长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (3): 711-724.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202203019

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    

典型贫困县乡村贫困化分异机制及对乡村振兴的启示——以安徽省阜南县为例

何莎莎1,2,方斌1,2 ,谢雪1,2   

  1. (1. 南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏 南京210023;2. 江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,江苏 南京210023)
  • 出版日期:2022-03-20 发布日期:2022-04-07

Differentiation Mechanism of Rural Poverty in Typical Poverty Stricken Counties and Its Enlightenment to Rural Revitalization:A Case Study of Funan County of Anhui Province

HE Sha-sha1,2,FANG Bin1,2 ,XIE Xue1,2   

  1. (1.School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023, China; 2.New-Type Urbanization and Rural Land Issues Research Center,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
  • Online:2022-03-20 Published:2022-04-07

摘要: 客观分析典型贫困县乡村贫困化分异机制及脱贫稳定性,是推进乡村振兴有效实施的应有之义。以安徽省阜南县为例,结合村域和农户两种尺度剖析典型贫困县乡村贫困化成因,并基于研究区自身特色探讨其脱贫稳定性与乡村振兴的衔接机制,结果表明:(1)阜南县各乡镇贫困村核密度差异显著,总体呈外密内疏之势,部分区域呈核心面状式集聚分布,按照核密度值将贫困村分为5个一级核心区、4个二级核心区和5个三级核心区。(2)从村域尺度分析,残疾户占比和生病户占比等发展潜力因素,遭灾占比、到县城和乡镇中心、主要干道的距离和村平均高程等区位条件因素是影响农村致贫的主导因素;从农户尺度探究,行政村属性、贫困户属性、家庭规模、残疾或疾病、劳动力占比和外出务工占比是研究区农户致贫的显著因素。(3)综合村域层面和农户层面分析,外出务工结合区域资源禀赋发展特色农业以增强贫困村内生动力和贫困户生计水平,是推动研究区脱贫可持续发展的关键;从产业、人才、文化、生态和组织等5大核心要义探讨乡村振兴与精准扶贫的衔接机制,旨在为该地区乡村振兴精准施策提供依据。

Abstract: Objective analysis of the rural poverty differentiation mechanism and the stability of poverty alleviation in typical poverty-stricken counties is necessary to promote the effective implementation of Rural Revitalization. Taking Funan County in Anhui Province as a typical case, this article analyzes the causes of rural impoverishment in typical poverty-stricken counties by combining village and farmer scales, and discusses the connection mechanism between poverty alleviation stability and Rural Revitalization based on the characteristics of the study area. The results are as follows: (1) There are significant differences in the density of poverty-stricken villages in various towns of Funan County, with the overall trend of being dense outside and sparse inside, and some areas are concentrated in the core area, According to the nuclear density, the poor villages are divided into five primary core areas, four secondary core areas and five tertiary core areas.(2) From the village scale analysis, the development potential factors, such as the proportion of disabled households and sick households, and the location factors, such as the proportion of disaster, the distance to the county and Township Center, the distance to the main road and the average elevation of the village, are the leading factors affecting rural poverty; From the perspective of the scale of farmers, the attributes of administrative village, poor households, family size, whether the family has disabilities or diseases, the proportion of labor force and the proportion of migrant workers are the significant factors of poverty in the study area.(3) Based on the analysis of village level and peasant household level, it is the key to promote the sustainable development of poverty alleviation in the study area to develop characteristic agriculture in combination with regional resource endowment in order to enhance the endogenous driving force of poor villages and the livelihood level of poor households; This article discusses the connection mechanism between Rural Revitalization and targeted poverty alleviation from the five core points of industry, talent, culture, ecology and organization, aiming to provide the basis for the accurate implementation of Rural Revitalization in the region.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 卢德彬 毛婉柳 杨东阳 赵佳楠. 基于多源遥感数据的中国PM2.5变化趋势与影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[2] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[4] 刘冀, 孙周亮, 张特, 程雄, 董晓华, 谈新. 基于不同卫星降雨产品的澴水花园流域径流模拟比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2558 -2567 .
[5] 谢五三, 吴 蓉, 丁小俊. 基于FloodArea模型的城市内涝灾害风险评估与预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2848 -2855 .
[6] 刘雁慧 李阳兵. 中国水资源承载力评价及变化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 胡博亭, 柳江, 王文玲, 冯彦. 基于洪旱灾害的雅鲁藏布江流域水资源脆弱性时空差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1092 -1101 .
[8] 程俊翔, 徐力刚, 姜加虎, 朱乾德, 于丹丹. 洞庭湖出口径流变化及对生态系统的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1225 -1234 .
[9] 夏四友 赵媛 文琦 许昕 崔盼盼. 近20年来中国农业碳排放强度区域差异、时空格局及动态演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[10] 刘 松, 佘敦先, 张利平, 丁凯熙, 郭梦瑶, 陈森林. 基于Morris和Sobol的水文模型参数敏感性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1296 -1303 .