长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (3): 776-784.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202003024

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    

规划管制下耕地保护空间外溢及区域财政转移——基于四川省的实证

马爱慧,唐鹏*   

  1. (四川大学公共管理学院土地行政与房地产管理系,四川 成都 610065)
  • 出版日期:2020-03-20 发布日期:2020-03-20

Externality Spatial Spillover and Regional Fiscal Transfer of Cultivated Land Protection under Planning Control: An Empirical Study Based on Sichuan Province

MA Ai-hui,TANG Peng   

  1. (Department of Land Administration and Real Estate Management, School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)
  • Online:2020-03-20 Published:2020-03-20

摘要: 摘要: 规划管制致使区域间保护耕地资源多寡存在差异,部分地区经济发展受到约束,带来相关利益群体机会及利益损失。基于耕地保护承载力角度,确定区域保护耕地资源空间外溢面积,利用机会成本核算单位面积保护耕地损失,在构建暴损程度系数基础上,核算区域间规划管制下耕地保护空间外溢量及区域间财政转移额度,为建立区域之间经济补偿和财政转移支付提供理论依据。结果表明:(1)四川省耕地资源保护空间外溢赤字城市有成都、攀枝花和雅安,赤字量最大的是成都市,赤字量达到650.71 kha;耕地资源保护空间外溢盈余的城市有14个,其中盈余量最大的城市是资阳,为219.98 kha;耕地资源保护空间外溢平衡城市是内江。(2)运用机会成本法,测算出单位面积耕地保护机会损失为每公顷25.30万元。(3)通过暴损程度及经济调节系数的修正,计算出区域之间的空间外溢补偿额度,为减少财政压力,按照盈余区补偿量总和作为空间外溢赤字区的支付总额,最终成都支付额度为416 775.25万元,攀枝花市支付额度为125.10万元,雅安市支付额度为83.40万元,财政转移支付结果具有一定的现实操作意义。

Abstract: Abstract:Land use planning regulation causes that there are differences in the protection of cultivated land resources among different regions and also leads to constraints on regional economic development,resulting in the loss of opportunities and interests for relevant groups.Based on the carrying capacity of cultivated land protection, the paper determines the spatial spillover area of regional cultivated land protection and utilizes opportunity cost to calculate loss of cultivated land protection per unit area.Then, on the basis of building wipeout coefficient, the paper calculates spatial spillover value of cultivated land protection and regional fiscal transfer payment under interregional planning control, which can provide theoretical basis for establishing regional economic compensation and fiscal transfer payment.The results showed that:(1)Chengdu, Panzhihua and Ya’an are the cities with spatial spillover value deficit of cultivated land protection in Sichuan Province, and Chengdu has the largest deficit, which reach 650.71 thousand hectares. There are 14 cities with spatial spillover value surplus of cultivated land protection, of which Ziyang is the largest city with a surplus of 219.98 thousand hectares, and Neijiang is the city with balance of space spillover in cultivated land resources protection. (2) By using the method of opportunity cost, the opportunity loss of cultivated land protection is estimated to be 253 000 yuan per hectare.(3)Regarding the fiscal pressure of local governments, the total amount of compensation in surplus area is viewed as the total amount oin spatial spillover deficit area.Therefore, the payment amount of Chengdu city is 4 167.752 5 million yuan, that in Panzhihua is 1 251 000 yuan, and that in Ya’an is 834 000 yuan. The result of calculation has certain value in practice significance.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李燕玲, 刘爱民. 长江流域冬季农业主要作物的耕地竞争机制及案例研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 146 .
[2] 彭长青,冯金飞,卞新民. 基于遗传算法和GIS的县域水田种植制度空间布局优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 66 -70 .
[3] 蔡邦成,陆根法,宋莉娟,陈克亮. 南水北调东线水源地保护区生态建设的生态经济效益评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 384 -387 .
[4] 向悟生, 李先琨, 何成新, 吕仕洪, 陆树华. 石漠化山地复合生态系统评价——以广西平果县龙何屯生态重建示范区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 826 .
[5] 禹 娜,陈立侨,赵泉鸿. 太湖介形类动物丰度与生物量[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 546 .
[6] 唐华秀,马劲松,战金艳,邓祥征. 江苏省人口数据空间离散化研究及其精度分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 506 .
[7] 仲阳康,周 慧,施文彧,周 晓,周立晨,王天厚. 上海滩涂春季鸻形目鸟类群落及围垦后生境选择[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 378 -383 .
[8] 燕乃玲,赵秀华,虞孝感. 长江源区生态功能区划与生态系统管理[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 598 -602 .
[9] 陶豫萍,吴 宁,罗 鹏,刘 兵. 森林对污染物(SO2-4)的过滤器效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 628 -632 .
[10] 李成范,刘岚, 周廷刚,张力, 吴忠芳. 基于定量遥感技术的重庆市热岛效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 60 .