长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (2): 479-487.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202002021

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

三峡工程运行前后荆江三口水文情势的变化

高耶1,2,谢永宏3,4*,邹冬生1


  

  1. (1.湖南农业大学生物科学技术学院,湖南 长沙 410128; 2.湖南省水文水资源勘测局,湖南 长沙 410007; 3.中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410125; 4.中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所洞庭湖湿地生态系统观测研究站,湖南 岳阳 414018)
  • 出版日期:2020-02-20 发布日期:2020-02-20

Hydrological Regime Changes in the Three Outlets of Jingjiang River Before and After the Operation of the Three Gorges Project

GAO Ye1,2, XIE Yong-hong3,4,ZOU Dong-sheng1   

  1. (1.College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agriculture University, Changsha 410128, China; 2. Hydrology and Water Resources Survey Bureau of Hunan Province; Changsha 410007, China; 3. Key Laboratory for Agro-ecological processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China; 4. Dongting Lake Station for Wetland Ecosystem Observation and Research, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academic of Sciences, Yueyang 414018, China)
  • Online:2020-02-20 Published:2020-02-20

摘要: 基于1980~2015年荆江三口五站逐日流量数据,采用IHA指标体系分析度量三峡工程运行前后荆江三口水文情势的变化。除新江口和弥陀寺在枯水期1~3月有小幅增长外,三口各站点月均流量值均减小,汛期下降幅度较大。最大日流量值持续下降,但2003年后变化趋势相对平缓。沙道观和管家铺站断流天数显著上升,各站流量变化率明显降低。荆江三口水文情势变化受长江干流径流量减少、径流过程改变以及干流与口门河段河道冲淤不一致的共同影响,对长江中游四大家鱼种群以及洞庭湖苔草草洲的发展产生一定负面作用。

Abstract: Using mean daily discharge data from 1980 to 2015, effects of the Three Gorges Dam on hydrological situation of the Three Outlets were measured based on indicators of hydrologic alteration. Except for a slight increase in Xinjiangkou station and Mituoshi station from January to March, mean monthly flow showed a significant downward trend in the five hydrological stations of Three Outlets, and decreased more in flood season. The maximum daily flow showed an significant downward trend for all hydrological stations in the past decades, but the trend was relatively stable after 2003. Number of days for Shadaoguan station and Guanjiapu station draught-up increased significantly, and the rate of flow change was obviously reduced for all hydrological stations. Hydrologic regime change for the Three Outlets was influenced by its own channel evolution, runoff reduction and runoff process change of the Yangtze River, had some negative effects on the Four Major Chinese Carp populations and the Carex meadow development of Dongting Lake.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 许有鹏,于瑞宏,马宗伟. 长江中下游洪水灾害成因及洪水特征模拟分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 638 -643 .
[2] 刘腊美 龙天渝 李崇明. 三峡水库上游流域非点源颗粒态磷污染负荷研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 320 .
[3] 岳伟,曹雯,姚筠,王晓东,段春锋,王胜. 安徽省沿江地区棉花生长季气候变化特征及其对产量的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(09): 1308 .
[4] 胡振鹏, 葛刚, 刘成林. 鄱阳湖湿地植被退化原因分析及其预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(03): 381 .
[5] 高东东, 吴勇, 陈盟, 王春红. 贡嘎山森林系统小流域基流分割与降雨入渗补给计算[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 949 -955 .
[6] 李邹, 林伟立, 徐晓斌, 张万诚. 香格里拉区域大气本底站地面臭氧浓度的变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1412 -1417 .
[7] 陈心池, 张利平, 闪丽洁, 杨卫, 徐霞. 基于Copula函数的汉江中上游流域极端降雨洪水联合分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1425 -1433 .
[8] 李继洲, 吴海旭, 姜万, 袁旭音, 刘斌武. 南京城区黑臭河道底泥污染特征及生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1913 -1919 .
[9] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[10] 潘 静, 沈建忠, 孙林丹, 熊 雷. 长江、赣江鲢幼鱼耳石核区元素指纹特征分析及其在群体识别中的应用研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2740 -2746 .