长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (10): 2557-2567.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202110023

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    

“三权分置”背景下多元经营主体农地利用效率——来自长江中下游地区的实证经验

徐玉婷1,黄贤金2,徐国良3,李英妮1,於冉4   

  1. (1.安徽师范大学地理与旅游学院,安徽 芜湖 241003;2.南京大学地理与海洋科学学院,江苏 南京 210023;3.江西财经大学旅游与城市管理学院,江西 南昌 330032;4.安徽农业大学经济管理学院, 安徽 合肥 230036)
  • 出版日期:2021-10-20 发布日期:2021-11-05

Agricultural land Use Efficiency of Diversified Agricultural Operators in the Background of "Three Rights Separation Policy":Empirical Experience From the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Region

XU Yu-ting1, HUANG Xian-jin2,XU Guo-liang3, LI Yin-ni1, YU Ran4   

  1. (1.School of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241003, China;2.School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China;3. School of Tourism and Urban management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330032, China; 4. College of Economics & Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036,China)

  • Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-11-05

摘要: 随着“三权分置”农地制度改革的深入,更多的非集体成员可以进入到农业生产行业,多元农业经营主体的涌现必将对我国的乡村农地利用、农业生产和社会形态产生重大的影响。根据长江中下游地区617份农业经营主体入户调研数据,采用三阶段DEA模型从产值、产量两个方面测算了不同农业经营主体的综合效率、技术效率和规模效率,得到了如下结论:从规模效率来看,产值上资本农场的表现最好,产量上家庭农场则更优;从技术效率来看,产值上传统农户最优,而产量上资本农场最高;从综合效率来看,产值上资本农场最高,产量上家庭农场最高。农地利用效率结果可以得到的政策含义是若我们的政策目标是追求的是产值,则农业经营主体扩大经营规模仍是有效的选择,资本农场的效率最高;若我们追求的是粮食产量,则家庭农场是目前最优的选择。


Abstract: With the in-depth reform of the agricultural land system, more non-collective members joined the ranks of agricultural operators. The emergence of diversified agricultural operators will have a great impact on the utilization of rural agricultural land, agricultural production and social forms in rural China. Based on the survey data of 617 rural households in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, this paper uses the three-stage DEA model to measure the overall efficiency, technical efficiency, and scale efficiency of different agricultural operators from the two aspects of output value and output. The following conclusions are obtained: from the perspective of scale efficiency, capital farms perform best in terms of output value, and family farms are better in terms of output; in terms of technical efficiency, traditional farmers are the best in terms of output values, while capital farms have the highest yields; In terms of efficiency, capital farms have the highest output value, and family farms have the highest output. The policy implication of the results is that if our policy goal is to pursue output value, it is still an effective choice for agricultural operators to expand their scale of operation, and capital farms have the highest efficiency; if we are seeking food production, then Family farms are currently the best choice.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王锐, 余涛, 杨忠芳, 侯青叶, 曾庆良, 马宏宏. 富硒土壤硒生物有效性及影响因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1460 .
[2] 付书科, 李小帆, 彭甲超, 张子悦, 陈 思. 基于动态因子分析法的长江三角洲城市群城镇化质量测度研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1909 -1918 .
[3] 刘菊 傅斌 张成虎 胡治鹏 王玉宽. 基于InVEST模型的岷江上游生态系统水源涵养量与价值评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[4] 张玉韩 吴尚昆 董延涛. 长江经济带矿产资源开发空间格局优化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 李 娟, 董 平, 陆玉麒, 王 毅, 郭 政.  

中原经济区人口与经济空间格局演变研究 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2222 -2231 .

[6] 李 述, 葛 刚, 刘琪璟.  

基于主体功能区规划的江西省城镇化协调发展研究 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2250 -2259 .

[7] 孔锋, 杨萍, 王品, 吕丽莉, 孙劭. 中国灾害性对流天气日数的时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2518 -2528 .
[8] 查凯丽, 刘艳芳, 孔雪松, 田雅丝, 刘耀林, . 村镇路网通达性与空间出行研究——以武汉市李集镇为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2663 -2672 .
[9] 起永东, 何明琼, 郑永宏, 高 洁, 王 丹, 孔繁希. 汉江流域降水结构时空特征及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2830 -2838 .
[10] 张继 周旭 蒋啸 杨江州 牛潜. 生态工程建设背景下贵州高原的植被变化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .