长江流域资源与环境 >> 2026, Vol. 35 >> Issue (1): 43-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202601004

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长三角地区产业结构优化与绿色发展水平互动关联分析

汪德慧1,乔伟峰1,2,3*,唐  娟1,李  琛1   

  1. (1.南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏 南京 210023;2. 江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,江苏 南京 210023;3. 南京师范大学乡村振兴研究院,江苏 南京 210023)
  • 出版日期:2026-01-20 发布日期:2026-01-20

Interactive Relationship Between Industrial Structure Optimization and the Level of Green Development in the Yangtze River Delta

WANG De-hui1, QIAO Wei-feng1,2,3, TANG Juan1, LI Chen1   

  1. (1.School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; 2. Jiangsu Province Geographic Information Resources Development and Utilization of Gollaborative Innovation Center, Nanjing 210023,China; 3. Research Institute of Rural Revitalization of Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)
  • Online:2026-01-20 Published:2026-01-20

摘要:  在“质量强国”和“美丽中国”的建设背景下,协同推进区域产业转型升级与绿色发展成为必要之举。以长三角41市为研究对象,运用面板向量自回归(PVAR)模型,借助脉冲响应函数(IRF)和方差分解等方法,分析2006~2019年长三角地区产业结构与绿色发展的双向互动关系,结果表明:(1)长三角地区产业结构整体向高级化和合理化方向演变,但地区内部仍不平衡、不协调。上海、苏南、浙北地区部分城市及安徽少数城市实现了产业结构合理化与高级化的同步提升,地区差异显著;(2)长三角地区绿色发展水平整体呈上升态势,但存在平稳上升和波动式前进的差异,上海和各省省会城市的绿色发展水平持续提升,安徽省相对滞后,波动明显。技术进步是制约长三角地区绿色发展水平提升的主要因素;(3)长三角地区产业结构优化与绿色发展间呈现“短期抑制、长期协同”的动态特征,并且两者均存在显著的自我驱动性,其中产业结构合理化对绿色发展的解释力度比高级化更强。研究结论可为长三角地区高质量协同发展提供科学参考,同时为探索经济增长与生态改善的双赢发展模式提供理论支撑。

Abstract: Against the backdrop of China’s "Prospering the Nation with Quality" and "Beautiful China" initiatives, the co-evolution of regional industrial upgrading and green development has become imperative. Drawing on panel data for the 41 cities of the Yangtze River Delta from 2006 to 2019, this study employed a panel vector autoregression (PVAR) model, impulse response functions (IRF) and forecast-error variance decompositions to examine the bidirectional interaction between industrial structure and green development. The main findings were as follows: (1) The industrial structure across the Yangtze River Delta advanced toward greater sophistication and rationality, yet intra-regional disparities remained pronounced. Shanghai, southern Jiangsu, northern Zhejiang and a handful of cities in Anhui simultaneously improved both the rationalization and sophistication of their industrial structures, whereas other areas lagged substantially. (2) Overall green-development performance in the Yangtze River Delta became better, but the trajectories diverged between steady ascents and fluctuating progress. Shanghai and the provincial capitals had sustained improvements, while Anhui exhibited greater volatility and was at consistently lower levels. Technological advancement emerged as the primary constraint on further green-development gains in the region. (3) Industrial-structure optimization and green development exhibited a dynamic pattern of “short-term inhibition, long-term synergy.” Both processes displayed significant self-reinforcement. Notably, the rationalization of industrial structure explained a larger share of the forecast-error variance in green development than the sophistication dimension. These conclusions provided scientific guidance for high-quality, coordinated development in the Yangtze River Delta and offered theoretical support for exploring win-win pathways of integrating economic growth with ecological improvement.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!