长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (09): 1358-1367.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201609006

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同滩涂促淤围垦方式对大型底栖动物群落的影响

杨吉强1,2, 郑珉磊1,2, 王琼1,2, 薛俊增1,2, 吴惠仙1,2   

  1. 1. 上海海洋大学水产种质资源发掘与利用教育部重点实验室, 上海 201306;
    2. 上海海洋大学港航生态安全研究中心, 上海 201306
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-07 修回日期:2016-03-03 出版日期:2016-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 吴惠仙 E-mail:hxwu@shou.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:杨吉强(1990~),男,硕士研究生,主要从事海洋生态学研究.E-mail:qiangjiyang@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市浦东机场外侧滩涂促淤圈围工程渔业资源修复项目;上海市自然科学基金(15ZR1420900);海洋公益项目(201305027-3)

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT TIDELAND RECLAMATION WAYS ON MACROBENTHOS COMMUNITU

YANG Ji-qiang1,2, ZHENG Min-lei1,2, WANG qiong1,2, XUE Jun-zeng1,2, WU Hui-xian1,2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Exploration and Utilization of Aquatic Genetic Resources, Shanghai Ocean University, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201306, China;
    2. Research center of harbor ecological security, Shanghai Ocean Univercity, Shanghai 201306, China
  • Received:2016-01-07 Revised:2016-03-03 Online:2016-09-20
  • Supported by:
    Fishery Resources Restoration Project of Siltation Zone outside of Pudong Airport, Shanghai "Natural Science Fund" of Shanghai (15ZR1420900);Public science and technology research funds projects of ocean(201305027-3)

摘要: 滩涂促淤围垦会对大型底栖动物造成一定程度的影响,但关于不同促淤方式对大型底栖动物的影响未见有报道。以长江口浦东机场外侧滩涂促淤区为研究对象,分析吹沙促淤区域和抛坝促淤区域中大型底栖动物的分布特点。结果显示:大型底栖动物在抛坝促淤区和吹沙促淤区年均密度分别为(835.98±572.41)ind./m2和(52.85±12.04)ind./m2,年均生物量分别为(135.25±63.99)g/m2和(40.82±6.84)g/m2,单因素方差分析显示,两者存在显著性差异(P<0.05),进而表明不同促淤方式对大型底栖动物的密度和生物量影响不同。CLUSTER 聚类和MDS排序图说明吹沙促淤区和抛坝促淤区断面之间的大型底栖动物群落组成存在差异性。对各断面间群落相似性矩阵进行SIMPER分析表明河蚬、光滑狭口螺和谭氏泥蟹为两种区域共有优势种,其贡献度分别为56.10%、10.81%、9.62%,且三者在吹沙促淤区中的密度分布少于抛坝促淤区。研究表明泥沙淤积的快慢程度是影响促淤围垦区内大型底栖动物分布的重要因素。

关键词: 滩涂, 促淤区, 促淤围垦方式, 大型底栖动物

Abstract: Effects of tideland reclamation on composition of macrobenthos have been confirmed by many reports. However, few studies were conducted on the impacts of reclamation ways on macrobenthos. In this study, we chose the tidal flat silting zone outside Pudong airport as the investigated subject to explore the different distribution characteristics of macrobenthos in a sand blowing siltation zone and a dike building siltation zone, respectively. Results indicated that the annual average density and biomass of macrobenthos were (835.98±572.41) ind./m2 and (135.25±63.99) g/m2 in the dike building siltation zone, whereas those were (52.85±12.04) ind./m2 and (40.82±6.84)g/m2 in the sand blowing siltation zone. One-way ANOVA analysis showed that there were significant differences between these two areas (P<0.05), indicating that reclamation ways had different effects on density and biomass of macrobenthos. Clustering and sequencing diagram showed that there were significant differences between the sand blowing siltation zone and dike building siltation zone in terms of macrobenthos composition. SIMPER analysis indicated that Corbicula fluminea, Stenothyra glabra and Iiyoplax deschampsi were the dominant species in those two areas, with the contributions of 56.10%, 10.81%, and 9.62%, respectively. Density of Corbicula fluminea, Stenothyra glabra and Iiyoplax deschampsi in the sand blowing siltation zone were less than those in the dike building siltation zone. The results imply that the rate of sedimentation was the key factor for the distribution of macrobenthos in the siltation and reclamation zones.

Key words: tideland, the siltation zone, reclamation ways, macrobenthos

中图分类号: 

  • Q143
[1] 韩雪双. 海湾围填海规划评价体系研究[D]. 青岛:中国海洋大学硕士学位论文, 2009. [HAN X S. The study of reclamation planning system in bays[D]. Qingdao:Master Dissertation of Ocean University of China, 2009.]
[2] 朱高儒, 许学工. 填海造陆的环境效应研究进展[J]. 生态环境, 2011, 20(4):761-766. [ZHU G R, XU X G. Research review on environmental effects of land reclamation from sea[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2011, 20(4):761-766.]
[3] LI K Y, LIU X B, ZHAO X G, et al. Effects of reclamation projects on marine ecological environment in Tianjin harbor industrial zone[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2010, 2:792-799.
[4] 吕巍巍. 围垦对横沙东滩大型底栖动物影响的初步研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学硕士学位论文, 2013. [LV W W. The preliminary study on the influence of reclamation on macrobenthos in the Hengsha East Shoal[D]. Shanghai:Master Dissertation of East China Normal University, 2013.]
[5] 袁兴中, 陆健健. 围垦对长江口南岸底栖动物群落结构及多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(10):1642-1647. [YUAN X Z, LU J J. Influence of diking on the benthic macro-invertebrate community structure and diversity in the south bank of the Changjiang Estuary[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(10):1642-1647.]
[6] 胡知渊, 李欢欢, 鲍毅新, 等. 灵昆岛围垦区内外滩涂大型底栖动物生物多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(4):1498-1507. [HU Z Y, LI H H, BAO Y X, et al. Biodiversity comparison of macrobenthic communities at tidal flat of Lingkun Island[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(4):1498-1507.]
[7] 张壮壮. 渤海湾近海栖息地变化对大型底栖动物群落结构影响的研究[D]. 上海:上海海洋大学硕士学位论文, 2014. [ZHANG Z Z. Marine habitat changes impact on macro-benthos communities in Bohai Bay[D]. Shanghai:Master Dissertation of Shanghai Ocean University, 2014.]
[8] NASER H A. Effects of reclamation on macrobenthic assemblages in the coastline of the Arabian Gulf:a microcosm experimental approach[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2011, 62(3):520-524.
[9] LU L, GOH B P L, CHOU L M. Effects of coastal reclamation on riverine macrobenthic infauna (Sungei Punggol) in Singapore[J]. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery, 2002, 9(2):127-135.
[10] 张斌. 长江口滩涂围垦后土地类型变化对水鸟的影响——以南汇东滩为例[D]. 上海:华东师范大学硕士学位论文, 2012. [ZHANG B. Influence of land use changes on waterbirds after coastal wetland reclamation in the Yangtze River Estuary:a case study of Nanhui Dongtan area[D]. Shanghai:Master Dissertation of East China Normal University, 2012.]
[11] 付桂, 李九发, 戴志军, 等. 长江口南汇咀岸滩围垦工程潮流数值模拟研究[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2007(4):47-54. [FU G, LI J F, DAI Z J, et al. Study of tidal flow numerical simulation on the reclamation project of Nanhuizui beach[J]. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 2007(4):47-54.]
[12] 葛振鸣, 王天厚, 施文彧, 等. 崇明东滩围垦堤内植被快速次生演替特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(9):1677-1681. [GE Z M, WANG T H, SHI W Y, et al. Secondary succession characteristics of vegetations on reclaimed land inside Chongming wetland seawall[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(9):1677-1681.]
[13] 高宇, 赵斌. 人类围垦活动对上海崇明东滩滩涂发育的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(8):475-479. [GAO Y, ZHAO B. The effect of reclamation on mud flat development in Chongming Island, Shanghai[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 22(8):475-479.]
[14] 张斌, 袁晓, 裴恩乐, 等. 长江口滩涂围垦后水鸟群落结构的变化——以南汇东滩为例[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(16):4599-4608. [ZHANG B, YUAN X, PEI E L, et al. Change of waterbird community structure after the intertidal mudflat reclamation in theYangtze River Mouth:a case study of NanHui Dongtan area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(16):4599-4608.]
[15] 仲阳康, 周慧, 施文彧, 等. 上海滩涂春季鸻形目鸟类群落及围垦后生境选择[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3):378-383. [ZHONG Y K, ZHOU H, SHI W Y, et al. Survey on shore birds community and their habitat in shanghai tidal flat in spring[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2006, 15(3):378-383.]
[16] 王磊, 刘敏, 许世远, 等. 上海滨岸潮滩生物多样性及其利用与保护[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2001, 10(2):132-137. [WANG L, LIU M, XU S Y, et al. Biodiversity in tidal flats of Shanghai coast with consideration of, its utilization and conservation[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2001, 10(2):132-137.]
[17] 李加林, 杨晓平, 童亿勤. 潮滩围垦对海岸环境的影响研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(2):43-51. [LI J L, YANG X P, TONG Y Q. Progress on environmental effects of tidal flat reclamation[J]. Progress in Geography, 2007, 26(2):43-51.]
[18] 马长安, 徐霖林, 田伟, 等. 南汇东滩围垦湿地大型底栖动物的种类组成、数量分布和季节变动[J]. 复旦学报(自然科学版), 2011, 50(3):274-281. [MA C A, XU L L, TIAN W, et al. Species composition, quantity distribution and seasonal variation of macrobenthos in East Nanhui Tidal flat[J]. Journal of Fudan University (Natural Science), 2011, 50(3):274-281.]
[19] 马长安, 徐霖林, 田伟, 等. 围垦对南汇东滩湿地大型底栖动物的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(4):1007-1015. [MA C A, XU L L, TIAN W, et al. The influence of a reclamation project on the macrobenthos of an East Nanhui tidal flat[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(4):1007-1015.]
[20] 陆道成. 南汇东滩促淤方式和速度的探讨[J]. 海岸工程, 1987, 6(1):54-64. [LU D C. Discussion on forms and rates of accelerating silt deposition at east beach of Nanhui near Yangtze River estuary[J]. Coastal Engineering, 1987, 6(1):54-64.]
[21] 吕巍巍, 马长安, 余骥, 等. 围垦对长江口横沙东滩大型底栖动物群落的影响[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2012, 43(2):340-347. [LV W W, MA C A, YU J, et al. Influence of reclamation on macrobenthic community in the Hengsha east shoal of Yangtze River estuary[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2012, 43(2):340-347.]
[22] 杨火其, 孙爱军, 黄金芳, 等. 抛坝促淤护底防冲技术在余姚市治江围涂工程中的应用[J]. 浙江水利科技, 2008(5):37-38. [YANG H Q, SUN A J, HUANG J F, et al. Application of siltation promotion and erosion control technique to river regulation and beach reclamation engineering in Yuyao[J]. Zhejiang Hydrotechnics, 2008(5):37-38.]
[23] 耿树标, 王伟. 吹沙填海地域道排工程降水井辅助工字钢围护结构基坑施工技术[J]. 安徽建筑, 2013, 20(2):142-143, 173. [GENG S B, WANG W. Construction technology of supporting flange beam containment foundation by dewatering well in reclamation area[J]. Anhui Architecture, 2013, 20(2):142-143, 173.]
[24] CLARKE K R, AINSWORTH M. A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables[J]. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 1993, 92(3):205-219.
[25] WARWICK R M, CARR M R, CLARKE K R, et al. A mesocosm experiment on the effects of hydrocarbon and copper pollution on a sublittoral soft-sediment meiobenthic community[J]. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 1988, 46(1/3):181-191.
[26] 陈才俊. 围垦对潮滩动物资源环境的影响[J]. 海洋科学, 1990(6):48-50. [CHEN C J. Effects of tidal flat reclamation on animal resources[J]. Marine Sciences, 1990(6):48-50.]
[27] LUI T H, LEE S Y, SADOVY Y. Macrobenthos of a tidal impoundment at the Mai Po marshes nature reserve, Hong Kong[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2002, 468(1/3):193-211.
[28] 袁兴中, 陆健健, 刘红. 长江口底栖动物功能群分布格局及其变化[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(12):2054-2062. [YUAN X Z, LU J J, LIU H. Distribution pattern and variation in the functional groups of zoobenthos in the Changjiang Estuary[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(12):2054-2062.]
[29] 付桂, 李九发, 应铭, 等. 长江河口南汇嘴潮滩近期演变分析[J]. 海洋通报, 2007, 26(2):105-112. [FU G, LI J F, YING M, et al. Analysis on recent topography evolution of nanhuizui tidal flat in Yangtze Estuary[J]. Marine Science Bulletin, 2007, 26(2):105-112.]
[30] 汪松年. 上海湿地利用和保护[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2003:14-22. [WANG S N. Wetland utilization and protection[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai science and Technology Press, 2003:14-22.]
[31] 陈吉余. 开发浅海滩涂资源拓展我国的生存空间[J]. 中国工程科学, 2000, 2(3):27-31. [CHEN J Y. To exploiting lower tidal flats for expending living space of China[J]. Engineering Science, 2000, 2(3):27-31.]
[32] 冷宇, 张守本, 刘一霆, 等. 昌邑海洋生态特别保护区潮间带大型底栖动物时空分布特征[J]. 中国环境监测, 2014, 30(2):164-169. [LENG Y, ZHANG S B, LIU Y T, et al. Spatial distribution and seasonal variation of macrobenthos in intertidal flat of Changyi marine ecological special protection Area[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2014, 30(2):164-169.]
[33] WARWICK R M, GOSS-CUSTARD J D, KIRBY R, et al. Static and dynamic environmental factors determining the community structure of estuarine macrobenthos in SW Britain:why is the severn estuary different?[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1991, 28(1):329-345.
[34] 张存勇. 连云港近岸海域海洋工程对生态环境的影响及其研究[D]. 青岛:中国海洋大学硕士学位论文, 2006. [ZHANG C Y. Effect and analysis of ocean engineering on ecologic environment in Lianyungang Coastal area[D]. Qingdao:Master Dissertation of Ocean University of China, 2006.]
[35] 王艳杰, 李法云, 范志平, 等. 大型底栖动物在水生态系统健康评价中的应用[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2012, 28(5):90-96. [WANG Y J, LI F Y, FAN Z P, et al. The application of benthic macroinvertebrates in aquatic ecosystem health assessment[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2012, 28(5):90-96.]
[36] 戴纪翠, 倪晋仁. 底栖动物在水生生态系统健康评价中的作用分析[J]. 生态环境, 2008, 17(5):2107-2111. [DAI J C, NI J R. Roles of benthos in the aquatic ecosystem health assessment[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2008, 17(5):2107-2111.]
[37] EL SAYED MOSTAFA Y. Environmental impacts of dredging and land reclamation at Abu Qir Bay, Egypt[J]. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2012, 3(1):1-15.
[38] 安传光, 赵云龙, 林凌, 等. 长江口九段沙潮间带大型底栖动物季节分布特征的初步研究[J]. 水产学报, 2007, 31(S1):52-58. [AN C G, ZHAO Y L, LIN L, et al. Primary investigation of seasonal characters of macrobenthic communities distribution in tidal flats of Jiuduansha wetland of Yangtze River estuary[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2007, 31(S1):52-58.]
[39] 章飞军, 童春富, 谢志发, 等. 长江口潮间带大型底栖动物群落演替[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(12):4944-4952. [ZHANG F J, TONG C F, XIE Z F, et al. The re-colonisation progress of intertidal benthic fauna community in the Changjiang Estuary[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(12):4944-4952.]
[40] 方平福. 滩涂湿地和人工湿地大型底栖动物群落生态学的比较研究[D]. 金华:浙江师范大学硕士学位论文, 2013. [FANG P F. A comparative study of the ecology of macrobenthic community of tidal wetland and coustructed wetland[D]. Jinhua:Master Dissertation of Zhejiang Normal University, 2013.]
[1] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529-2539.
[2] 冷龙龙, 张海萍, 张敏, 李天科, 刘晓波, 渠晓东. 大型底栖动物快速评价指数BMWP在太子河流域的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1781-1788.
[3] 李文浩, 张萌, 门吉帅, 敖雪夫, 胡新艳, 欧阳珊, 吴小平. 江西仙女湖流域大型底栖动物群落结构及水质评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1218-1227.
[4] 赵新新, 金晓斌, 杜心栋, 周寅康, 刘海玲. 沿海滩涂垦殖对土壤氮总转化速率的影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1552-1559.
[5] 韩华, 王昊彬, 余华光, 谭渝峰, 由文辉. 崇明滩涂湿地不同盐度梯度下芦苇种群及土壤的生态化学计量学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(05): 816-823.
[6] 田 波,周云轩,郑宗生,刘志国,李贵东,张 杰. 面向对象的河口滩涂冲淤变化遥感分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 419-419.
[7] 渠晓东,蔡庆华,谢志才,唐 涛,曹 明,黎道丰. 香溪河附石性大型底栖动物功能摄食类群研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 738-738.
[8] 王国庆,李磊岩. 钱塘江河口滩涂进一步治理与开发研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 27-31.
[9] 姜苹红,梁小民,陈 芳,周易勇,王洪铸. 月湖底栖动物的空间格局及其对水草可恢复区的指示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 502-505.
[10] 仲阳康,周 慧,施文彧,周 晓,周立晨,王天厚. 上海滩涂春季鸻形目鸟类群落及围垦后生境选择[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 378-383.
[11] 李茂田, 陈中原, 李 刚. 从长江口南汇东滩冲淤变化探讨合理选择促淤造陆边界[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(4): 365-369.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 龙开胜, 陈利根, 李明艳. 工业化、城市化对耕地数量变化影响差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 579 .
[2] 燕乃玲,赵秀华,虞孝感. 长江源区生态功能区划与生态系统管理[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 598 -602 .
[3] 田雨,方自力,谢强,潘红丽,刘兴良. 岷江上游植被在汶川地震中的损毁及灾后恢复状况[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(05): 735 .