长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (12): 2971-2979.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201912017

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

农地转出:缓解还是加剧了农户的多维贫困?

蔡洁1,夏显力2   

  1. (1.长安大学公共管理与法学院, 陕西 西安710064; 2.西北农林科技大学经济管理学院, 陕西 杨凌712100)
  • 出版日期:2019-12-20 发布日期:2019-12-10

Can Land Transfer Ease or Aggravate the Multidimensional Poverty of Households?

CAI Jie1, XIA Xian-li2   

  1. (1.School of Public Administration and Law, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China;
    2.College of Economics and Management, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China)
  • Online:2019-12-20 Published:2019-12-10

摘要: 基于六盘山集中连片区的1 112户农户调研数据,在综合考虑样本选择偏差和异质性的基础上,通过构建内生转换模型分析了农户农地转出行为对多维贫困指数的影响。结果表明:农户农地转出行为能够显著地降低多维贫困指数。通过进一步的反事实假设研究,发现农地转出户如果不转出农地,多维贫困指数将提高22.16%;未转出户如果有机会转出农地,多维贫困指数将下降30.22%。尽管农地转出行为能够降低农户的多维贫困指数,但受制于以地为生思想意识的制约,集中连片区农户并不能做出合理的决策。

Abstract: Based on the survey data of rural households in the contiguous area of Liupan Mountain, the paper comprehensively considers the bias and heterogeneity of sample selection, and analyzes the transfer decision to the household poverty index and the per income. The results show that: 52.97% of households participated in the transfer of agricultural land. The land transfer can significantly reduce the multidimensional poverty index of peasant households. Through further counterfactual hypothesis research, it was found that if the households who rent out the land do not rent out of farmland, the household’s multidimensional poverty index will increase by 22.16%. If the non-transferred households have the opportunity to rent out the land, the household’s multidimensional poverty index will drop by 30.22%. Although land transfer can reduce the family’s multidimensional poverty index, it is constrained by the ideological consciousness of relying on the land for the livelihood. Concentrated farmers in contiguous destitute areas cannot make reasonable decisions.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李一曼, 修春亮. 浙江省陆路交通可达性与经济社会协调性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(06): 751 .
[2] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[3] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[4] 屈小娥. 中国生态效率的区域差异及影响因素——基于时空差异视角的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[5] 王 汶, 彭爱珺, 张佳丽, 徐四威, 余 涛, 白晓琼. 基于体感温度的中国供暖需求分区[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 12 -20 .
[6] 蒋豫, 魏永军, 蔡永久, 赵中华, 刘新. 太湖流域沉积物中有机氯农药空间分布特征及风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 387 -395 .
[7] 张思思, 徐飘, 杨正健, 马骏, 唐咏春, 刘德富. 城市湖泊有机质氮同位素差异及其对水污染的指示作用分析
#br#
[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 396 -406 .
[8] 朱顺顺, 章锦河, 胡欢, 陈草惠. 旅游发展的生态系统服务价值增值效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 603 -613 .
[9] 黄炎忠, 罗小锋, 刘迪, 余威震, 唐林. 农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳的影响因素 ——对高意愿低行为的现象解释 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 632 -641 .
[10] 袁颖红, 李丽, 芮绍云, 周际海, 刘贵军. 生物质炭及过氧化钙对旱地红壤CH4、CO2和N2O排放的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 642 -650 .