长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (12): 2856-2866.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201812022

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄱阳湖流域城市洪涝灾害风险及土地类型调整策略研究 ——以景德镇市为例

孙殿臣1,2,王慧敏1,2,黄  晶1,2*,刘高峰1,3   

  1. (1. 河海大学水文水资源与水利工程学科国家重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;2. 河海大学管理科学研究所,江苏 南京 211100;3. 河海大学企业管理学院,江苏 常州 213022)
  • 出版日期:2018-12-20 发布日期:2018-12-29

Analysis of Urban Flood Disaster Risk in the Poyang Lake Basin and Land Type Adjustment Strategy Study  —— A Case Study of Jingdezhen City

SUN Dian-chen1,2,WANG Hui-min1,2,HUANG Jing1,2,LIU Gao-feng1,3   

  1. (1. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 2. Management Science Institute of Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 3. School of Business Administration, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China)
  • Online:2018-12-20 Published:2018-12-29

摘要:  在全球气候变化和人类活动影响下,流域内城市洪涝灾害发生的频率、强度及其造成的损失日益加剧,更好的揭示洪涝灾害风险的时空演变规律对不同流域下城市防灾减灾具有重要意义。基于流域城市洪涝灾害风险的形成过程,从致灾因子、孕灾环境、承灾体、防灾减灾能力4个方面选取指标,构建了基于格网的流域城市小尺度洪涝灾害风险评价模型,并以景德镇市城区为例,将空间风险定量计算,分析了城市洪涝风险的时空分异特征,最后提出土地利用类型的调整策略。结果表明:从空间上,城区洪涝灾害风险极大值与极小值差值存在较大的差异,呈现由昌江、南河、西河等河流为中心向四周逐渐减小的方向性变化,不同区域的风险波动性幅度不同,社会经济发展水平较高的珠山区昌江沿岸区域为景德镇城区的洪涝灾害高风险区,西部、西南部山区以及东部乡镇由于地势较高,风险水平较低。从时间上,景德镇市城区的洪涝灾害风险最大值呈下降趋势,南部洪涝灾害风险整体变小,但风险集中程度不断加剧,城区西部风险值有小幅度的上升;针对不同的区域特征,通过两种方案对城区内洪涝灾害易涝典型地区进行土地利用类型调整,两个区域风险分别从0.606与0.610降低到0.561与0.571。

Abstract: Due to the influence of global climate change and severe human activities, the frequency and intensity of urban flood disasters in basin are increasing frequently. Because of various urban development of cities in the Poyanghu Basin, the land use structure was forced to change. Because of the rapid urban development in Poyanghu Basin, the land use structure changes continuously. Meanwhile, some unreasonable land use type increased the risk of flood disaster. It’s significant and necessary to study and reveal the spatial-temporal distribution of the flood risk in the different basin. The study can be used as a support tool to help local stakeholders make future flood risk prevention and reduction planning, and flood disaster management. In this study, the urban region of Jingdezhen City in Poyanghu Basin was selected as the study area. Firstly, the formation of flood risk and the causes of flood disasters in cities of basin were analyzed. Secondly, based on the formation process of urban flood risk in Basin, the assessment index was set up from four main aspects (disaster-causing factors, disaster-pregnant environment, disaster-bearing body and the prevention and mitigation ability). Thirdly, a small-scale flood disaster risk assessment model was developed based on Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and Geographic Information System(GIS). Finally, taking the urban area of Jingdezhen as a case, the spatial risk was calculated quantitatively. And the adjustment strategies of land use type in the typical flood disaster affected areas were put forward according to the spatial-temporal distribution of flood disaster risk. The results showed that there was a big difference between the maximum and minimum values of flood disaster risk in urban areas from the perspective of space. The risk decreased gradually from the center line of Urban River to the surrounding. The range of risk volatility in different regions was different. The Changjiang coastal area of Zhushan District which has high social and economic development level were the high-risk areas and the risk level was low in western, southwest and eastern towns. From the perspective of time, the maximum value of flood disaster risk in the urban city decreased from 2010 to 2013 while the local areas of high flood disaster risk were more concentred. The risk of flood disaster in the South became smaller as a whole. The value of flood disaster risk in the western part of the city increased slightly. According to the different regional characteristics, two hypothetical adjustments were adopted to change the land use types in the typical flood areas in the basin. After calculating the average value of flood disaster risk, the value of flood disaster risk in two regions decreased from 0.606 and 0.610 to 0.561 (7.4%)and 0.571(6.4%) respectively.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 沈德福,史学正,吕成文,于东升. 江苏沿江地区土壤肥力空间分布及其区域对比研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 316 -321 .
[2] 李燕玲, 刘爱民. 长江流域冬季农业主要作物的耕地竞争机制及案例研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 146 .
[3] 解晓南,许朋柱,秦伯强. 太湖流域苏锡常地区地面沉降若干问题探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 125 -131 .
[4] 彭长青,冯金飞,卞新民. 基于遗传算法和GIS的县域水田种植制度空间布局优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 66 -70 .
[5] 刘爱霞,刘正军,王 静. 基于PCA变换和神经元网络分类方法的中国森林制图研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 19 -24 .
[6] 郑明媚,李满春,毛 亮,黎韶光. GIS支持的县域人口迁移空间模型研究——以浙江省临安市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 281 -286 .
[7] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[8] 蔡邦成,陆根法,宋莉娟,陈克亮. 南水北调东线水源地保护区生态建设的生态经济效益评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 384 -387 .
[9] 王学雷,许厚泽,蔡述明. 长江中下游湿地保护与流域生态管理[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 564 -568 .
[10] 李书恒, 郭 伟, 施晓冬, 朱大奎. 舟山群岛海洋环境资源及其开发利用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 425 .