长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (01): 48-54.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201601006

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

围填海对南通淤泥质海岸资源影响的综合评价研究

陈玮彤1, 张东1,2, 刘鑫1, 韩飞1   

  1. 1. 南京师范大学地理科学学院, 江苏南京 210023;
    2. 江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心, 江苏南京 210023
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-11 修回日期:2015-12-28 出版日期:2016-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 张东 E-mail:zhangdong@njnu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈玮彤(1992~),男,硕士研究生,主要从事海岸带资源开发利用研究.E-mail:chenweitong_em@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家海洋局海域管理技术重点实验室开放基金项目(201406)[State Oceanic Administration Key Laboratory of Marine ManagementTechnology Open Fund Project (201406)];国家自然科学基金项目(41401371)[National Natural Science Foundation of China (41401371)];江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(164320H116)[A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu HigherEducation Institutions (164320H116)]

COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT ON COASTAL ZONE RESOURCES CAUSED BY RECLAMATION IN NANTONG MUDDY COAST

CHEN Wei-tong1, ZHANG Dong1,2, LIU Xin1, HAN Fei1   

  1. 1. Department of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China;
    2. Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Received:2015-05-11 Revised:2015-12-28 Online:2016-01-20

摘要: 在系统分析淤泥质海岸围填海开发活动对海岸带资源影响的基础上,重点考虑岸滩冲淤变化特性、岸滩资源利用现状、利用潜力以及泥沙淤积对港口航道造成的资源损失,通过成本型、效益型两大类共16个指标,构建了适合淤泥质海岸资源状况评价的压力-状态-响应(PSR)模型,实现了围填海开发活动对海岸带资源影响的综合评估。利用该模型计算了江苏省南通市沿海的围填海活动对海岸带资源影响的评价系数,计算结果为0.596,表明南通当前的围填海开发活动已经对当地的海岸带资源造成了较大影响,在今后的沿海开发过程中,需要注重海岸带资源的节约与保护。

关键词: 淤泥质海岸, PSR模型, 围填海, 海岸带资源, 评价体系

Abstract: The intensity of reclamation is gradually increasing in recent years. Extensive attention was given, because of the impact on the coastal zone resources caused by reclamation. On the basic of taking a full consideration of the muddy coast's features——silting-up and erosion, the pressure-state-response model was built; then we established a comprehensive evaluation system, which is suitable for silty mud plain coast, to evaluate the impact on coastal zone resources caused by reclamation. The pressure index includes three parts:financial loss, resources destruction, and ecological damage. The state index contains used and unused situation of coastal zone resources. The response index is about the funding which is used to develop the coastal zone resources, and safeguard procedures. In the index system, different types of coast were considered when choosing the state index; the resources loss of port channel caused by sediment silting-up was also taken into consideration. According to the principle of evaluation index, 16 indices were selected in total. The indices were standardized in order to make them comparable; then all the indices were divided into two categories:efficiency and cost; the weight of indexes were calculated at last. The impact on coastal zone resources caused by reclamation in Nantong Laobagang to Dongzaogang coast was evaluated using the evaluation system. The final value was 0.596. This means the present reclamation in Laobagang to Dongzaogang coast have a certain effects on local coastal zone resources. In future development, we need to pay attention to the saving and protection of coastal zone resources.

Key words: muddy coast, PSR model, reclamation, coastal zone resources, evaluating system

中图分类号: 

  • P748
[1] 王建. 江苏省海岸滩涂及其利用潜力[M]. 北京:海洋出版社, 2012:67-71.
[2] 王艳红, 温永宁, 王建, 等. 海岸滩涂围垦的适宜速度研究——以江苏淤泥质海岸为例[J]. 海洋通报, 2006, 25(2):15-20.[WANG Y H, WEN Y N, WANG J, et al. Feasible rate of tidal flat reclamation-Jiangsu mud coast as a case study[J]. Marine Science Bulletin, 2006, 25(2):15-20.]
[3] COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological economics, 1998, 25(1):3-15.
[4] DALKMANN H, HERRERA R J, BONGARDT D. Analytical strategic environmental assessment (ANSEA) developing a new approach to SEA[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2004, 24(4):385-402.
[5] 王伟伟, 王鹏, 郑倩, 等. 辽宁省围填海海洋开发活动对海岸带生态环境的影响[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2010, 29(6):927-929.[WANG W W, WANG P, ZHENG Q, et al. Effect of reclamation activities on coastal ecologic environment in Liaoning Province[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2010, 29(6):927-929.]
[6] 魏超, 叶属峰, 过仲阳, 等. 海岸带区域综合承载力评估指标体系的构建与应用——以南通市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(18):5893-5904.[WEI C, YE S F, GUO Z Y, et al. Constructing an assessment indices system to analyze integrated regional carrying capacity in the coastal zones:a case in Nantong[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(18):5893-5904.]
[7] 肖建红, 陈东景, 徐敏, 等. 围填海工程的生态环境价值损失评估——以江苏省两个典型工程为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(10):1248-1254.[XIAO J H, CHEN D J, XU M, et al. Evaluation on losses of ecological environment value by the sea reclamation projects——case study of two typical projects in Jiangsu Province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2011, 20(10):1248-1254.]
[8] 刘大海, 陈小英, 陈勇, 等. 海湾围填海适宜性评估与示范研究[J]. 海岸工程, 2011, 30(3):74-81.[LIU D H, CHEN X Y, CHEN Y, et al. Suitability assessment of bay reclamation and its application example[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2011, 30(3):74-81.]
[9] 王静, 徐敏, 陈可锋. 基于多目标决策模型的如东近岸浅滩适宜围填规模研究[J]. 海洋工程, 2010, 28(1):76-82.[WANG J, XU M, CHEN K F. Study on appropriate scale reclamation of Rudong shoal based on multi-objective decision model[J]. The Ocean Engineering, 2010, 28(1):76-82.]
[10] 肖佳媚, 杨圣云. PSR模型在海岛生态系统评价中的应用[J]. 厦门大学学报:(自然科学版), 2007, 46(S1):191-196.[XIAO J M, YANG S Y. Application of the PSR model to the assessment of island ecosystem[J]. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science), 2007, 46(S1):191-196.]
[11] 于定勇, 王昌海, 刘洪超. 基于PSR模型的围填海对海洋资源影响评价方法研究[J]. 中国海洋大学学报自然科学版, 2011, 41(7/8):170-175.[YU D Y, WANG C H, LIU H C. Study on reclamation impact on marine resources based on PSR model[J]. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 2014, 41(7/8):170-175.]
[12] 杨志, 赵冬至, 林元烧. 基于PSR模型的河口生态安全评价指标体系研究[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2011, 30(1):139-142.[YANG Z, ZHAO D Z, LIN Y S. The evaluating index system for estuary ecosystem safety based on PSR model[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2011, 30(1):139-142.]
[13] 张耀光, 关伟, 李春平, 等. 渤海海洋资源的开发与持续利用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(6):768-775.[ZHANG Y G, GUAN W, LI C P, et al. A study on the exploition and the sustainable utilization of marine resources in the Bohai Sea[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2002, 17(6):768-775.]
[14] 付元宾, 曹可, 王飞, 等. 围填海强度与潜力定量评价方法初探[J]. 海洋开发与管理, 2010, 27(1):27-30.[FU Y B, CAO K, WANG F, et al. On the quantitative evaluation method of intensity and potential of reclamation[J]. Ocean Development and Management, 2010, 27(1):27-30.]
[15] 张长宽. 江苏省近海海洋环境资源基本现状[M]. 北京:海洋出版社, 2013:1-500.
[16] 徐敏, 李培英, 陆培东. 淤长型潮滩适宜围填规模研究——以江苏省为例[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2012:230-237.[XU M, LI P Y, LU P D. Research on Appropriate Reclamation Scale of Prograding Tidal Flat——A Case Study of Jiangsu Province[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2012:230-237.]
[17] 周林飞, 许士国, 孙万光. 基于压力-状态-响应模型的扎龙湿地健康水循环评价研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2008, 19(2):205-213.[ZHOU L F, XU S G, SUN W G. Healthy water circulation assessment of Zhalong wetland based on PSR model[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2008, 19(2):205-213.]
[18] 王昌海. 围填海对海洋资源影响评价指标体系研究[D]. 青岛:中国海洋大学硕士学位论文, 2012.[WANG C H. Research on index system of reclamation impact on marine resources[D]. Qingdao:Master Dissertation of Ocean University of China, 2012.]
[19] 苗丽娟. 围填海造成的生态环境损失评估方法初探[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2007(3):47-49.[MIAO L J. Appraisal method on ecological environment losses in sea reclamation[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2007(3):47-49.]
[20] 刘家驹. 粉沙淤泥质海岸的航道淤积[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2004(1):6-11.[LIU J J. Silt siltation in approach channel of the coast with silty mud sediment[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2004(1):6-11.]
[21] 李飞, 徐敏. 海州湾保护区海洋环境质量综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(5):659-667.[LI F, XU M. An integrated assessment of coastal environmental quality in Haizhou Bay protected area[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014, 23(5):659-667.]
[22] 麦戈, 利锋, 吴昌华, 等. 城市污染河道浮游生物和底栖动物变异多元分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(22):11371-11374.[MAI G, LI F, WU C H, et al. Multivariate analysis of the community structure variation of plankton and macrobenthos in a municipal polluted river[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(22):11371-11374.]
[23] 高远, 慈海鑫, 亓树财, 等. 沂河4条支流浮游植物多样性季节动态与水质评价[J]. 环境科学研究, 2009, 22(2):176-180.[GAO Y, CI H X, QI S C, et al. Seasonal changes of phytoplankton diversity and assessment of water quality in four tributaries of Yi River[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2009, 22(2):176-180.]
[24] 乌敦. 用层次分析法评价呼和浩特市城市可持续发展状况[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版), 2005, 34(2):236-240.[WU D. Evaluation of sustainable development of Huhhot by AHP[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 34(2):236-240.]
[25] 张宗书. 区域可持续发展评价指标体系与方法研究——以四川省区域可持续发展评价为例[J]. 乐山师范学院学报, 2002, 17(4):79-82.[ZHANG Z S. On the index system and method of regional sustainable development evaluation——taking Sichuan Province regional sustainable development evaluation for example[J]. Journal of Leshan Normal University, 2002, 17(4):79-82.]
[1] 赵小汎. 土地利用生态服务价值指标体系评估结果比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 98-105.
[2] 游文荪| 丁惠君*| 许新发. 鄱阳湖水生态安全现状评价与趋势研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1173-.
[3] 李宗尧,|杨桂山. 经济快速发展地区生态环境竞争力的评价方法——以安徽沿江地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 124-124.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[2] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[3] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[4] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[5] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[6] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[7] 唐 琦,虞孝感. 东南沿海经济发达地区发展趋势与问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 650 -653 .
[8] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[9] 黄 峰 魏 浪 李 磊 朱 伟. 乌江干流中上游水电梯级开发水温累积效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 337 .
[10] 胡鸿兴, 张岩岩, 何伟, 田蓉, 钟鑫, 韩世松, 李思思, 王俊杰陈文方, 杨阳, 陈侈, 邓晗, 文英, 崔雅婷, 李茜,  王璇, 彭菁菁, 高鑫, 唐义. 神农架大九湖泥炭藓沼泽湿地对镉(Ⅱ)、铜(Ⅱ)、铅(Ⅱ)、锌(Ⅱ)的净化模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1050 .