长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (05): 751-760.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201605008

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

武汉市耕地景观游憩功能与可达性的空间匹配格局

柯新利1, 李红艳1, 刘荣霞1,2   

  1. 1. 华中农业大学公共管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430070;
    2. 华中农业大学经济管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-20 修回日期:2016-01-02 出版日期:2016-05-20
  • 作者简介:柯新利(1977~),男,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为土地利用与管理.E-mail:kexl@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(41101098,41371113);国家社会科学基金(13CGL092);华中农业大学人文社会学科优秀青年人才项目

RESEARCH ON THE SPATIAL MATHCHING PATTERN OF CULTIVATED LAND LANDSCAPE RECREATION FUNCTION AND ACCESSIBILITY IN WUHAN

KE Xin-li1, LI Hong-yan1, LIU Rong-xia1,2   

  1. 1. Collage of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
    2. Collage of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
  • Received:2015-08-20 Revised:2016-01-02 Online:2016-05-20
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (41101098, 41371113);National Social Science Foundation of China (13CGL092);the OutstandingYouth Foundation Project for Humanities and Social Science in Huazhong Agricultural University

摘要: 揭示耕地景观游憩功能的供给能力与其可达性的空间匹配格局,可以为耕地景观游憩功能的合理布局、开发与利用提供依据。以武汉市为例,采用指标评价法和专家打分法,结合GIS空间分析,建立了耕地景观游憩功能的空间格局研究框架,对耕地景观游憩功能的供应潜力、可达性、及两者空间匹配等方面开展了研究。结果表明:(1)武汉市耕地景观游憩功能供应潜力的空间分布呈现从中心城区边缘向外逐渐降低的格局; (2)武汉市耕地景观游憩功能可达性呈现"中西部高,边缘低"的分布格局; (3)根据耕地景观游憩功能的供应潜力与可达性的空间匹配关系,将武汉市耕地景观游憩服务分为四类:高供应-高可达,高供应-低可达,低供应-高可达,低供应-低可达;这四类面积分别占研究区域的26.17%、25.24%、17.33%、31.26%。对耕地景观游憩功能的合理开发与利用、促进耕地利用的多功能化具有重要的现实意义。

关键词: 耕地, 景观游憩, 空间分布, 指标评价法, 武汉市

Abstract: Revealing the spatial matching pattern of supply capacity and accessibility of cultivated land landscape recreation function can provide the basis for rational distribution, development and utilization of cultivated land landscape recreation function. Taking Wuhan as an example, this paper used the index evaluation method and expert scoring method, combined with spatial analysis, to establish the research framework of spatial pattern of cultivated land landscape recreation function in Wuhan, from the supply potential of farmland landscape recreation function, accessibility and their spatial match. The results showed that:(1) The spatial distribution of the cultivated land landscape recreation supply potential in Wuhan is gradually decreasing from the center of the city edge; (2) The accessibility of cultivated land landscape function in Wuhan generally shows a distribution pattern of "mid-west high, edge low"; (3) According to the spatial matching of supply potential and accessibility, the cultivated land landscape recreation service in Wuhan is divided into four categories:high supply-high accessibility, high supply-low accessibility, high accessibility-low supply and low accessibility-low supply; and these four categories accounted for 26.17%, 25.24%, 17.33%, and 31.26% of the research area, respectively. The study of the cultivated land landscape recreation function has important practical significance on reasonable development and utilization of cultivated land resources, promoting multi-functional use of cultivated land.

Key words: Cultivated land, Landscape recreation, Spatial distribution, Index evaluation method, Wuhan city

中图分类号: 

  • F301
[1] 蔡银莺, 张安录. 城郊休闲农业景观地游憩价值估算——以武汉市石榴红农场为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2007, 21(5):27-35. [CAI Y Y, ZHANG A L. An Estimation of the recreational value of metropolitan leisure agricultural landscape:A case study of Shiliuhong Leisure Farm in Wuhan City[J]. China Land Science, 2007, 21(5):27-35.]
[2] CASADO-ARZUAGA I, ONAINDIA M, MADARIAGA I, et al. Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2014, 29(8):1393-1405.
[3] 杨雪, 谈明洪. 近年来北京市耕地多功能演变及其关联性[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(5):733-743. [YANG X, TAN M H. Changes and relationships of arable land functions in Beijing in recent years[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(5):733-743.]
[4] 谭永忠, 王庆日, 陈佳, 等. 耕地资源非市场价值评价方法的研究进展与述评[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(5):883-892. [TAN Y Z, WANG Q R, CHEN J, et al. Research progress and review on non-market value evaluation methods of farmland resource[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(5):883-892.]
[5] PENG J, LIU Z C, LIU Y X, et al. Multifunctionality assessment of urban agriculture in Beijing City, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 537:343-351.
[6] 宋小青, 欧阳竹. 耕地多功能内涵及其对耕地保护的启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(7):859-868. [SONG X Q, OUYANG Z. Connotation of multifunctional cultivated land and its implications for cultivated land protection[J]. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(7):859-868.]
[7] LOVELL S T. Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the United States[J]. Sustainability, 2010, 2(8):2499-2522.
[8] DEBOLINI M, VALETTE E, FRANÇOIS M, et al. Mapping land use competition in the rural-urban fringe and future perspectives on land policies:a case study of Meknès (Morocco)[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 47:373-381.
[9] 蔡银莺, 陈莹, 任艳胜, 等. 都市休闲农业中农地的非市场价值估算[J]. 资源科学, 2008, 30(2):305-312. [CAI Y Y, CHEN Y, REN Y S, et al. Measuring agricultural land's non-market values of urban leisure agriculture[J]. Resources Science, 2008, 30(2):305-312.]
[10] 郭焕成. 我国休闲农业发展的意义、态势与前景[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2010, 31(1):39-42. [GUO H C. The significance situation and prospects of the development of leisure agriculture in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2010, 31(1):39-42.]
[11] COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, De GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630):253-260.
[12] CAMERON T A, SHAW W D, RAGLAND S E, et al. Using actual and contingent behavior data with differing levels of time aggregation to model recreation demand[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1996, 21(1):130-149.
[13] DAUBERT J T, YOUNG R A. Recreational demands for maintaining in stream flows:a contingent Valuation approach[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1981, 63(4):666-676.
[14] VAN DEREK D B, VERBURG P H. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 37:163-174.
[15] NAHUELHUAL L, CARMONA A, LOZADA P, et al. Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service:an application at the local level in Southern Chile[J]. Applied Geography, 2013, 40:71-82.
[16] PARACCHINI M L, ZULIAN G, KOPPEROINEN L, et al. Mapping cultural ecosystem services:a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 45:371-385.
[17] PLIENINGER T, DIJKS S, OTEROS-ROZAS E, et al. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 33:118-129.
[18] 牛军让, 刘仓, 侯军岐. 用意愿调查法评估都市农业游憩价值——以杨凌国家农业高新产业园区都市农业建设为例[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2005, 7(6):72-76. [NIU J R, LIU C, HOU J Q. Evaluating the value of urban agricultural leisure landscape by contingent valuation method——Sampled by the urban agriculture construction of Yang Ling National Hi-tech Industrial Park[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2005, 7(6):72-76.]
[19] 武文婷, 包志毅, 汤庚国. 基于支付意愿法的杭州市园林植物景观游憩价值评估研究[J]. 中国园林, 2010, 26(8):63-67. [WU W T, BAO Z Y, TANG G G. On the assessment of recreational value of Hangzhou landscape plants based on Willingness-to-Pay Method[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2010, 26(8):63-67.]
[20] 吴小旋. 苍梧县几种公益林景观价值及游憩功能评估[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2013. [WU X X. Evaluation of landscape value and recreation function of non-commercial forests in Cangwu[D]. Changsha:Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2013.]
[21] 许倍慎, 周勇, 徐理, 等. 湖北省潜江市生态系统服务功能价值空间特征[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(24):7379-7387. [XU P S, ZHOU Y, XU L, et al. Spatial characteristics analysis of ecological system service value in Qian Jiang City of Hubei Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(24):7379-7387.]
[22] 王媛, 蒋文伟, 陈姝, 等. 慈溪市匡堰镇生态系统服务功能价值空间分布评估[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(5):58-62. [WANG Y, JIANG W W, CHEN S, et al. Spatial distribution assessment of ecosystem service function value in Kuangyan[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2013, 28(5):58-62.]
[23] 王美霞, 蒋才芳, 王永明, 等. 基于公路交通网的武陵山片区旅游景点可达性格局分析[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(6):187-192. [WANG M X, JIANG C F, WANG Y M, et al. Accessibility analysis of scenic spots in Wuling Mountainous Area based on road traffic network[J]. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(6):187-192.]
[24] 张鹏飞, 蔡忠亮, 张成, 等. 基于E2SFCA的城市旅游景点的潜在空间可达性分析[J]. 测绘地理信息, 2015, 40(1):76-79. [ZHANG P F, CAI Z L, ZHANG C, et al. Potential spatial accessibility to urban scenic spots based on E2SFCA[J]. Journal of Geomatics, 2015, 40(1):76-79.]
[25] 靳诚, 范黎丽, 陆玉麒. 基于可达性技术的农业旅游布局研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(9):1506-1518. [JIN C, FAN L L, LU Y Q. Spatial distribution of agricultural tourism based on accessibility in case of Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(9):1506-1518.]
[26] 谢花林. 乡村景观功能评价[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(9):1988-1993. [XIE H L. Preliminary researches on the functional evaluation of rural landscape[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(9):1988-1993.]
[27] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 肖玉, 等. 青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 山地学报, 2003, 21(1):50-55. [XIE G D, LU C X, XIAO Y, et al. The economic evaluation of grassland ecosystem services in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2003, 21(1):50-55.]
[28] 荣金凤. 欠发达地区生态系统娱乐文化价值评估研究——以内蒙古典型草原为例[D]. 南昌:江西师范大学, 2006. [RONG J F. Ecosystem recreation value evaluation of impoverished regions——A case of Silingol Steppe[D]. Nanchang:Jiangxi Normal University, 2006.]
[29] 鲁春霞, 谢高地, 成升魁, 等. 河流生态系统的休闲娱乐功能及其价值评估[J]. 资源科学, 2001, 23(5):77-81. [LU C X, XIE G D, CHENG S K, et al. Economic evaluation of river ecosystem service in recreation[J]. Resources Science, 2001, 23(5):77-81.]
[30] 柯新利, 马才学. 基于资源禀赋和经济发展区域差异的耕地优化布局——以武汉城市圈为例[J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(11):136-141, 148. [KE X L, MA C X. Interregional farmland layout optimization on the constraint of natural resources and social-economical condition——A case study of Wuhan City Circle[J]. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(11):136-141, 148.]
[31] LIU M H, LUO X B, LI Q Y. An integrated method used to value recreation land-a case study of Sweden[J]. Energy Procedia, 2012, 16:244-251.
[1] 刘燕, 王业成, 王让会, 刘圆, 袁琦菲, 李成. 南京浦口区大气负离子的时空特征及其与气象条件的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 706-712.
[2] 黄美玲, 夏颖, 范先鹏, 黄敏, 吴茂前, 刘冬碧, 张富林. 湖北省畜禽养殖污染现状及总量控制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 209-219.
[3] 李嬛, 宁越敏, 魏也华, 陈斐然. 长江经济带沿江城市群空间分布格局与联动机理研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1797-1806.
[4] 陈诚, 林晨. 苏南地区耕地质量评价与分区保护研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1860-1869.
[5] 翟天林, 金贵, 邓祥征, 李兆华, 王润. 基于多源遥感影像融合的武汉市土地利用分类方法研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1594-1602.
[6] 周艺, 徐晨娜, 王世新, 朱金峰, 吴亮, 王利双. 丝绸之路经济带中国段后备可利用水土资源空间分布格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1328-1338.
[7] 江松颖, 刘颖, 万晶. 湖北省粮食生产的时空特征演变研究——基于耕地因素分解的视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1339-1346.
[8] 文高辉, 杨钢桥, 赵微, 吴诗. 农地整理项目农户耕地损失补偿额度的实证研究——基于耕地资源价值与农户受偿意愿[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1292-1298.
[9] 凌赛广, 焦伟利, 龙腾飞, 刘慧婵, 易予晴, 武盟盟, 王威, 何国金. 2000~2014年武汉市城市扩展时空特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(07): 1034-1042.
[10] 丘雯文, 杨子生. 云南省耕地生产效率的时空差异及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(05): 786-793.
[11] 戴昭鑫, 张云芝, 胡云锋, 董昱. 基于地面监测数据的2013~2015年长三角地区PM2.5时空特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(05): 813-821.
[12] 张勤才, 马友华, 杨生华, 李小刚, 王静. 基于GIS的芜湖市耕地地力评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 226-233.
[13] 卢燕, 余斌, 韩勇. 基于客流结构的高铁经济辐射效应研究——以武汉市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 39-47.
[14] 马才学, 赵利利, 柯新利. 湖北省耕地非农化压力的时空演变格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 71-78.
[15] 余亮亮, 蔡银莺. 补贴流向与耕地保护经济补偿政策农户满意度绩效——以成都市耕地保护基金为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 106-112.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 彭长青,冯金飞,卞新民. 基于遗传算法和GIS的县域水田种植制度空间布局优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 66 -70 .
[2] 唐 琦,虞孝感. 长江三角洲地区经济可持续发展问题初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 269 -273 .
[3] 王海云,高太忠,高京,黄群贤. 基于AHPLP法的南水北调中线水资源优化配置[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 588 .
[4] 张 燕, 张 洪, 彭补拙. 土地资源、环境与经济发展的协调性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 529 .
[5] 黄锡生,唐绍均. 三峡库区环境安全保护法律实施机制探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 611 -615 .
[6] 张孝飞,林玉锁,俞 飞,李 波. 城市典型工业区土壤重金属污染状况研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 512 -515 .
[7] 廖富强,刘 影, 叶慕亚,郑 林. 鄱阳湖典型湿地生态环境脆弱性评价及压力分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 133 .
[8] 赵姚阳,濮励杰,胡晓添. BP神经网络在城市建成区面积预测中的应用——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 14 -18 .
[9] 许健民, 吕开宇, 娄博杰. 农业生产对土壤盐渍化影响的经济分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 132 .
[10] 刘 俊 陆玉麒. 经济快速发展地区土地利用结构的时空演变——以苏锡常地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 307 .