长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (6): 1298-1312.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202406014

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带雾霾治理、绿色技术创新与低碳高质量发展协调性研究

朱超平1,2 ,苏艺璇1,范如国3   

  1. (1.江西师范大学软件学院,江西 南昌 330022; 2.江西师范大学管理决策评价研究中心,江西 南昌 330022;3.武汉大学经济与管理学院,湖北 武汉 430072)
  • 出版日期:2024-06-20 发布日期:2024-06-26

Study on the Coordination of Haze Governance, Green Technology Innovation and Low-Carbon High-Quality Development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

ZHU Chao-ping1,2,SU Yi-xuan1,FAN Ru-guo3   

  1. (1. School of Software, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China; 2. Research Center of Management Decision and Evaluation, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China; 3. School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)
  • Online:2024-06-20 Published:2024-06-26

摘要: 长江经济带各省市在生态、创新和经济等领域存在不平衡不协调的发展问题,深入探究三者的协调关系具有重要理论和实践价值。基于超效率SBM-DEA模型、熵权-线性加权法和熵权-TOPSIS等方法,分别测算了2009~2020年长江经济带各省市雾霾治理效率、绿色技术创新指数和低碳高质量发展指数,并运用耦合协调度模型分析了这三者作为一个三元系统的耦合协调度。结果表明:(1)在省域和区域层面,雾霾治理效率与绿色技术创新指数、低碳高质量发展指数均存在显著差异;(2)三元系统的耦合协调度总体呈上升趋势,表现出正向空间溢出效应和“东高中低”的空间分异特征;(3)不同省市之间的协调水平差距具有异质性,但随着时间的推移,区域之间的差异逐渐减小。据此,提出了优化资源和要素配置、制定差异化精准提升策略以及建立跨区域协作机制等政策建议,以促进长江经济带的协调发展。

Abstract: The provinces and cities located in the Yangtze River Economic Belt are confronted with unbalanced and uncoordinated developments in the fields of ecology, innovation, and the economy sectors. An examination of the coordination relationships within these three areas may have significant importance for both theoretical and practical purposes. Using multiple empirical analysis methods, including the Super-Efficiency SBM-DEA model, the Entropy Weight Linear Weighting method, and the Entropy Weight TOPSIS method, this study respectively evaluated the haze governance efficiency, the green technology innovation index, and the low-carbon high-quality development index of the provinces and cities along the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2009 to 2020. The coordination between these three aspects was also explored, based on the coupling coordination degree model. The results indicated that: (1) The haze governance efficiency significantly differed from the green technology innovation index and the low-carbon high-quality development index at both the provincial and regional levels. (2) The coupling coordination of the ternary system displayed an overall increasing trend, with a positive spatial spillover effect and a spatial differentiation identified as "higher in the eastern region and lower in the central region". (3) The gap in coordination among the provinces and cities exhibited heterogeneity, but the divergences between regions were reducing over time. Based on these findings, this article put forward several proposals for enhancing the coordinated growth of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. These proposals included the optimization of resource and factor allocation, the design of tailored and targeted improvement strategies, and the implementation of cross-regional collaboration mechanisms.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[2] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[3] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[4] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[5] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[6] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[7] 佘颖, 刘耀彬. 国内外绿色发展制度演化的历史脉络及启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[8] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[9] 伍文琪, 罗贤, 黄玮。李运刚. 云南省水资源承载力评价与时空分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[10] 王辉, 延军平, 王鹏涛, 武亚群. 多民族地区经济差异的空间格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1390 .