长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (11): 2607-2617.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202111004

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江中游城市群空间结构演变及效应分析

肖泽平1,钟业喜1*,冯兴华1,毛炜圣2   

  1. (1江西师范大学地理与环境学院,江西 南昌 330022;2.华东师范大学城市与区域科学学院,上海200241)
  • 出版日期:2021-11-20 发布日期:2021-12-13

Spatial Structure Evolution and Effect Analysis of Urban Agglomeration in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River

XIAO Ze-ping1, ZHONG Ye-xi1, FENG Xing-hua1, MAO Wei-sheng2   

  1. (1.School of Geography and Environment, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China;2.School of Urban & Regional Science East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)
  • Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-12-13

摘要: 城市群作为支撑区域经济高质量发展的重要载体,合理的空间结构是城市群实现空间效应最大化的重要保障。基于“密度-规模-网络”城市群空间结构分析框架,借助数理分析、空间分析和空间计量模型,测度了2007~2017年长江中游城市群空间结构时空演化特征及其多中心结构空间效应。结果表明:(1)“小经济集团”日益显著,成为城市群发展的新兴地区,环鄱阳湖城市群是全区协调发展短板,九江、新宜萍地区出现跨区融合趋势;(2)城市群形成紧密联系网络,经济联系城市组团、交通轴带性集聚显著,跨行政区联系薄弱,外围城市经济联系有待增强;(3)长江中游城市群集聚水平不高,溢出效应不显著,人力资源、工业化水平、政府参与与交通基础设施均是促进区域经济发展的正向因素,未来应促进要素梯级集聚,打破行政壁垒,增强跨区联系,完善交通网络,创造溢出新通道。

Abstract: As an important carrier to support the high-quality development of the regional economy, urban agglomerations, a reasonable spatial structure is an important guarantee for urban agglomerations to maximize their spatial effects. Based on the “density-scale-network” urban agglomeration spatial structure analysis framework, this paper uses mathematical analysis, spatial analysis and spatial measurement models to measure the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River from 2007 to 2017 and its multi-center structure spatial effects. The results show that: (1) “Small economic groups” have become increasingly prominent and have become emerging areas for the development of urban agglomerations. The Poyang Lake City Cluster is a shortcoming in the coordinated development of the entire region, and the Jiujiang and Xinyiping areas have a trend of cross-regional integration; (2) Urban agglomerations form a tightly connected network, with significant clusters of economically connected cities and significant traffic axial agglomeration, weak cross-administrative ties, and economic ties in peripheral cities need to be strengthened; (3) The level of urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River is not high, the spillover effect is not significant, and human resources, Industrialization level, government participation and transportation infrastructure are all positive factors that promote regional economic development. In the future, we should promote the clustering of factors, break administrative barriers, strengthen inter-regional connections, improve transportation networks, and create new overflow channels.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] 安俞静, 刘静玉, 李 宁, 乔墩墩, 刘梦丽. 中原城市群铁路网络可达性及经济联系格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1947 -1957 .
[3] 熊鸿斌, 周凌燕. 基于PSR-灰靶模型的巢湖环湖防洪治理工程生态环境影响评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1977 -1987 .
[4] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[5] 陈万旭 李江风 冉端. 长江中游城市群土地利用转型和城镇化之间空间关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[7] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[8] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[9] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[10] 赵树成, 张展羽, 夏继红, 杨洁, 盛丽婷, 唐丹, 陈晓安, . 鄱阳湖滨岸土壤磷素吸附特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .