“结构-行为-绩效”框架下农地整理的管护绩效研究

doi:11870/cjlyzyyhj201602010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在分析农地整理建后管护基本内涵的基础上开发了农民满意度绩效量表,引入新制度经济学领域"结构-行为-绩效"(SCP)范式,构建农地整理建后管护的"组织结构-管护行为-管护绩效"的分析框架。以湖北省赤壁市黄盖湖农场和嘉鱼县潘家湾镇为研究区域开展实证研究,通过比率标度法和熵权法生成绩效测度的组合权重并得到满意度绩效,运用调查数据检验建后管护的组织结构和管护行为对管护绩效的影响机理,分析组织结构的工作职能、成长机制以及管护行为中的集体行为和个体行为的影响程度。研究结果显示:受访农民对农地整理的管护绩效评价接近于"一般",企业管护模式下黄盖湖农场和集体管护模式下潘家湾镇的管护绩效存在显著的地区差异;表征管护组织持续发展状态、内部结构完善程度的组织结构类变量以及表征管护资金投入、受益农民群体参与程度的管护行为类变量是显著影响管护绩效的解释变量;黄盖湖农场企业化经营的组织结构、潘家湾镇的综合治理改革以及受到县级财政专项支持等外部要素是造成农地整理管护绩效差异的主要原因。研究结论验证了农地整理建后管护SCP分析框架的有效性,为提升农地整理管护绩效提供了理论依据。

关键词: 农地整理, 管护, 绩效, “结构-行为-绩效”范式, 满意度

Abstract: The behavior of supervision and maintenance was an importance guarantee for basic function of rural land consolidation. The essential implication for supervision and maintenance of rural land consolidation was discussed, as the premise of performance evaluation system development, from the view of peasants' satisfaction degree. Then Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm was introduced from neo-institutional economics fields to help establish a theoretical framework of organization structure, public participation conduce, supervision and maintenance performance for rural land consolidation. The empirical study was carried out after the field investigation both in Huanggaihu Farm in Chibi and Panjiawan Town in Jiayu, Hubei Province. The results were calculated by satisfaction degree and index weight, which was a linear combination value by subjective weight and objective weight. Afterwards, the supposed logic relationship among organization structure, public participation conduce, supervision and maintenance performance were examined by using collected data to explore the former two factors' influence on the later one. The main study results were as follows. Performance value of supervision and maintenance of rural land consolidationwas near to middle level, and the difference between Huanggaihu and Panjiawan was statistical significant. For all samples, several variables were significant factors, such as sustainable and improvement of organization structure, finance funding, public participation, and so on. The regression equations also explained that the enterprise management of Huanggaihu Farm, the governance reform and finance support of Panjiawan, were the chief reason of performance difference between two districts. The study results verified the effectiveness of Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm, and were useful for performance improving.

Key words: rural land consolidation, supervision and maintenance, performance, Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm, satisfaction degree

中图分类号:

S-36

赵微, 吴诗嫚. “结构-行为-绩效”框架下农地整理的管护绩效研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 249-256.

ZHAO Wei, WU Shi-man. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF SUPERVISION AND MAINTENANCE OF RURAL LAND CONSOLIDATION: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF STRUCTURE-CONDUCT-PERFORMANCE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(02): 249-256.

参考文献

[1] 王瑷玲, 胡继连, 刘文鹏, 等. 基于土地整理的耕地经济价值评定及其变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(9):296-300.[WANG A L, HU J L, LIU W P, et al. Evaluation and change of arable land economic value based on land consolidation[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(9):296-300.]
[2] 谷晓坤, 刘娟. 都市观光农业型土地整治项目的社会效应评价——以上海市合庆镇项目为例[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(8):1549-1554.[GU X K, LIU J. Evaluation of the social effects of urban sightseeing agricultural land remediation projects[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(8):1549-1554.]
[3] 金晓斌, 周寅康, 李学瑞, 等. 中部土地整理区土地整理投入产出效率评价[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(7):1198-1206.[JIN X B, ZHOU Y K, LI X R, et al. The input-output efficiency evaluation of land consolidation in central land consolidation region[J]. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(7):1198-1206.]
[4] 杨钢桥, 陈梦华, 汪文雄. 基于价值链的农地整治项目选址阶段效率测度模型研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 12(2):83-88.[YANG G Q, CHEN M H, WANG W X. A value-chain-based study on the efficiency evaluation model of farmland renovation projects location[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 12(2):83-88.]
[5] LISEC A, PRIMOŽIČ T, FERLAN M, et al. Land owners' perception of land consolidation and their satisfaction with the results-Slovenian experiences[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 38:550-563.
[6] 何一鸣, 罗必良. 产权管制、制度行为与经济绩效——来自中国农业经济体制转轨的证据(1958~2005年)[J]. 中国农村经济, 2010, (10):14-15.
[7] 罗文斌, 吴次芳, 倪尧, 等. 基于农户满意度的土地整理项目绩效评价及区域差异研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(8):68-74.[LUO W B, WU C F, NI Y, et al. Research on performance evaluation of land consolation projects and its difference features based on satisfaction of peasant households survey in east, central and western regions in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(8):68-74.]
[8] 严立冬, 麦瑜翔, 潘志翔, 等. 农地整治项目农户满意度及影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(6):1143-1151.[YAN L D, MAI Y X, PAN Z X, et al. Research on family satisfaction with rural land renovation projects[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(6):1143-1151.]
[9] 王佃利, 刘保军. 公民满意度与公共服务绩效相关性问题的再审视[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012, (1):109-114.[WANG D L, LIU B J. Revisiting the linkage between citizen satisfaction and public service performance[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2012, (1):109-114.]
[10] 张以晨, 佴磊, 孟凡奇, 等. 基于最优组合赋权理论的可拓学评价模型的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2011, 41(4):1110-1115.[ZHANG Y C, NAI L, MENG F Q, et al. Application of extension theory evaluation model based on optimal combination weighting law[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2011, 41(4):1110-1115.]
[11] 丁勇, 梁昌勇, 朱俊红, 等. 群决策中基于二元语义的主客观权重集成方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(5):165-170.[DING Y, LIANG C Y, ZHU J H, et al. A subjective and objective weights integrated method based on 2-tuple linguistic for group decision making[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2010, 18(5):165-170.]
[12] 道格拉斯·C. 诺思. 制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M]. 杭行, 译. 上海:格致出版社, 2008.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed