长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (03): 505-516.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201903002

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析

李雪松1,龙湘雪2,齐晓旭1     

  1. (1.武汉大学经济与管理学院,湖北 武汉 430072;2.南京大学建筑与城市规划学院,江苏 南京 210093)
  • 出版日期:2019-03-20 发布日期:2019-03-22

Dynamic Evolution and Analysis of Coupling Development of Economy, Society and Environment in Yangtze River Economic Belt

LI Xue-song 1,  LONG Xiang-xue 2,   QI Xiao-xu 1   

  1. (1. Economics and Management College of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072,China; 2. School of Architecture and Urban Planning of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093,China)
  • Online:2019-03-20 Published:2019-03-22

摘要: 为探究区域发展的可持续性,在研究系统耦合协调评价体系的基础上,构建一个兼顾经济发展、社会进步与生态环境建设,适宜大区域、多城市的综合评价体系,并从时空两个纬度对长江经济带沿线109个地级以上城市2000~2015年经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展状况进行评估。结果表明:长江经济带经济-社会-环境总体耦合协调性较好,在15年间由初级协调向中级协调转变,但是其耦合发展具有明显的区域异质性,具体表现为东部优于西部,省会城市具有明显优势。同时还指出,在长江经济带耦合协调发展过程中,经济发展起最重要作用,而生态环境是发展的基石。由此,提出要提升人力资本、推进基础设施建设、推动区域间共同治理和保护生态环境等一系列政策建议。

Abstract: In order to study regional sustainable development, this paper established a comprehensive evaluation system for large regions, which included economic development, social progress and ecological environment. The coupling and coordinated development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt(YREB) was evaluated from two latitudes of time and space based on the relevant data of 109 cities in the YREB from 2000 to 2015. The results pointed out that the integral coordinated development of the YREB was better than before, and it has changed from primary coordination to intermediate coordination during the past fifteen years. The results also showed obvious regional differences: the east was superior to the west, and the provincial capital cities had evident advantages. Meanwhile, the results indicated that the economic development played the most important role in the process of coupling coordination development of the YREB, and the ecological environment was the cornerstone. Based on the aforementioned findings, relevant strategies should be put forward from the aspects of developing human capital, building infrastructure, jointly governing and protecting the ecological environment.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 韦 杰, 贺秀斌. 人类活动对嘉陵江流域泥沙负荷的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 196 .
[3] 黄, 薇, 陈 进, 王 波. 梯级开发对河流径流过程和水温过程均化作用的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 335 .
[4] 吴小庆 |王亚平|何丽梅|陆根法. 基于AHP和DEA模型的农业生态效率评价——以无锡市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(06): 714 .
[5] 袁晓玲|李政大|刘伯龙. 中国区域环境质量动态综合评价——基于污染排放视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(01): 118 .
[6] 周彬学 | 张 伟 | 马继刚. 基于分形的城市体系经济规模等级研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(5): 550 .
[7] 王 苗 |郭品文 |邬 昀. ENSO对我国东部极端降水的季节影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(06): 808 .
[8] 胡洋|余辉|李中强. 湿沉降对湖泊水质及初级生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(01): 75 .
[9] 龚艳冰, 刘高峰, 冯兰萍, 张继国, 胡娜. 江苏省水资源短缺风险的相似云评价方法研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 931 -936 .
[10] 吴见, 王帅帅, 谭靖. 基于安徽省土地利用变化的地形梯度效应分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 239 -248 .