长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (8): 1846-1857.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202008016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

三峡水库支流神农溪库湾倒灌异重流特征及成因分析

石浩洋1, 崔玉洁1,2* ,宋林旭 1,2, 刘德富1,2,纪道斌1,2,霍静1, 孙启鑫1   

  1. (1. 三峡大学水利与环境学院,湖北 宜昌 443002;2.三峡库区生态环境教育部工程研究中心,湖北 宜昌 443002)
  • 出版日期:2020-08-20 发布日期:2020-09-21

Characteristics and Causes of Density Flow in the Shennong Bay of the Three Gorges Reservoir

SHI Hao-yang 1,CUI Yu-jie 1,2,SONG Lin-xu 1,2,LIU De-fu 1,2, JI Dao-bin 1,2,HUO Jing 1,SUN Qi-xin 1   

  1. (1. College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002,China;
    2.Engineering Research Center of Eco-environment in Three Gorges Reservoir, Ministry of Education,
    China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)
  • Online:2020-08-20 Published:2020-09-21

摘要: 三峡水库蓄水以来,库区干支流水动力变化显著。探明三峡水库支流库湾倒灌异重流的成因对库区水华防控调度十分关键。基于2018年野外观测数据,对神农溪库湾水流速度,水温,浊度等因素进行分析。结果表明:库湾春冬季由于水温变化不大,泥沙含量很低,干支流密度差较小,导致倒灌异重流呈无规律状态;夏秋水温变化较大,泥沙含量大幅升高,水体多以中、底层倒灌形式从干流潜入库湾。库湾在汛期受泥沙含量较高的影响,导致水体密度增大形成异重流,且大部分出现在库湾中底层,其他月份异重流是由水体温差形成的,温差是倒灌异重流的主要成因;汛期6~8月,干支流泥沙含量升高,泥沙含量对水体密度的贡献率增大,最大为75%;其他月份水体密度主要受水温影响,水温对水体密度的贡献程度在各月均超过80%,最大贡献率为95%。

Abstract: Since the impoundment of the Three Gorges Reservoir, the hydrodynamics of the mainstreams and tributaries in the reservoir have changed significantly. It is very important to find out the reason of the density flow in the bay of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Based on the field observation data of 2018, the water flow velocity, water temperature and turbidity of Shennong Bay were analyzed. The results show that the water temperature in the Shennong Bay was not changed greatly in spring and winter, the sediment concentration was very low, and the difference of the mainstream and tributary was small, which leaded to the density flow in an irregular state. The water temperature in summer and autumn changed greatly, the sediment concentration increased greatly, and the water body most of them were submerged into the reservoir bay from the mainstream by means of medium and bottom inversion. In the flood season, the reservoir was affected by the high sediment concentration, which leaded to the increase of water density and the formation of density flow, and most of them appear in the middle and bottom of the reservoir bay. In other months, the density flow potential was formed by the temperature difference of the water body, and the temperature difference was the reverse irrigation. From June to August,the main cause of density flow was the sediment concentration of the difference between the mainstream and tributary increased, the contribution rate of sediment content to water density increased, up to 75%; the density of water in other months mainly affected by water temperature, the contribution of water temperature to water density exceeded 80% in each month, and the maximum contribution rate was 95%.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张俊峰,张安录,董 捷. 武汉城市圈土地利用碳排放效应分析及因素分解研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(05): 595 .
[2] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[3] 伍文琪, 罗贤, 黄玮。李运刚. 云南省水资源承载力评价与时空分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[4] 李恩康, 陆玉麒, 王 毅, 黄群芳, 郭 政. 城镇化对制度转型的影响——基于江苏13个市的脉冲响应函数分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1919 -1927 .
[5] 朱寅健. (新)环鄱阳湖区域交通网络通达性与旅游一体化发展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[6] 刘冀, 孙周亮, 张特, 程雄, 董晓华, 谈新. 基于不同卫星降雨产品的澴水花园流域径流模拟比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2558 -2567 .
[7] 谢五三, 吴 蓉, 丁小俊. 基于FloodArea模型的城市内涝灾害风险评估与预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2848 -2855 .
[8] 孔锋. 基于不同等级降雨视角透视气候工程对中国降雨结构的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[9] 刘晓阳 黄晓东 丁志伟. 长江经济带县域信息化水平的空间差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[10] 郭庆宾, 骆 康, 黎珏铭, 刘承良. 武汉城市圈资源集聚能力的空间关联研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 306 -312 .