长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (9): 2047-2056.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202009015

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

责任意识能激发稻农亲环境生产行为吗?——基于情境约束的调节效应

余威震1,2,罗小锋1,2,王洁1,唐林1,2,黄炎忠1,2   

  1. (1.华中农业大学经济管理学院,湖北 武汉 430070;2.湖北农村发展研究中心,湖北 武汉 430070)
  • 出版日期:2020-09-20 发布日期:2020-09-30

Can Responsibility Consciousness Arouse Rice Farmer to Be Pro-environment Production Behavior?: Based on Moderating Effects of Situational Constraints

YU Wei-zhen 1,2, LUO Xiao-feng 1,2, WANG Jie 1, TANG Lin 1,2,HUANG Yan-zhong 1,2   

  1. (1.College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2. Hubei Rural Development Research Center, Wuhan 430070, China)
  • Online:2020-09-20 Published:2020-09-30

摘要: 积极鼓励与推广农业亲环境生产行为,是实现我国农业绿色、可持续发展的必然选择。基于湖北省765份实地调研数据,运用有序Probit模型探讨了责任意识对稻农亲环境生产行为的影响,并进一步检验了情境约束的调节效应,以期厘清与掌握不同情境下责任意识的作用机理。结果显示:(1)稻农亲环境生产行为采纳程度较低,集中于采纳1~2项的样本为主,平均采纳数量为1.91项。(2)责任意识维度中,责任归属、责任认知对稻农亲环境生产行为均起到显著正向影响,而行为担当却起到显著负向影响。(3)村规民约能减轻行为担当对稻农亲环境生产行为的负向影响,但也会一定程度上削弱责任认知的积极作用;面对农业生态环境压力,责任归属对稻农亲环境生产行为的正向作用同样有所降低。

Abstract: It is an inevitable choice to actively encourage and popularize the pro-environment production behavior of agriculture to realize the green and sustainable development of agriculture in China. Based on 765 field survey data from Hubei province, the effect of responsibility consciousness on the pro-environment production behavior of rice farmers was discussed by using the Ordered-Probit model, and the moderator effect of situational constraints was further tested, so as to clarify and grasp the mechanism of responsibility consciousness in different situations. The results showed that: first, the adoption degree of rice farmers' pro-environment production behavior was relatively low, mainly focusing on the adoption of samples of 1 or 2 items, with an average adoption quantity of 1.91 items. Second, in the dimension of responsibility consciousness, responsibility attribution and responsibility cognition had significant positive effects on the rice farmers' pro-environmental production behaviors, while behavioral responsibility had significant negative effects. Third, village rules and agreements could reduce the negative impact of behavioral responsibility on the farmers' pro-environmental production behavior, but also weaken the positive effect of responsibility cognition to some extent. In the face of the pressure of agricultural ecological environment, the positive effect of responsibility attribution on the pro-environmental production behavior of rice farmers also decreased.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 胡茂林,吴志强,常剑波 . 鄱阳湖南矶山自然保护区鲤、鲫的随机扩增多态DNA分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 314 .
[2] 黄彬彬|王先甲|胡振鹏|桂发亮. 基于纳污红线的河流排污权优化分配模型[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(12): 1508 .
[3] 常变蓉|李仁东|徐兴建|邱娟|易凤佳|罗开盛. 江汉平原土地利用对钉螺分布的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(03): 380 .
[4] 胡春华|周文斌. 鄱阳湖流域水化学环境参数的变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(03): 427 .
[5] 王 珏, 袁丰. 基于演化树模型的长江三角洲城市紧凑度综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(06): 741 .
[6] 张爱平, 刘艳华, 钟林生, 徐勇, 周凤杰. 基于场理论的沪苏浙皖地区旅游空间差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(03): 364 .
[7] 卿晓霞, 王兆兴, 周健, 黄巍. 山地城市小型季节性河流雨洪淹没的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 679 -684 .
[8] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[9] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[10] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .