长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (11): 2581-2593.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202111002

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带旅游产业与生态环境交互胁迫关系验证及协调效应研究

王兆峰,陈青青*   

  1. (湖南师范大学旅游学院,湖南 长沙 410081)
  • 出版日期:2021-11-20 发布日期:2021-12-13

Study on the Verification and Coordination Effect of the Interactive Stress of Tourism Industry and Ecological Environment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

WANG Zhao-feng,CHEN Qing-qing   

  1. (Tourism College of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)
  • Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-12-13

摘要: 探究旅游产业与生态环境协调发展问题对破解长江经济带旅游业转型升级瓶颈制约和开创生态文明建设新局面至关重要。在构建系统发展状态评价指标体系的基础上,基于交互胁迫模型验证旅游产业与生态环境系统之间存在的交互胁迫关系,进而运用耦合协调模型、空间引力模型等方法对长江经济带1998年以来两系统协调发展的动态演进特征及空间联系结构进行了实证分析。结果表明:(1)长江经济带旅游产业和生态环境两大系统的评价值均呈现出增长趋势,区域间非均衡性逐渐减弱;(2)长江经济带旅游产业与生态环境之间具有交互胁迫关系,演变轨迹符合多个“S”型曲线组合的节律性发展特征;(3)长江经济带复合系统协调发展阶段大致经历了轻度失调(1998~2006年)—濒临失调(2007~2015年)—勉强协调(2016~2017年)的演变历程,耦合协调类型由旅游经济滞后型逐渐转变为系统均衡发展型;(4)区域耦合协调度空间联系格局渐趋紧密,联系势能稳步提升,整体呈“东部突出-中部隆起-西部塌陷”的阶梯式递减格局,三大分区内部也表现出显著的非均衡性特征。

Abstract: Exploring the coordinated development of the tourism industry and the eco-environment is very crucial to break the bottleneck of the transformation and upgrading of the tourism industry and initiate the new situation of ecological civilization construction in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Based on the construction of the evaluation index system of development status, this paper validates the interactive coercive relationship between tourism industry and ecological environment system based on the interactive coercion model, and then using the coupling coordination model, spatial gravity model and other methods, the dynamic evolution characteristics and spatial connection structure of the two systems in the Yangtze River Economic Zone since 1998 are analyzed empirically. The results show that: (1) The evaluation values of the two major systems of the tourism industry and the ecological environment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt both show an increasing trend, and the disequilibrium between regions gradually weakens; (2) There is an interactive stress relationship between the tourism industry and eco-environment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, and the evolution trajectory conforms to the rhythmic development characteristics of a combination of multiple S-shaped curves; (3) The coordinated development stage of the complex system of the Yangtze River Economic Belt roughly experienced the following evolution process: mild imbalance (1998-2006)-endangered imbalance (2007-2015)-rough coordination (2016-2017); (4) The spatial connection pattern of the regional coupling coordination degree of various provinces and regions is getting closer and closer, and the connection potential energy is steadily increasing. The overall pattern presents a step-type decreasing pattern of “extrude in east-uplift in central-collapse in west”, and the interior of the three major regions also shows significant non-equilibrium characteristics.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] 熊鸿斌, 周凌燕. 基于PSR-灰靶模型的巢湖环湖防洪治理工程生态环境影响评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1977 -1987 .
[3] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[4] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[5] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[6] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[7] 谢五三, 吴 蓉, 丁小俊. 基于FloodArea模型的城市内涝灾害风险评估与预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2848 -2855 .
[8] 刘晓阳 黄晓东 丁志伟. 长江经济带县域信息化水平的空间差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[10] 赵树成, 张展羽, 夏继红, 杨洁, 盛丽婷, 唐丹, 陈晓安, . 鄱阳湖滨岸土壤磷素吸附特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .