长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (7): 1479-1490.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202307011

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

丹江口水库蓄水前后汉江中游水文干旱演变特征分析

王欣贝1,彭涛1,2*,由星莹3,4,刘伯娟4,董晓华1,2,郭家力1,2,林青霞1,2,刘冀1,2,王高旭5
  

  1. (1. 三峡大学水利与环境学院,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 三峡库区生态环境教育部工程研究中心,湖北 宜昌 443002;3. 湖北省汉江兴隆水利枢纽管理局,湖北 潜江 433126;4. 湖北省水利水电规划勘测设计院,湖北 武汉 430070;5. 南京水利科学研究院,江苏 南京 210029)
  • 出版日期:2023-07-20 发布日期:2023-07-21

Evolution Characteristics of Hydrological Drought in the Middle Reaches of Hanjiang River Before and After the Impoundment of the Danjiangkou Reservoir

WANG Xin-bei1, PENG Tao1,2, YOU Xing-ying3,4, LIU Bo-juan4,  DONG Xiao-hua1,2, GUO Jia-li1,2, LIN Qing-xia1,2, LIU Ji1,2, WANG Gao-xu5   

  1. (1. College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China; 
    2. Engineering Research Center of Eco-enviroment in Three Gorges Reservoir Region,Ministry of Education, Yichang 443002, China; 3. Hubei Hanjiang Water Conservancy Project Management Bureau, Qianjiang 433126, China; 4. Hubei Institute of 
    water resources and survey and design, Wuhan 440070, China; 5. Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China)
  • Online:2023-07-20 Published:2023-07-21

摘要: 开展水库径流调节作用下水文干旱演变研究对于干旱监测和水资源管理具有重要意义。利用1956~2020年汉江中游黄家港和皇庄2个水文站逐月实测径流资料,选用标准化径流指数(SRI)对丹江口水库运行前后水文干旱演变特征进行分析,基于Copula函数评估水文干旱特征变量联合概率和重现期的变化。结果表明:(1) 与丹江口水库蓄水前相比,蓄水后2个站冬季旱情明显趋缓,而夏秋季干旱略有加重,其中黄家港站表现尤为明显;(2) 蓄水后黄家港站轻旱事件的发生频率明显增加,而皇庄站轻旱略有增加,但2个站的中、重和特旱事件发生频率均显著减少;(3) 就干旱历时和烈度平均值而言,蓄水后黄家港站有所增加,皇庄站则略有减少。从烈度峰值平均值来看,蓄水后2个站均有不同程度的降低;(4) 在给定某一重现期下,蓄水后2个站干旱特征变量的联合重现期总体呈现增加趋势,而同现重现期整体表现为下降趋势;(5) 在来水偏枯年份,丹江口水库加大下泄流量可一定程度上缓解汉江中下游冬春季旱情,但汛末蓄水减少了下游河道径流量,则有可能会加重旱情。


Abstract: It is of great significance for drought monitoring and water resources management to study the evolution of hydrological drought under the effect of reservoir runoff regulation. Based on the monthly measured runoff data from 1956 to 2020 at Huangjiagang and Huangzhuang stations in the middle reaches of Hanjiang River, the standardized runoff index(SRI) was used to analyse the hydrological drought changes before and after the Danjiangkou(DJK) Reservoir impoundment. The variations of joint probability and return period of hydrological drought characteristic variables were evaluated based on Copula function. Results indicated that:(1) Compared with that before the DJK Reservoir impoundment, the drought situations in winter at the two hydrological stations after operation of the DJK Reservoir were significantly reduced, while the drought conditions in summer and autumn were slightly aggravated, especially at Huangjiagang station;(2) After the impoundment of the DJK Reservoir, the frequency of light drought events at Huangjiagang station increased significantly, and that in Huangzhuang station increased slightly, while the frequency of moderate, severe and extreme drought events at the two hydrological stations decreased significantly;(3) As for the average value of drought duration and severity, Huangjiagang station increased and Huangzhuang station decreased slightly after operation of the DJK Reservoir. From the average value of drought peak, the two hydrological stations decreased in varying degrees after impoundment of the DJK Reservoir;(4) Given a certain return period, the joint return period of drought characteristic variables of the two hydrological stations after impoundment showed an increasing trend, while the co-occurrence return period exhibited a downward trend as a whole;(5) In dry years, increasing the outflow of the DJK Reservoir can alleviate winter and spring drought conditions in the middle-lower reaches of Hanjiang River to some extent, but the impoundment of the reservoir at the end of the flood season reduces the streamflow of the downstream river, which may aggravate the drought condition.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙惠惠, 章新平, 罗紫东, 尚程鹏, 贺新光, 饶志国.  近53 a来长江流域极端降水指数特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1879 .
[2] 李雪松 龙湘雪 齐晓旭. 长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 何松蔚, 王成刚, 姜海梅, 曹乐, 王新伟. 2015年冬季苏州城市热岛特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2078 .
[4] 方琳, 吴凤平, 王新华, 余燕团.  

基于共同前沿SBM模型的农业用水效率测度及改善潜力 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2293 -2304 .

[5] 刘莲, 刘红兵, 汪涛, 朱波, 姜世伟. 三峡库区消落带农用坡地磷素径流流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2609 -2618 .
[6] 孙殿臣, 王慧敏, 黄 晶, 刘高峰, . 鄱阳湖流域城市洪涝灾害风险及土地类型调整策略研究 ——以景德镇市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2856 -2866 .
[7] 罗若愚 钟易霖. 成都市社会空间结构演变研究(2000~2010)[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[8] 胡思 曾祎 王磊 贺新光. 长江流域极端降水的区域频率及时空特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 吕乐婷, 王晓蕊, 孙才志, 张 杰. 基于SWAT模型的细河流域蓝水绿水资源量时空分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 39 -47 .
[10] 李艳, 马百胜, 杨宣. 两类ENSO事件对中国东部地区极端降水的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 469 -482 .