0-0.
[13] 罗文斌 谢海丽. 2020年9期基于元分析的游客环境责任行为影响因素整合研究[J]. , 0, (): 0-0.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[5] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[9] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[10] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .