长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (08): 1292-1298.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201608017

•　农业发展　• 上一篇    下一篇

农地整理项目农户耕地损失补偿额度的实证研究——基于耕地资源价值与农户受偿意愿

文高辉1, 杨钢桥1, 赵微1, 吴诗2   

  1. 1. 华中农业大学公共管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430070;
    2. 武汉工程大学管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430205
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-04 修回日期:2016-05-08 出版日期:2016-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 杨钢桥 E-mail:ygq@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:文高辉(1990~),男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为土地利用与管理.E-mail:wengaohui360101@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目（12BGL078）；国家自然科学基金项目（71403094）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（2662015PY127）

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON FARMERS' COMPENSATION AMOUNT FOR THE LOSS OF CULTIVATED LAND IN RURAL LAND CONSOLIDATION PROJECTS: BASED ON CULTIVATED LAND RESOURCE VALUE AND FARMERS' WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT DUAL PERSPECTIVE

WEN Gao-hui1, YANG Gang-qiao1, ZHAO Wei1, WU Shi-man2   

  1. 1. College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
    2. School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
  • Received:2015-12-04 Revised:2016-05-08 Online:2016-08-20
  • Supported by:
    National Social Science Foundation of China (12BGL078);National Natural Science Foundation of China (71403094);The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662015PY127)

PDF (PC)

7

被引次数

2

摘要： 从耕地资源价值出发，测算农地整理项目农户耕地损失补偿额度，并基于湖北省孝感市和潜江市的农户调查数据分析农户的受偿意愿及其影响因素。研究表明：基于耕地资源价值体系，测算得到孝感市和潜江市农地整理项目农户耕地损失补偿额度分别为1 449 695.76、1 784 296.17元/hm2；农户所期望得到的耕地损失补偿标准远低于耕地资源价值体系测算出来的理论值，两市农户对耕地损失的平均受偿意愿额度为336 197.95元/hm2，可以农户受偿意愿为主、耕地农业生产价值和社会保障价值为辅，制定农地整理项目农户耕地损失补偿标准；受教育程度对补偿标准有显著负向影响，农户文化程度的提高有助于提高其对农地整理事业的认知程度，进而促进我国农地整理事业的发展；土地权属调整是解决农户耕地损失的一项重要措施，做好农地整理项目土地权属调整工作需充分尊重农户的意愿，并以农业现代化作为土地权属调整的目标。

关键词: 农地整理, 耕地损失补偿, 受偿意愿, 耕地资源价值, 农户

Abstract: This paper measures farmers' compensation amount for the loss of cultivated land in rural land consolidation projects based on cultivated land resource value, and analyzes farmers' willingness to accept based on farmer household survey data surveyed in Xiaogan city and Qianjiang city. The results were as follows. (1) The farmers' compensation amount for the loss of cultivated land in rural land consolidation projects in Xiaogan city and Qianjiang city were 1449695.76 yuan·hm-2 and 1784296.17 yuan·hm-2, respectively, based on cultivated land resource value system. (2) The compensation standard that farmers supposed to get for the loss of cultivated land was far lower than the theoretical value measured based on cultivated land resource value system. The average of farmers' willingness to accept for the loss of cultivated land in rural land consolidation projects in the two city was 336197.95 yuan·hm-2. So we could develop farmers' compensation standards for the loss of cultivated land in rural land consolidation projects based on farmers' willingness to accept, supplemented by the agricultural production value and social guarantee value of cultivated land. (3) Education level had a significant negative effect on the compensation standards. So arising farmers' education level was helpful to increase their cognitive level of rural land consolidation, and then promote the development of rural land consolidation in China. (4) The readjustment of land property rights is a major measure to deal with farmers' loss of cultivated land. Doing a good job of the readjustment of land property rights in rural land consolidation project, need to fully respect farmers' wishes. And the readjustment of land property rights should be based on agricultural modernization as the target.

Key words: rural land consolidation, compensation for the loss of cultivated land, willingness to accept, cultivated land resource value, farmers

中图分类号: 

  • F301.2
[1] 文高辉, 杨钢桥, 张海鑫, 等. 基于支付能力与支付意愿的农地整理项目后期管护农户出资分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2014, 28(10): 68-75.[WEN G H, YANG G Q, ZHANG H X, et al. The analysis of farmers investment in the ex-post management and maintenance of rural Land consolidation projects based on ability and willingness to pay[J]. China Land Science, 2014, 28(10): 68-75.]
[2] 吴九兴, 杨钢桥. 农地整理中农民利益受损的受偿意愿及影响因素[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 12(4): 49-56.[WU J X, YANG G Q. Willingness-to-accept and affecting factors in land consolidation when farmers' interests damaged[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2013, 12(4): 49-56.]
[3] 吴九兴, 杨钢桥. 农地整理项目中农民受益支付与受损补偿——以湖北省5个县区为实证[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 14(5): 28-32.[WU J X, YANG G Q. Benefit of payment and damage compensation of farmers' interests in implementing of agricultural land consolidation project-based on 5 counties in Hubei province[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 2014, 14(5): 28-32.]
[4] 王占骜. 论农地整理中公共利益与私权保护的平衡[D]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学硕士学位论文, 2013.[WANG Z A. Study on the balance of the public interest and the protection of private rights in agricultural land consolidation[D]. Shenyang: Master Dissertation of Liaoning University, 2013.]
[5] 李景刚, 欧名豪, 张效军, 等. 耕地资源价值重建及其货币化评价——以青岛市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(11): 1870-1880.[LI J G, OU M H, ZHANG X J, et al. Reconstruction of cultivated land resources value system and its evaluation: a case study of Qingdao[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(11): 1870-1880.]
[6] 马文博, 李世平, 陈昱. 基于CVM的耕地保护经济补偿探析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(11): 107-111.[MA W B, LI S P, CHEN Y. Economic compensation of cultivated land protection based on CVM[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(11): 107-111.]
[7] 覃事娅, 尹惠斌, 熊鹰. 基于不同价值构成的耕地资源价值评估——以湖南省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(4): 466-471.[QIN S Y, YIN H B, XIONG Y. Arable land valuation based on different kinds of values-a case study of Hunan province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2012, 21(4): 466-471.]
[8] 蔡银莺, 张安录. 武汉市农地资源非市场价值研究[J]. 资源科学, 2006, 28(6): 104-111.[CAI Y Y, ZHANG A L. The assessment of non-market value of agricultural land resource in Wuhan[J]. Resources Science, 2006, 28(6): 104-111.]
[9] 喻燕, 卢新海. 意愿评估法在农地非使用价值评估中的改进[J]. 中国土地科学, 2010, 24(1): 15-21.[YU Y, LU X H. Amelioration of the CVM in farmland non-use value assessment[J]. China Land Science, 2010, 24(1): 15-21.]
[10] 马爱慧, 蔡银莺, 张安录. 基于土地优化配置模型的耕地生态补偿框架[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(10): 97-102.[MA A H, CAI Y Y, ZHANG A L. Eco-compensation of cultivated land and accounting framework based on the optimal allocation model of land[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(10): 97-102.]
[11] 俞奉庆, 蔡运龙. 耕地资源价值重建与农业补贴——一种解决"三农"问题的政策取向[J]. 中国土地科学, 2004, 18(1): 18-23.[YU F Q, CAI Y L. Re-establishing the value of cultivated land resource for subsidizing agriculture-a policy-making orientation to resolve rural, agricultural and peasants' issues[J]. China Land Science, 2004, 18(1): 18-23.]
[12] 卢艳霞. 我国耕地保护补偿机制研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013: 84-91.
[13] 李翠珍, 孔祥斌, 孙宪海. 北京市耕地资源价值体系及价值估算方法[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(3): 321-329.[LI C Z, KONG X B, SUN X H. Cultivated land resources value system and its evaluation in Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(3): 321-329.]
[14] 王仕菊, 黄贤金, 陈志刚, 等. 基于耕地价值的征地补偿标准[J]. 中国土地科学, 2008, 22(11): 44-50.[WANG S J, HUANG X J, CHEN Z G, et al. Study on compensation standard of land expropriation based on value of cultivated land[J]. China Land Science, 2008, 22(11): 44-50.]
[15] 朱仁友. 我国农地估价中运用收益还原法存在的问题与求解[J]. 中国农村观察, 2000(5): 25-29.[ZHU R Y. Problems and solution of the income return method in the evaluation of farmland[J]. China Rural Survey, 2000(5): 25-29.]
[16] 蔡运龙, 霍雅勤. 中国耕地价值重建方法与案例研究[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(10): 1084-1092.[CAI Y L, HUO Y Q. Reevaluating cultivated land in China: method and case studies[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(10): 1084-1092.]
[17] 江冲, 金建君, 李论. 基于CVM的耕地资源保护非市场价值研究——以浙江省温岭市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(10): 1955-1961.[JIANG C, JIN J J, LI L. Non-market valuation of cultivated land protection using CVM: a case study of Wenling City[J]. Resources Science, 2011, 33(10): 1955-1961.]
[18] 张志强, 徐中民, 程国栋, 等. 黑河流域张掖地区生态系统服务恢复的条件价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(6): 885-893.[ZHANG Z Q, XU Z M, CHENG G D, et al. Contingent valuation of the economic benefits of restoring ecosystem services of Zhangye prefecture of Heihe river basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(6): 885-893.]
[19] DE GROOT R S, WILSON M A, BOUMANS R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393-408.
[20] 蔡银莺, 陈莹, 任艳胜, 等. 都市休闲农业中农地的非市场价值估算[J]. 资源科学, 2008, 30(2): 305-312.[CAI Y Y, CHEN Y, REN Y S, et al. Measuring agricultural land's non-market values of urban leisure agriculture[J]. Resources Science, 2008, 30(2): 305-312.]
[21] 蔡银莺, 张安录. 基于农户受偿意愿的农田生态补偿额度测算——以武汉市的调查为实证[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(2): 177-189.[CAI Y Y, ZHANG A L. Agricultural land's ecological compensation criteria based on the producers' willingness to accept: a case study of farmer households in Wuhan[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011, 26(2): 177-189.]
[22] 蔡志坚, 杜丽永, 蒋瞻. 基于有效性改进的流域生态系统恢复条件价值评估——以长江流域生态系统恢复为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(1): 127-134.[CAI Z J, DU L Y, JIANG Z. Contingent valuation of the economic benefits of restoring basin ecosystem with validity improvement: a case study for Yangtz river ecosystem[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(1): 127-134.]
[23] 唐学玉, 张海鹏, 李世平. 农业面源污染防控的经济价值——基于安全农产品生产户视角的支付意愿分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2012(3): 53-67.
[24] 杨俊. 不同类型农户耕地投入行为及其效率研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学博士学位论文, 2011.[YANG J. Study on the behavior of different types of rural households' input in cultivated land and its efficiency[D]. Wuhan: Doctor Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2011.]
[25] 吴诗嫚. 农地整理过程中利益协调机制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学博士学位论文, 2014.[WU S M. Study on the mechanism of interest coordination in the process of rural land consolidation[D]. Wuhan: Doctor Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2014.]
[26] 李平. 土地权属调整要充分尊重农民意愿[N]. 中国矿业报, 2012-10-13(A04).
[1] 周惠, 赵微, 汪飞腾. 农地整理后期管护制度绩效研究：影响路径及中介效应分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2629-2639.
[2] 郭贯成, 戈楚婷. 推拉理论视角下的农村宅基地退出机制研究——基于南京市栖霞区农户意愿调查[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 816-823.
[3] 赵微, 吴诗嫚. “结构-行为-绩效”框架下农地整理的管护绩效研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 249-256.
[4] 余亮亮, 蔡银莺. 补贴流向与耕地保护经济补偿政策农户满意度绩效——以成都市耕地保护基金为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 106-112.
[5] 廖炜, 高超, 刘汉生, 吴宜进. 基于Logistic回归分析的农户参与水土流失治理状况研究——以鄂西地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(05): 892-898.
[6] 詹和平, 林秀. 家庭保障、劳动力结构与农户土地流转——基于江苏省142户农户的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(7): 658-.
[7] 赵国玲, 杨钢桥. 农户宅基地流转意愿的影响因素分析——基于湖北二县市的农户调查研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1121-.
[8] 翟文侠,黄贤金. 应用DEA分析农户对退耕还林政策实施的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(2): 198-203.
[9] 马鹏红,黄贤金,于术桐,邬 震. 江西省上饶县农户水土保持投资行为机理与实证模型[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 568-572.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[5] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[6] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[7] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[8] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .
[9] 罗璐琴, 周敬宣, 李湘梅. 生态足迹动态预测模型构建与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 440 .
[10] 刘德富,黄钰铃,| 王从锋,. 水工学的发展趋势——从传统水工学到生态水工学[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 92 -96 .
ISSN 1004-8227
CN 42-1320/X
主管：中国科学院
主办：中国科学院武汉文献情报中心
地址： 武汉市武昌小洪山西区25号 中国科学院武汉文献情报中心内《长江流域资源与环境》编辑部
邮编：430071　
电话：027-87198181
E-mail： bjb@mail.whlib.ac.cn

版权所有 © 2018 《长江流域资源与环境》编辑部