长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (09): 2066-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202509014

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

南水北调中线工程水源区县域生态效率变化及驱动因素

薛宝琪   

  1. (南阳师范学院地理科学与旅游学院,河南 南阳 473061)
  • 出版日期:2025-09-20 发布日期:2025-09-22

Variation of County-level Eco-Efficiency and Driving Factors in the Water Source Area of Middle Route Project of S-N Water Diversion

XUE Bao-qi   

  1. (School of Environment Science & Tourism, Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang 473061, China)
  • Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-09-22

摘要: 探究南水北调水源区县域生态效率变化及其驱动因素,对于推进水源区县域绿色发展、促进水源区人与自然和谐共生,确保南水北调水质安全具有重要意义。运用非径向非角度Super-SBM模型对2008~2022年南水北调中线工程水源区43个县(区、市)生态效率进行测算,并用Malmquist生产率指数揭示其内外部驱动因素。结果表明:2008~2022年南水北调中线工程水源区县域生态效率总体呈波动下降的特点,处于中等偏下水平;陕西、湖北、河南3个板块县域生态效率变动趋势与全区总体大体一致;全区县域生态效率总体呈“东北低—西南高” 分布格局,县域生态低效率区与县域生态较高效率区聚集连片分布,县域生态高效率区和县域生态较低效率区分布相对分散;县域生态效率损失的主要原因是资源投入过多、污染物排放过量,财政资金不足也是原因之一;纯技术效率变化指数(PEC)和技术进步变化指数(TC)处于进步状态,而规模效率变化指数(SEC)则呈倒退状态;县域生态效率提升主要受政府宏观调控与管理以及科技进步的影响,而规模经济因素则难以发挥作用。

Abstract: It is of great significance to promote green development and harmonious coexistence between humans and nature in order to ensure the safety of water quality in the Project of S-N Water Diversion. The changes in county-level eco-efficiency and their driving factors were explored for the water source area of Middle Route Project of S-N Water Diversion. The non-radial and non-angular super-SBM model were used to calculate the eco-efficiency of 43 counties (districts and cities) in the water source area of Middle Route Project of S-N Water Diversion from 2008 to 2022. The Malmquist Index was used to reveal the internal and external driving factors. The results indicated that the county-level eco-efficiency showed a fluctuating decline from 2008 to 2022. Overall, it was at a moderate to lower level. The trend of county-level eco-efficiency in Shanxi, Hubei, and Henan provinces was generally consistent with the overall trend of the entire region. The overall county-level eco-efficiency showed a distribution pattern of “low in northeast and high in southwest”. The low and high county-level eco-efficiency areas were clustered and connected, while the high and the much lower county-level eco-efficiency areas were relatively scattered. The main reasons for the loss of county-level eco-efficiency included the excessive resource investment and excessive pollutant emissions. The insufficient fiscal fund was also one of the reasons for the loss of county-level eco-efficiency. The PEC Index and the TC index were in a progressive state, but the SEC Index was in a regressive state, which indicated that the improvement of county-level eco-efficiency in the study area was mainly influenced by government macroeconomic regulation and management as well as technological progress. However, the scale economy factors were found to be difficult to play a role in improving county-level eco-efficiency in the water source area of Middle Route Project of S-N Water Diversion.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!