长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (12): 2805-2815.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202012023

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

农户参与村域生态治理行为分析 ——基于认同、人际与制度三维视角

唐林1,2,罗小锋1,2* ,余威震3,黄炎忠1,2,李容容4   

  1. (1.华中农业大学经济管理学院,湖北 武汉430070;2.湖北农村发展研究中心,湖北 武汉430070;
    3.三峡大学经济与管理学院,湖北 宜昌443002;4.湖北工业大学马克思主义学院,湖北 武汉 430068)
  • 出版日期:2020-12-20 发布日期:2021-01-14

Analysis of Farmers' Participation Behavior of Village DominEcological Governance: Based on Identity, Interpersonal and Institutional Three-dimensional Perspectives

TANG Lin 1,2,LUO Xiao-feng 1,2,YU Wei-zheng 3,HUANG Yan-zhong 1,2,LI Rong-rong 4   

  1. (1.College of Economics & Management,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070, China;
    2.Hubei Rural Development Research Center,Wuhan 430073;3.College of Economics & Management,
    China Three Gorges University Yichang 443002,China;4.College of Marxism,Hubei university of technology,Wuhan 430068, China)
  • Online:2020-12-20 Published:2021-01-14

摘要: 利用湖北省603份农户微观调研数据,通过纳入农村熟人社会情境因素,构建人际信任、制度信任和群体认同的三维分析框架,探讨农户参与村域生态治理的行为逻辑和影响因素。研究结果表明:(1)人际信任、制度信任和群体认同均对农户村域生态治理参与行为有显著的正向影响。(2)人际信任在群体认同和农户村域生态治理参与行为之间起着中介作用;同时,群体认同在制度信任和农户村域生态治理参与行为间起着负向的调节作用。(3)在纳入群体认同的情况下,农户的人际信任和制度信任对其村域生态治理参与行为起着相反的作用,即人际信任和制度信任之间可能存在一种“替代”关系。基于此,通过营造一种互惠互利的社会风尚,让生态治理政策的内容和村集体行动更能够契合广大农户的意愿及体现村民的意志,可以提高农户村域生态治理的参与度。

Abstract: Based on the micro survey data of 603 peasant households in Hubei Province,this paper incorporates social context factors of rural acquaintances and constructs a three-dimensional analysis framework of interpersonal trust, institutional trust, and group identity, and discusses the behavioral logic and influencing factors of peasant households participating in the ecological governanceof villages.The research results show that:(1)Interpersonal trust, institutional trust and group identity all have significant positive effects on farmers' participation behavior in the village ecological governance .(2)Interpersonal trust plays an intermediary role in group identity and the participation behavior of farmers in villageecological governance; at the same time, group identity plays a negative regulatory role in institutional trust and farmersparticipation behavior in village ecological governance.(3)With the acceptance of group identity, the interpersonal trust and institutional trust play an opposite role in the village ecological governance, that is, there may be an “alternative” relationship between interpersonal trust and institutional trust.Based on this, it is possible to increase farmers participation behavior  in the village ecological governance by creating a reciprocal and mutually beneficial social fashion, allowing the contents of ecological governance policies and village collective actions to better meet the needs of farmers and embody the will of villagers.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 林 康. 长江三角洲人口集聚与布局探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 654 -658 .
[2] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] 孔令强. 水电工程农村移民入股安置模式初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 185 .
[4] 陈振杰, 李满春, 刘永学. 基于GIS的桐庐县农村居民点空间格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 180 .
[5] 燕乃玲,赵秀华,虞孝感. 长江源区生态功能区划与生态系统管理[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 598 -602 .
[6] 李崇明,黄真理. 三峡水库入库污染负荷研究(Ⅰ)——蓄水前污染负荷现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 611 -622 .
[7] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .
[8] 罗小龙, 陈雯, 金志丰. 南京城郊结合部拓展的机制、问题与对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 175 .
[9] 曾海鳌, 吴敬禄. 太湖洑东流域陆地侵蚀与入湖物质通量的定量关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 707 .
[10] 陈秀芝, 朱莉莉, 郭水良. 长江口九段沙典型潮沟植物群落的物种多样性和种群生态位[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(Z2): 25 .