长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (11): 2371-2382.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202311012

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

跨流域调水三方合作博弈生态补偿研究——以南水北调中线工程为例

周申蓓,李嘉欣*,张子霞   

  1. (河海大学商学院,江苏 南京 211100)
  • 出版日期:2023-11-20 发布日期:2023-11-28

Ecological Compensation of Tripartite Cooperative Game of Inter-basin Water Diversion: A Case Study of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project

ZHOU Shen-bei,LI Jia-xin,ZHANG Zi-xia   

  1. (Business School of Hohai University, Hohai University,Nanjing 211100 ,China)
  • Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-11-28

摘要: 协调跨流域调水工程各利益主体的利益关系是跨流域调水生态补偿的核心。为保障补偿的合理性和可实施性,推动工程效益可持续发挥,从合作博弈的角度出发,以南水北调中线工程为例,通过梳理工程运行过程中受水区、水源区和下游区之间用水和排污的响应关系,基于Shapley值法构建了各主体间成本共担、收益共享的跨流域调水工程横向生态补偿标准。研究结果表明:(1)2019~2021年,受水区所需要支付的生态补偿总额分别为55.26、54.83和63.96亿元,且北京市和天津市所需要支付的补偿金额较高;(2)受外调水优化配置和经济发展水平的共同影响,北京市、河北省和河南省的水资源价值呈上升趋势;(3)水源区和下游地区获得的补偿资金在弥补了其自身部分调水损失的同时随受水区调水收益的增加而增加,这有利于进一步提高合作的稳定性。总的来看,研究从合作的角度揭示了跨流域调水工程水资源优化配置的机理,为工程利益平衡机制的确定以及补偿标准的核算提供了可行的思路。

Abstract: The core of ecological compensation for inter-basin water transfer project is to coordinate the interest relationship of various stakeholders.In order to ensure the reasonableness and implementability of compensation and promote the sustainable performance of project benefits, from the perspective of cooperative game, the middle Route of South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) project was taken as an example in this study. A horizontal ecological compensation standard of inter-basin water transfer project was constructed,based on the Shapley value method by sorting out the response relationship of water use and sewage emissions between the water receiving area, water source area and downstream affected area during the operation of the project and sharing the cost and benefit among the subjects . The results showed that: (1) from 2019 to 2021, the annual ecological compensation required to be paid by the water receiving area was 5.526 billion yuan, 5.483 billion yuan and 6.396 billion yuan respectively. The compensation amount required to be paid by Beijing and Tianjin was higher than other cities; (2)Under the joint influence of the optimal allocation of transferred water and the level of economic development, the value of water resources in Beijing, Hebei and Henan provinces tended to increase, while that in Tianjin city tended to decrease;(3)The compensation funds received by the source and downstream areas made up for some of their own water transfer losses.The funds increased with the increasing benefits of water transfer in the receiving area, which helped to further improve the stability of cooperation. Overall, this study revealed the mechanism of optimal allocation of water resources in inter-basin water transfer projects from the perspective of cooperation, and provided a feasible idea for the determination of the balancing mechanism of project benefits and the accounting of compensation standards.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[2] 张梦薇, 吕成文. 丰乐河流域表层土壤有机碳空间变异特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1420 .
[3] 李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 吴四平, 杨叶, 娄淑兰, . 峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1809 .
[4] 李雪松 龙湘雪 齐晓旭. 长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 田雨 周宝同 付伟 王蓉. 2000-2015年山地城市土地利用景观格局动态演变研究—以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 刘莲, 刘红兵, 汪涛, 朱波, 姜世伟. 三峡库区消落带农用坡地磷素径流流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2609 -2618 .
[7] 孙殿臣, 王慧敏, 黄 晶, 刘高峰, . 鄱阳湖流域城市洪涝灾害风险及土地类型调整策略研究 ——以景德镇市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2856 -2866 .
[8] 梁辉 王春凯. 201904产业发展对城市蔓延影响的差异性分析—以长江经济带104个城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 李雪松, 龙湘雪, 齐晓旭. 长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 505 -516 .
[10] 王 倩, 王云琦, 马 超, 王 彬, 李一凡. 缙云山针阔混交林碳通量变化特征及影响因子研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 565 -576 .