长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (9): 1860-1873.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202409003

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带区域经济综合水平的多尺度时空演化特征及驱动机理

江孝君,王小艳*   

  1. (唐山师范学院,河北 唐山 063000)
  • 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2024-09-23

Characteristics of Multi-scale Spatio-temporal Evolution and Driving Mechanisms of Regional Economic Comprehensive Level in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

JIANG Xiao-jun,WANG Xiao-yan   

  1. (School of Tangshan Normal University, Tangshan 063000, China)
  • Online:2024-09-20 Published:2024-09-23

摘要:
摘要: 以推动经济综合实力提升为核心促进长江经济带实现高质量发展是推动形成新时代区域协调格局的关键,以此为出发点构建区域经济综合水平测度体系,从多尺度和多机制视角解析了2001~2020年长江经济带区域经济综合水平时空演化特征及驱动机理。结果表明:(1)区域经济差异呈波动下降趋势,尺度差异表现为省级>地级>区级的格局,即省级尺度区域经济发展失衡明显,地级内部发展相对均衡。(2)区域经济发展呈正向集聚特征,地级尺度效应明显,空间关联格局稳定性强,由下游到上游呈圈层式热冷点集聚分布;空间分类以中低水平区为主体,由低水平到高水平呈面状集聚+点状镶嵌的分布格局;路径依赖型为空间演化主体。(3)区域经济空间分异特征明显,呈集聚化特征,沿海及沿江城市发展水平较高;集群化特征,城市群城市发展相对较优;等级化特征,城市行政等级越高发展相对越好;职能化特征,综合型城市优于资源型城市;阶梯化特征,东部城市优于中西部。(4)区位、经济、社会、政治等多方面因素及因子共同作用于不同空间尺度区域经济差异时空演化。(5)经济带经济高质量发展必须围绕系统性提升推动区域整体发展、围绕经济带战略推动区域空间协调、围绕高质量发展推动区域政策落实。

Abstract: High-quality development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt with the promotion of comprehensive economic strength as the core is the key to achieve a new era of regional coordination pattern. Based on this, a regional economic comprehensive level measurement system was constructed in this paper. The spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and the driving mechanisms of the regional economic comprehensive level of the Yangtze River Economic Belt were analyzed from a multi-scale and multi-mechanism perspective from 2001 to 2020. The results indicated that: (1) Regional economic differences showed a fluctuating downward trend, with scale differences of provincial-level>prefecture level>district level, which indicated a significant imbalance in regional economic development at the provincial level. Internal development at the prefecture level was shown as relatively balanced. (2) The development of regional economy showed a positive agglomeration feature, with obvious regional scale effects and strong spatial correlation pattern stability. There was a circular hot and cold point agglomeration distribution from downstream to upstream; The spatial classification was mainly based on low to medium level areas, with a distribution pattern of planar agglomeration and point inlay from low to high levels; Path dependent was the subject of spatial evolution. (3) The spatial differentiation of regional economy was obvious, exhibiting agglomeration characteristics. The development level of coastal and riverside cities was relatively high; In term of clustering characteristics, urban agglomerations had a higher development; In terms of hierarchical characteristics, the higher administrative level of a city had a better development; In term of functional characteristics, comprehensive cities were superior to resource-based cities; In terms of stepped features, the eastern cities were superior to the central and western regions. (4) Multiple factors of location, economy, society, and politics acted together in influencing the spatiotemporal evolution of regional economic differences at different spatial scales. (5) The high-quality development of the economic belt economy should resolve issues of making systematic improvement to promote overall regional development, implementing economic belt strategy to promote regional spatial coordination, and strengthening regional policies to promote high-quality development.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!