农地整理后期管护制度绩效研究：影响路径及中介效应分析

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201811024

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于湖北省4个地区的568份农户调研数据，借鉴SCP范式构建了“制度结构管护行为制度绩效”研究框架，采用结构方程模型分析了农地整理后期管护制度绩效的影响路径，并利用中介效应模型测度了制度结构对其绩效的影响效应，试图为管护制度的完善和制度绩效的提升提供一定的理论依据。研究表明：（1）利用结构方程模型和线性回归模型验证了SCP范式的有效性，制度结构不仅直接作用于制度绩效，也可通过管护行为间接作用于制度绩效，且间接作用大于直接作用。（2）制度结构中，非正式制度类变量贡献更大；管护行为中，角色内行为类变量路径系数更高。影响声誉、破坏劝阻、主体选择等测量变量对制度结构、管护行为、制度绩效的总效应最大，效应值分别为0.56、0.79、0.84。（3）管护文件覆盖区域与管护合同签订区域及全部实证区域中管护行为的中介效应均显著，且管护合同签订区域管护行为的中介效应高于管护文件覆盖区域。因此，建议重视非正式制度的激励与约束作用，逐步引导村民形成积极参与管护的惯例；加大管护基础工作的执行力度，尤其是对项目设施破坏行为进行及时劝阻，避免“破窗效应”；引入市场机制，推进管护主体选择方式多元化。

关键词: , 农地整理；管护；制度结构；管护行为；制度绩效

Abstract: This paper analyzes the influence path and effect of institutional performance of supervision and maintenance for rural land consolidation project by borrowing structureconductperformance paradigm, based on 568 questionnaires in Hubei province. It aims to provide the useful support for the perfection of the institution and improvement of institutional performance. Methodically, structural equation model and mediating effects model are employed. The main results are as follows. Firstly, the proposed SCP model is verified. The institutional structure could not only affect institutional performance directly but also indirectly through the supervision and maintenance behavior, and the indirect effect is greater than the direct one. Secondly, contributions of the informal institution variables are greater in the institutional structure, while the path coefficients of inrole behaviors variables are higher in supervision and maintenance behavior. Furthermore, reputation influence, destructiondiscourage, subject selection play the most important roles in the institutional structure, supervision and maintenance behavior, institutional performance respectively, with the effect values of 0.56, 0.79 and 0.84. Lastly, the mediating effect of supervision and maintenance behavior is significant in the studied areas, including document area and contract area. Moreover, the mediating effects of contract area is higher than the document area. In conclusion, we should pay more attention to the incentive and restraint function of informal institution, and guide the villagers to form the tradition of actively participating in supervision and maintenance gradually. Thus, the enforcement of infrastructure of supervision and maintenance should be strengthened, especially preventing destruction of facilities timely to avoid the “broken window effect”. Also, the market mechanism should be introduced to promote the diversification of subject selection procedure.

Key words: land consolidation, supervision and maintenance, institutional structure, supervision and maintenance behavior, institutional performance

周惠, 赵微, 汪飞腾. 农地整理后期管护制度绩效研究：影响路径及中介效应分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2629-2639.

ZHOU Hui, ZHAO Wei, WANG Feiteng. Influence Path and Mediating Effect of Performance of Supervision and Maintenance Institution for Rural Land Consolidation[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2629-2639.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

推荐阅读 10

[1]	曹银贵,王静,程烨,刘爱霞,许宁,郝银,饶彩霞. 三峡库区土地利用变化与影响因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 748 .
[2]	李翀,廖文根,彭静,叶柏生. 宜昌站1900~2004年生态水文特征变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 76 -80 .
[3]	张心怡,刘敏,孟飞. 基于RS和GIS的上海城建用地扩展研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 29 -33 .
[4]	苏伟忠,杨桂山,顾朝林. 秦淮河流域城镇用地增长格局及其演化机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 440 .
[5]	夏敏,赵小敏,张佳宝,刘友兆,曾志强. 基于GIS的土地适宜性评价决策支持系统——以南京市江宁区淳化镇为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 325 -329 .
[6]	宋玲玲,仇雁翎,张洪恩,赵建夫. 淀山湖叶绿素a的高光谱遥感监测研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 48 -51 .
[7]	陈卓良. 三峡库区夏橙发展前景[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 1992, 1(1): 6 .
[8]	赵小风\| 黄贤金\| 严长清\| 李衡\| 张兴榆. 基于RAGAAHP的工业用地集约利用评价——以江苏省开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(11): 1315 .
[9]	赵丹\| 张京祥. 高速铁路影响下的长三角城市群可达性空间格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(04): 391 .
[10]	卢碧林 \|严平川 \|田小海 \|金卫斌 \| 刘章勇. 湖北省主要大中型水库富营养状况及特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(05): 634 .