长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (12): 2980-2991.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201912018

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江入海水沙通量变化过程分析及变化趋势

朱博渊1,2,李义天3 ,余文钧4,孙昭华3,邓金运3,柴元方3,张春财1,2
  

  1. (1.长沙理工大学水利工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114;2.水沙科学与水灾害防治湖南省重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410114;3.武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072;4.长江航道规划设计研究院,湖北 武汉 430040)
  • 出版日期:2019-12-20 发布日期:2019-12-10

An Analysis of the Processes and Trends of Changes in Yangtze River Water and Sediment Fluxes into the Ocean

ZHU Bo-yuan 1, 2, LI Yi-tian 3, YU Wen-jun 4, SUN Zhao-hua 3, DENG Jin-yun 3, CHAI Yuan-fang 3,ZHANG Chun-cai1,2   

  1. (1. School of Hydraulic Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Water-Sediment Sciences and Water Disaster Prevention of Hunan Province, Changsha 410114, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China; 4. Changjiang Waterway Institute of Planning, Design & Research, Wuhan 430040, China) 

  • Online:2019-12-20 Published:2019-12-10

摘要: 针对河流入海水沙通量变化问题,以长江为研究对象,基于1950~2017年大通站及各组分实测水沙和降雨量数据,在分析入海水沙和各组分变化过程及各组分贡献比例的基础上,确定主要贡献组分,进而预测入海水沙通量的变化趋势。结果表明:(1)各组分年径流量和降雨量的多年变化均不大,使得大通站入海年径流量多年变化不大,宜昌站对入海年径流量的贡献比例为48%。(2)大通站入海流量年内分配过程逐渐坦化,其中宜昌站为主要贡献组分,洪枯季平均贡献比例分别为233.79%和80.36%;宜昌站的主要贡献作用体现了其上游梯级水库群对大通站入海流量过程的调平效应。(3)流域水库建设将使得大通站入海流量过程坦化和年径流量稳定的趋势得以维持。(4)大通站年入海沙量自1985年起显著减少,三峡水库蓄水前大通站泥沙主要来自宜昌,其贡献比例为116.04%,三峡水库蓄水后,大通站泥沙主要来自宜昌—大通区间的河床补给,其贡献比例为53.29%;水库下游河床补给逐渐减少和水库淤积平衡时间延长将使得大通站多年平均入海沙量在较长时期内(>300年)不超过1.5×108 t/a。

Abstract: To address the problem of changes in river water and sediment fluxes into the ocean, the Yangtze River was used as a subject of this study based on the field measurements of water, sediment and rainfall data at Datong station and its components from 1950 to 2017. By analyzing the processes of changes of the water and sediment entering the ocean and the various components and their contributing ratios, the principal contributing components were determined, and the trends of changes in water and sediment fluxes into the ocean were predicted. The results show that: (1) The annual runoff of each component and the rainfall had not changed much for many years, and as a consequence, the change in annual runoff from Datong station into the ocean had been unobvious. The contribution of Yichang station to the annual runoff to the ocean was 48%. (2) The intra-annual process of water flux from Datong station into the ocean gradually became more evenly distributed, with Yichang station as the primary contributing component, and the average contributing ratios during the flooding and low water seasons were 233.79% and 80.36%, respectively. The primary contribution of Yichang station reflects the smoothing effect of the upstream cascade reservoir group on the process of water flux from Datong station to the ocean. (3) Basin reservoir construction tends to maintain the flattening effect on the intra-annual process of water flux from Datong station into the ocean and the stabilization of the annual runoff. (4) The annual sediment load at Datong station had decreased significantly since 1985. The sediment at Datong station was primarily from Yichang station before the impoundment of the Three Gorges Reservoir, and the contributing ratio was 116.04%. After the impoundment of the Three Gorges Reservoir, the sediment at Datong station was mainly replenished from the riverbed along the reach between Yichang and Datong, and the contributing ratio was 53.29%. The gradual reduction in riverbed replenishment downstream of the reservoir and the prolonged reservoir sedimentation time are expected to prevent the average sediment load entering the ocean from exceeding 1.5 × 108 t/a for a long period of time (> 300 years).

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 梁涛, 史正涛, 刘志国. 昆明市街道灰尘粒度特征及其环境意义[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(1): 122 .
[2] 邵玉龙| 许有鹏| 马爽爽. 太湖流域城市化发展下水系结构与河网连通变化分析——以苏州市中心区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(10): 1167 .
[3] 叶磊, 周建中, 曾小凡, 张海荣, 卢鹏. 气候变化下SPEI指数在嘉陵江流域的干旱评估应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 943 -948 .
[4] 周少甫, 赵明玲, 苏龙. 中国碳排放库兹涅茨曲线实证研究——基于Gregory-Hansen协整分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1471 -1476 .
[5] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[6] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[7] 芦鑫, 殷淑燕, 王水霞, 高涛涛. 秦岭南北地区农业气候资源时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1866 .
[8] 梅梦媛, 陈振杰, 张云倩, 张亚楠, . 居民活动空间与生态约束协调的城市开发边界划定方法——以长沙市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2472 -2480 .
[9] 洪步庭 任平. 基于最小累积阻力模型的农村居民点用地生态适宜性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[10] 陈 博, 陆玉麒, 潘 颖, 舒 迪, . 基于装备制造业企业的长江经济带网络空间特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 261 -268 .