长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (12): 2848-2856.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201912006

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

流域生态补偿政策对受偿地区经济增长的影响研究——以安徽省黄山市为例

张  晖1,吴  霜1,张燕媛1,虞  祎2   

  1. (1.南京林业大学经济管理学院,江苏 南京 210037;2.南京农业大学经济管理学院,江苏 南京 210095)
  • 出版日期:2019-12-20 发布日期:2019-12-10

Effect of Watershed Eco-Compensation Mechanism on Economic Growth in Compensation Area: Take Huangshan City as An Example

ZHANG Hui1, WU Shuang1, ZHANG Yan-yuan1, YU Yi2   

  1. (1.Nanjing Forestry University, College of Economics and Management, Nanjing 210037, China; 2.Nanjing Agricultural University, College of Economics and Management, Nanjing 210095, China)
  • Online:2019-12-20 Published:2019-12-10

摘要: 利用2012年安徽省黄山市成为生态补偿试点这一事件作为自然实验,运用双重差分的方法(Difference-in-Difference Method)分析实施生态补偿政策对黄山市经济增长的影响。研究发现:实施生态补偿政策使试点城市的人均GDP降低2.93%;且生态补偿政策对人均GDP的降低效果具有滞后效应,降低效果为2.15%。进一步分析表明,产业结构的改变是人均GDP下降的主要原因,体现在第二产业比重下降及第三产业的产值未能弥补试点城市为生态补偿政策付出的机会成本。从政策评估的角度看,生态补偿政策是以牺牲上游地区经济增长为代价的,因此,在环境治理的过程中要注重经济、生态、社会的协调发展。

Abstract: Huangshan City, which is located in Anhui Province, China, was selected as the pilot of eco-compensation mechanism in 2012. Difference-in-Difference (DID) method is taken to analyze whether the mechanism offsets the decline on economic, which is caused by ecological protection in Huangshan City. The results show that, ecological protection reduces the per capita GDP in Huangshan City at the level of 2.93%, regardless of the compensation from the government. In addition, the policy reduces the lagged value of per capita GDP at the level of 2.15%. Further studies suggest that, changes in industry structure could explain for the consequence. The proportion of secondary industry has been declining, while the value of tertiary industry fails to make up the opportunity cost that Huangshan City paid for ecological protection. From the perspective of policy evaluation, the implement of watershed ecological protection is at the cost of sacrificing the benefit of the upstream area. Besides, the eco-compensation mechanism could not take effect immediately and completely. Therefore, attention should be paid to the balance of economic, ecological, and society during the development of environmental governance.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杜晓芹, 王 芳, 赵卉卉, 王 远, 朱晓东. 基于CVM的武进港水环境综合整治工程环境价值支付/受偿意愿评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(04): 449 .
[2] 郭欢欢,郑财贵,牛德利,陈晓军,冯晓红. 不同情景下的人口迁移及其对农村土地利用影响研究——以重庆市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(07): 905 .
[3] 尹炜, 朱惇, 雷俊山, 贾海燕, 曾祉祥. 丹江口水库典型消落区不同土地利用类型土壤养分分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1185 -1191 .
[4] 于忠华, 李文青, 刘海滨, 秦海旭. 快速发展地区经济增长与资源环境协调性分析——以南京为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1698 -1704 .
[5] 王圣云, 翟晨阳, 顾筱和. 长江中游城市群空间联系网络结构及其动态演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(03): 353 -364 .
[6] 姜磊, 周海峰, 柏玲. 长江中游城市群经济-城市-社会-环境耦合度空间差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 649 -656 .
[7] 李金前, 王吉, 刘亚军, 邹锋, 马燕天, 吴兰. 水位高程变化对湿地土壤微生物代谢功能的影响研究——以蚌湖为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 730 -737 .
[8] 李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 吴四平, 杨叶, 娄淑兰, . 峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1809 .
[9] 何松蔚, 王成刚, 姜海梅, 曹乐, 王新伟. 2015年冬季苏州城市热岛特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2078 .
[10] 刘莲, 刘红兵, 汪涛, 朱波, 姜世伟. 三峡库区消落带农用坡地磷素径流流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2609 -2618 .