长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (2): 427-439.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202302018

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

撂荒地喜旱莲子草入侵群落特征与种间联结研究

南倩茹,张晴,张劲,陈红兵,李兆华,赵丽娅*   

  1. (湖北大学资源环境学院,湖北 武汉 430062)
  • 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2023-03-09

Investigation into Community Characteristics and Interspecific Association of Alternanthera philoxeroides in the Abandoned Farmlands

NAN Qian-ru,ZHANG Qing,ZHANG Jin,CHEN Hong-bing,LI Zhao-hua,ZHAO Li-ya   

  1. (School of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)
  • Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-03-09

摘要: 喜旱莲子草(Alternanthera philoxeroides)是一种外来多年生杂草,其入侵给我国生态系统和社会经济造成巨大损失。为有效观测与评估撂荒地喜旱莲子草入侵的危害程度,以江汉平原湖区不同撂荒年限的喜旱莲子草入侵群落为研究对象,在江汉平原湖区设置60个1 m×1 m样方(撂荒1年、撂荒3年、撂荒5年各20个),采用χ2检验、联结系数、匹配系数、Spearman秩相关系数与Gordon M稳定性测度法分别对其种间联结性与群落稳定性进行研究,结果表明:(1)撂荒1年群落物种数共32科57属62种,撂荒3年群落物种数共26科54属61种,撂荒5年群落物种数共23科45属49种,三类群落均以禾本科(Gramineae)和菊科(Asteraceae)植物为主,喜旱莲子草与稗(Echinochloa crusgalli)的优势度占据主体地位,且与撂荒1年相比,撂荒3年和撂荒5年群落中入侵植物喜旱莲子草的优势度分别增长3.031%和8.408%。(2) 从VR值来看,撂荒1年喜旱莲子草入侵群落呈不显著负关联,撂荒3年和5年群落均呈显著正关联。χ2检验和AC值显示,喜旱莲子草、稗和狗牙根(Cynodon dactylon)对环境条件有相似的适应性,其余物种对喜旱莲子草入侵的抵抗力较弱。(3)χ2检验与Spearman秩相关分析表明,三类喜旱莲子草入侵群落的种对间联结松散,种间相对独立。群落稳定性结果显示,撂荒1年、撂荒3年和撂荒5年群落的交点坐标分别为(32.52,67.48)、(32.93,67.07)和(32.09,67.91),三者均离理想稳定点坐标(20,80)有一定距离,表明种群间存在较为激烈的竞争。综上,建议在撂荒地修复治理过程中采用替代控制法,以稗、狗牙根等禾本科植物作为替代物种,对撂荒地喜旱莲子草进行综合治理。

Abstract: Alternanthera philoxeroides is an exotic perennial weed whose invasion has caused great damage to our ecosystem and socio-economy. To effectively observe and assess the extent of the invasion of Alternanthera philoxeroides on abandoned farmlands, the Chi-square test, association coefficient, match coefficient, Spearman rank correlation coefficient, and Gordon M's stability measure were used to study the interspecific association and community stability in 60 plots with a specification of 1 m ×1 m (20 each for 1 year of abandonment, 3 years of abandonment and 5 years of abandonment) set up in Jianghan Plain Lake Area.The results indicated that:(1)The number of species in the communities abandoned for 1 year was 62 belonging to 32 families and 57 genera, in the communities abandoned for 3 years was 61 belonging to 26 families and 54 genera and in the communities abandoned for 5 years was 49 belonging to 23 families and 45 genera. Gramineae and Asteraceae were the main species in the three communities, where the dominance of Alternanthera philoxeroides and Echinochloa crusgalli was remarkable.Compared to 1 year of abandonment, the dominance of the invasive plant Alternanthera philoxeroides in the communities increased by 3.031% and 8.408% in 3 and 5 years of abandonment, respectively. (2)From the VR value, there was a non-significant negative association for the invasive communities of Alternanthera philoxeroides for 1 year of abandonment and a significant positive association for both 3 and 5 years of abandonment. Chi-square tests and AC values showed that Alternanthera philoxeroides, Echinochloa crusgalli, and Cynodon dactylon were similarly adapted to environmental conditions, and the remaining species were less resistant to Alternanthera philoxeroides invasion. (3)Chi-square tests and Spearman rank correlation analysis reflected that the three types of Alternanthera philoxeroides invasive communities were loosely linked between species pairs and relatively independent between species. The community stability results showed that the intersection coordinates of the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year communities were (32.52, 67.48), (32.93, 67.07) and (32.09, 67.91), respectively, all three of which were some distance from the ideal stability point coordinates (20, 80), indicating that there was more intense competition among the populations.Therefore, it is recommended that alternative control methods should be used in the restoration and management of abandoned farmlands, with Echinochloa crusgalli and Cynodon dactylon as alternative species for the integrated management of Alternanthera philoxeroides in abandoned farmlands.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 吴四平, 杨叶, 娄淑兰, . 峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1809 .
[2] 何松蔚, 王成刚, 姜海梅, 曹乐, 王新伟. 2015年冬季苏州城市热岛特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2078 .
[3] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[4] 马小亮, 刘桂民, 吴晓东, 徐海燕, 叶琳琳, 张晓兰. 三江源高寒草甸下溪流溶解性有机碳的季节性输移特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2387 -2394 .
[5] 苏 芳, 郑亚萍, 阚立娜, 蔡 莎. 基于CVM调查法评估城市公共绿地服务价值 ——以西部省会城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2434 -2442 .
[6] 朱立一, 何伟, 朱璧然, . 纳米二氧化硅和铅复合暴露对 斑马鱼幼鱼甲状腺内分泌系统的毒性影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2588 -2596 .
[7] 刘莲, 刘红兵, 汪涛, 朱波, 姜世伟. 三峡库区消落带农用坡地磷素径流流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2609 -2618 .
[8] 孙殿臣, 王慧敏, 黄 晶, 刘高峰, . 鄱阳湖流域城市洪涝灾害风险及土地类型调整策略研究 ——以景德镇市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2856 -2866 .
[9] 胡兴坤, 高 雷, 杨 浩, 刘绍平, 陈大庆, 段辛斌 . 长江中游黄石江段鱼类早期资源现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 60 -67 .
[10] 胡晓, 余英俊, 魏永才, 洪亮, 张永年, 石小涛, 吴睿. 基于过鱼效果评估的涵洞鱼道堰式挡板性能研究与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 134 -143 .