长江流域资源与环境 >> 2004, Vol. 13 >> Issue (3): 212-217.

• 资源环境与社会经济可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

西昌市生态空间占用及其生态系统安全评估

方一平(1,2), 陈国阶(1)   

  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2004-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 方一平

APPRAISAL OF ECOSYSTEM SECURITY AND ECOLOGICAL APPROPRIATION IN XICHANG

FANG Yi-ping(1,2),CHEN Guo-jie(1)   

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2004-05-20
  • Contact: FANG Yi-ping

摘要: 生态系统安全的概念应该与人类的可持续发展联系在一起,其安全的目标在于为人类的生存和发展提供持续和良好的生态服务功能,在这一意义上,生态安全就是生态系统的可持续性。生态系统安全是新兴的生态系统管理学概念,是新的环境管理和生态系统管理目标。利用生态占用分析方法,对西昌市整个生态系统的生态盈亏和生态系统安全进行评估,得出西昌市目前人均生态赤字0.6 hm2和生态安全受到挑战的结论。并进行了生态占用的敏感性分析:能源资源消耗降低10%,人均生态赤字降低5.32%;产量因子提高10%,人均生态赤字降低14.01%;能源消耗减低10%,同时产量因子提高10%,人均生态空间赤字减少降低19.33%。指出了能源循环利用、资源节约、技术革新和单位面积资源增值等为主要特征的生态产业发展对生态系统保育的意义和效应。

关键词: 生态盈亏, 生态占用, 生态系统安全, 敏感性

Abstract: Ecosystem security is associated with sustainable development, the function of ecosystem security lies in supplying ecological service for human being. An attempt is made to assess the sustainability of ecosystem in various aspects of environmental degradation during the next few decades. Ecological appropriation as a tool for ecosystem security and sustainability assessment is widely used. The ecological appropriation presents a sample framework for national or regional natural capital accounting. In this paper, security and carrying capacity of ecosystem in Xichang, Sichuan, China was analyzed based on the theory of Ecological Appropriation. Analysis illustrates that the carrying capacity of ecological footprint is only 0.8 hm\+2, ecological deficit is per capita 0.6 hm\+2, the security of ecosystem is threatened due to resource exploitation dependence on local resource absolutely in Xichan; sensitivity analysis shows that the ecological footprint per capita will decrease 2.21%, ecological deficit per capita decrease 5.32%, while energy consumption decrease 10%; biocarrying capacity per capita will increase 9.92%, ecological deficit per capita will decrease \{14.01%,\} while agricultural output increase 10%. In this context, the goal of enhancing ecosystem health and stability through ecoindustry development forms effective and important measure. Development of ecoindustry is an essential tool for decreasing ecological deficit from the local level to regional level.

Key words: ecological surplus and deficit, ecological appropriation, ecosystem security, sensitivity analysis

[1] 任娟, 王建力, 杨平恒, 詹兆君, . 亚高山旅游景区岩溶地下水水化学动态变化及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2548-2557.
[2] 曹先磊, 张颖, 石小亮, 单永娟. 竹子造林CCER项目碳汇价值动态评估及敏感性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 247-256.
[3] 史超, 夏军, 佘敦先, 万蕙, 黄金凤. 气候变化下汉江上游林地植被生态需水量的时空演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 580-589.
[4] 田玲玲, 罗静, 董莹, 刘和涛, 曾菊新. 湖北省生态足迹和生态承载力时空动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 316-325.
[5] 向灵芝, 李泳, 陈洪凯, 苏凤环, 黄晓. 基于流域演化的泥石流敏感性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1984-1992.
[6] 刘超琼, 彭开丽, 陈红蕾. 安徽省土地利用变化下的生态敏感性时空规律[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1584-1590.
[7] 吴松, 安裕伦, 马良瑞. 城市化背景下喀斯特流域生态服务价值时空分异特征——以贵阳市南明河流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1591-1598.
[8] 杨世凡, 安裕伦, 王培彬, 马良瑞, 胡锋, 孙泉忠. 贵州赤水河流域生态红线区划分研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1405-1411.
[9] 罗, 俊| 王克林, 陈洪松, 张, 伟. 桂西北喀斯特地区水土流失敏感性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(6): 579-.
[10] 吴后建,王学雷,宁龙梅,芦云峰. 土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响——以武汉市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 185-190.
[11] 何易平, 马泽忠, 谢 洪, 钟敦伦. 长江上游地区不同土地利用方式对山地灾害的敏感性分析——以金沙江一级支流小江流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 528-533.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!