长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (02): 316-325.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201602018

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

湖北省生态足迹和生态承载力时空动态研究

田玲玲1,2, 罗静1,2, 董莹1,2, 刘和涛1,3, 曾菊新1,2   

  1. 1. 华中师范大学地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430079;
    2. 华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院, 湖北 武汉 430079;
    3. 湖北省城市规划设计研究院, 湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-13 修回日期:2015-08-28 出版日期:2016-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 曾菊新,E-mail:zengjuxin@mail.ccnu.edu.cn E-mail:zengjuxin@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:田玲玲(1988~),女,博士研究生,主要研究方向为区域可持续发展与城乡规划.E-mail:tianlling_love@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41371183);华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费:长江中游地区地理过程与生态环境响应研究(CCNU15ZD001);华中师范大学优秀博士学位论文培育计划项目(2015YBZD032)

TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DYNAMIC RESEARCH OF THE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT AND ECOLOGICAL CARRYING CAPACITY OF HUBEI PROVINCE

TIAN Ling-ling1,2, LUO Jing1,2, DONG Ying1,2, LIU He-tao1,3, ZENG Ju-xin1,2   

  1. 1. Hubei Province Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China;
    2. College of Urban and Environmental Science, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China;
    3. Hubei Institute of Urban Planning and Design, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2015-04-13 Revised:2015-08-28 Online:2016-02-20
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Fundation of China, No.41371183;the Fundamental Research Funds for Central University in Central China Normal University: The response between geographic process and ecological environment in the middle Yangtze river, No. CCNU15ZD001;the Funds for Excellent Doctoral Dissertation Cultivation Program in Central China Normal University (2015YBZD032)

摘要: 研究湖北省内部可持续发展的趋势,以2005年、2010年、2013年统计数据为基础,应用生态足迹分析法核算湖北省17个市(州、林区)在三个时间节点的生态足迹与生态承载力,对各地区生态足迹和生态盈亏状况从时间和空间上进行动态研究。研究结果表明:湖北省17个市(州、林区)的总生态足迹和人均生态足迹呈迅速增长趋势,其中中部地区增长最快;2005年生态赤字最为严重的地区集中于以武汉为代表的中东部,2013年生态赤字最为严重的地区集中于中西部,生态赤字空间分布的重心逐渐由东部向西部转移;6种生态生产性土地增长速度由快到慢依次是建筑用地、化石能源、草地、水域、林地和耕地,其中潜江、恩施、天门、仙桃、黄冈等地建筑用地生态足迹增速最快,十堰、鄂州、黄石、荆州、荆门等地则是水域生态足迹增速最快,草地、水域、化石能源用地和耕地的生态足迹增长共同决定各地区人均生态足迹的变化趋势。

关键词: 生态足迹, 生态承载力, 生态盈亏, 时空动态, 湖北省

Abstract: Ecological footprint closely relating to sustainable development theory was an ecological and economic index which can measure the impact of human activities on the earth's ecological environment, and reflected the sustainable development level of a country or region quantitatively. Based on the statistical data of 2005,2010 and 2013, using the ecological footprint method to account for the ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity in this three time points of 17 cities (State, District) of Hubei province, and then deeply researched the different regions' ecological footprint, ecological carrying capacity and the status of the ecological surplus and deficit from the perspective of time and space to observe its dynamic changes, the results showed that: on the whole, the total ecological footprint and the per capita ecological footprint of 17 cities (State, District) of Hubei province had showed a trend of rapid growth, in which the central city was faster than the other area, such as Shiyan city, Suizhou city, Ezhou city, Yichang city, Xiantao city, Xiangyang city and Jingmen city, etc. In 2005, the most serious ecological deficit concentrated in the area of east-central Hubei province which represented by Wuhan city. However, the most area serious of ecological deficit had centered on the area of the mid-west areas of Hubei in 2013. The gravity center of the space distribution of ecological deficit had a significant offset from the east to the west. The ecological footprint of six kinds of ecological productive land of the 17 cities (State, District) are presented a rising trend, the growth rate of six types of ecological productive land from high to slow is construction land, fossil energy land, grassland, fishing land, forest land and cropland. Respectively in regional terms, Qianjiang city, Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Shennongjia Forestry District, Tianmen city, Xiantao city, Huanggang city, Xiaogan city, Yichang city, Xiangyang city had the fastest growth rates in construction land ecological footprint, while Shiyan city, Ezhou city, Huangshi city, Jingzhou city, Jingmen city increased most rapidly in fishing land ecological footprint. The fossil energy land ecological footprint of the other areas except for Xianning city were growing fast. At the same time, the rising trend of cropland ecological footprint was relatively smooth. For this reason, the grassland, fishing land, fossil energy land and cropland jointly decided the rising trend of per capita ecological footprint of each area of Hubei province, and construction land ecological footprint ' influence and effect would be more and more obvious as time goes on. In order to promote balanced and sustainable development of Hubei province, paper puts forward some suggestions: the first was adjusting the policy according to the regional actual situation, and coordinating with various types of land use. The second was using the transportation and location advantage, convenience of the bonded logistics park, the platform of urban agglomeration in the middle reach of Yangtze River and the Yangtze River economic belt to develop regional and interregional trade, achieving balance between supply and demand through the product circulation. Third, all districts actively implemented the main function zones planning, coordinate the production, living and ecological space to improve the ecological carrying capacity.

Key words: ecological footprint, ecological capacity, ecological surplus and deficit, temporal and spatial dynamic, Hubei province

中图分类号: 

  • X24
[1] WAEKERNAGEL M, REES W E. Our ecological footprint:reducing human impact on the Earth[M]. Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers, 1996.
[2] GÖSSLING S, HANSSON C B, HÖRSTMEIERC O, et al. Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 43(2/3):199-211.
[3] 傅春,陈炜,谢珍珍.中部地区生态足迹的比较研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(11):1397-1404.[FU C, CHEN W, XIE Z Z. A comparative study of the ecological footprint of the central region[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2013, 22(11):1397-1404.]
[4] 地球生命力报告(Living Planet Report)[R].世界自然基金会(WWF),2014.
[5] 罗静,陈彦光.论全球化时代的人地关系与政策调整[J].人文地理,2003,18(5):7-10.[LUO J, CHEN Y G. Toward man-land relationship and its policy adjustment on the era of economic globalization[J]. Human Geography, 2003, 18(5):7-10.]
[6] 张恒义,刘卫东,林育欣,等.基于改进生态足迹模型的浙江省域生态足迹分析[J].生态学报,2009,29(5):2738-2747.[ZHANG H Y, LIU W D, LIN Y X, et al. A modified ecological footprint analysis to a sub-national area:the case study of Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(5):2738-2747.]
[7] 周涛,王云鹏,龚健周,等.生态足迹的模型修正与方法改进述评[J].生态学报,2015,35(14):4592-4603.[ZHOU T, WANG Y P, GONG J Z, et al. Ecological footprint model modification and method improvement[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(14):4592-4603.]
[8] 马明德,马学娟,谢应忠,等.宁夏生态足迹影响因子的偏最小二乘回归分析[J].生态学报,2014,34(3):682-689.[MA M D, MA X J, XIE Y Z, et al. Analysis the relationship between ecological footprint (EF) of Ningxia and influencing factors:partial least-squares regression (PLS)[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(3):682-689.]
[9] 朱新玲,黎鹏.基于BP神经网络的湖北省生态足迹拟合与预测研究[J].武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015,17(1):77-80.
[10] HABERL H, ERB K H, KRAUSMANN F. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time:the case of Austria 1926-1995[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 38(1):25-45.
[11] WACKERNAGEL M, MONFREDA C, SCHULZ N B, et al. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series:resolving conceptual challenges[J]. Land Use Policy, 2003, 21(3):271-278.
[12] 张志强,徐中民,程国栋,等.中国西部12省(区市)的生态足迹[J].地理学报,2001,56(5):599-610.[ZHANG Z Q, XU Z M, CHENG G D, et al. The ecological footprints of the 12 provinces of West China in 1999[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(5):599-610.]
[13] 董泽琴,孙铁珩.生态足迹研究——辽宁省生态足迹计算与分析[J].生态学报,2004,24(12):2735-2739.[DONG Z Q, SUN T H. Ecological footprints:calculation and analysis of ecological footprints from 1999 to 2001 in Liaoning Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(12):2735-2739.]
[14] 安宝晟,程国栋.西藏生态足迹与承载力动态分析[J].生态学报,2014,34(4):1002-1009.[AN B S, CHENG G D. Dynamic analysis of the ecological footprint and carrying capacity of Tibet[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(4):1002-1009.]
[15] 张爱菊,张白汝,向书坚.中部6省生态足迹的测算与比较分析[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(4):625-631.[ZHANG A J, ZHANG B R, XIANG S J. Calculation and analysis of ecological footprint based on six provinces of central China[J]. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 2013, 22(4):625-631.]
[16] 张桂宾,王安周.中国中部六省生态足迹实证分析[J].生态环境,2007,16(2):598-601.[ZHANG G B, WANG A Z. The ecological footprint of middle China in 2004[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2007, 16(2):598-601.]
[17] 张家其,王佳,吴宜进,等.恩施地区生态足迹和生态承载力评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(5):603-608.[ZHANG J Q, WANG J, WU Y J, et al. Ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity evaluation in Enshi[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014, 23(5):603-608.]
[18] 郭秀锐,杨居荣,毛显强.城市生态足迹计算与分析——以广州为例[J].地理研究,2003,22(5):654-662.[GUO X R, YANG J R, MAO X Q. Calculation and analysis of urban ecological footprint:a case study of Guangzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 2003, 22(5):654-662.]
[19] 高崇辉,周江,周繁,等.湖北省生态足迹测度与动态变化研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2008,29(6):61-66.[GAO C H, ZHOU J, ZHOU F, et al. Studies on ecological footprint measure and dynamic changes in Hubei Province[J]. China Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2008, 29(6):61-66.]
[20] 刘义军,卢武强,李荣.湖北省生态足迹计算与分析[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2004,38(2):259-262.[LIU Y J, LU W Q, LI R. Hubei province ecological footprint's calculation and analysis[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2004, 38(2):259-262.]
[21] 江平平,陈银蓉,张苗.低碳概念下武汉市生态足迹的动态分析与预测[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):246-251.[JIANG P P, CHEN Y R, ZHANG M. Analysis and prediction of ecological footprint under the concept of low-carbon in Wuhan[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 22(1):246-251.]
[22] 张玉玲,吴宜进.基于生态足迹模型的湖北省可持续发展研究[J].资源环境与发展,2006(4):42-47.
[23] 李俊利.1995~2005年湖北省生态足迹与可持续发展能力研究[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(19):8205-8206,8300.
[24] 张佳琦,段玉山,伍燕南.基于生态足迹的苏州市可持续发展动态研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(2):177-184.[ZHANG J Q, DUAN Y S, WU Y N. Dynamic analysis of sustainable development in Suzhou on ecological footprint[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(2):177-184.]
[1] 李莹, 林文鹏, 宗玮. 基于改进模型的区域生态足迹动态分析——以江苏省南通市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 500-507.
[2] 张童, 陈爽, 姚士谋, 高群, 张家旗. 南京市生态足迹时空特征及脱钩效应分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 350-358.
[3] 王毅, 陆玉麒, 丁正山, 余茂军, 车冰清. 基于PDI指数的湖北省县域经济差异的方向及成因[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1663-1671.
[4] 敖荣军, 蒋亮, 张涛, 刘巧玉. 湖北省县域迁入人口的空间格局及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1672-1678.
[5] 江松颖, 刘颖, 万晶. 湖北省粮食生产的时空特征演变研究——基于耕地因素分解的视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1339-1346.
[6] 胡雪萍, 李丹青. 城镇化进程中生态足迹的动态变化及影响因素分析——以安徽省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 300-306.
[7] 卢新海, 柯善淦. 基于生态足迹模型的区域水资源生态补偿量化模型构建——以长江流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 334-341.
[8] 龙亮军, 王霞, 郭兵. 生态福利绩效视角下的上海市可持续发展评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 9-15.
[9] 马才学, 赵利利, 柯新利. 湖北省耕地非农化压力的时空演变格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 71-78.
[10] 焦雯珺, 闵庆文, 李文华, Anthony M. Fuller. 基于ESEF的水生态承载力评估——以太湖流域湖州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 147-155.
[11] 施媛媛, 李仁东, 徐兴建, 邱娟, 刘可群, 常变蓉, 易凤佳. 1980年来湖北省钉螺分布区域及其数量的消长分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1744-1750.
[12] 赵林, 于家烁, 薄岩, 杨娇, 李汉青. 基于SPEI的湖北省近52年干旱时空格局变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1230-1237.
[13] 龚胜生, 陈丹阳, 张涛. 1982~2010年湖北省人口分布格局变迁及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(05): 728-734.
[14] 刘保强, 熊理然, 蒋梅英, 张磊. 滇池流域生态承载力及系统耦合效应剖析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(05): 868-875.
[15] 胡鸿兴, 何伟, 沈虹, 王钰. 湖北“两圈”区域发展可持续性评价与预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(04): 351-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[2] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[3] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[4] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[5] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[6] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[7] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[8] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[9] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[10] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .