长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (11): 2548-2557.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201811016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

亚高山旅游景区岩溶地下水水化学动态变化及其影响因素

任娟1,2, 王建力1,2*, 杨平恒1,2, 詹兆君1,2   

  1. (1. 西南大学地理科学学院,岩溶环境重庆市重点实验室,重庆 400715;
    2. 国土资源部岩溶生态环境重庆南川野外基地,重庆 408435
  • 出版日期:2018-11-20 发布日期:2018-12-14

Geochemical Variation and Its Influence Factors in A Karst Tourist Attraction of Subalpine Area of Chongqing

REN Juan1, 2, WANG Jianli1, 2, YANG Pingheng1, 2, ZHAN Zhaojun1, 2   

  1. (1.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Karst Environment, School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China;
    2. Field Scientific Observation & Research Base of Karst Ecoenvironments at Nanchuan in Chongqing,Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China, Chongqing 408435, China
  • Online:2018-11-20 Published:2018-12-14

摘要:  岩溶地下水是岩溶区重要的水资源,因岩溶水文系统具有敏感性和脆弱性,其一旦遭受污染便很难再恢复。以重庆亚高山金佛山水房泉为例,通过计算2008年和2016年各水化学参数的浓度增降幅度和地球化学敏感性指数,对比分析各水化学参数及其地球化学敏感性变化特征。结果表明:水房泉水化学类型为Ca-HCO3型,受水岩作用控制。旅游活动产生的生活污水自2013年起被分成两条管道,住宿排污经过泉域内化粪池的沉淀降解后排入地下,使得2016年水房泉中K+、Na+、PO43-浓度较2008年降低,显示化粪池对污染物具有有效的调节作用;而餐饮排污未经处理仍直接排入地下,导致流域出口水房泉中Cl -、NO3-浓度呈翻倍增长,水质恶化。污水还加剧了碳酸盐岩的溶蚀,地下水中HCO3-、Ca2+、Mg2+浓度上升。由于旅游高峰期与非高峰期的游客量差距逐渐缩小,2016年各化学组分的敏感性指数多低于2008年,地下水受旅游活动影响的时间变长;分别对比不同水文年各主量组分的敏感性指数大小和离子当量浓度大小,发现2008年两者排序基本一致,而2016年较为混乱,这可能表明研究区地下水系统逐渐从有序转向无序的状态,稳定性被破坏,熵值增大。

关键词: 岩溶地下水, 水化学, 地球化学敏感性, 旅游活动, 水房泉

Abstract: Karst groundwater is one of the crucial water resources to karst area. Because of its sensitivity and vulnerability, the karst hydrology system is difficult to recover once it is polluted. In this study, by taking the Shuifang spring of Jinfo Moutanin in Chongqing as an example, the variation of hydro chemical parameters and its geochemical sensitivity in 2008 and 2016 were compared and analyzed. Results indicated that groundwater in study area was controlled by waterrock interaction and characterized by Ca-HCO3 type. The sewage from tourism activities has been divided into accommodation and kitchen sewage since 2013. The former was discharged into underground after precipitation and degradation of septic tank, which made concentrations of K+, Na+, PO43- reduced in 2016 compared with 2008. This reveals the effective regulation role of septic tank to contaminant. However, unprocessed sewage from accommodation was directly recharged the karst aquifer, increasing the concentrations of Cl-, NO3- and deteriorating the groundwater quality. Meanwhile, the concentrations of HCO3-, Ca2+, Mg2+ elevated due to the dissolution of carbonate rock. In addition, because the tourist numbers in peak and offpeak was narrowing, the geochemical susceptivity indices of chemical parameters in 2016 were generally lower than 2008, and the time of groundwater influenced by tourism activities was longer. The geochemical susceptivity index of chemical parameters was largely consistent with normal concentration in 2008, but was disorderly in 2016. It maybe indicates that the groundwater system in study area gradually turned from order to disorder, with a destroyed stability and elevated entropy.

Key words: karst groundwater, hydrochemistry, geochemical susceptivity, tourism activities, Shuifang spring

[1] 尹继清, 范弢, 晏朋. 滇东南峰林湖盆区表层岩溶泉水化学动态变化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 747-754.
[2] 张岩, 付昌昌, 毛磊, 龚绪龙, 李向全. 江苏盐城地区地下水水化学特征及形成机理[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 598-605.
[3] 侯祎亮, 安艳玲, 吴起鑫, 吴旌滔, 黄娟, 段少琼, 刘霄. 贵州省三岔河流域水化学特征及其控制因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(07): 1121-1128.
[4] 韩志伟 刘丛强 吴 攀 汪福顺 王宝利 李思亮 灌 瑾. 大坝拦截对河流水溶解组分化学组成的影响分析——以夏季乌江渡水库为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 361-.
[5] 李俊云,李林立,谢世友,李廷勇,李元庆. 人类活动对川东平行岭谷区岩溶地下水化学性质季节变化的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 514-514.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陈振杰, 李满春, 刘永学. 基于GIS的桐庐县农村居民点空间格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 180 .
[2] 桑连海,陈 进. 长江流域的节水形势及发展方向[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 10 -13 .
[3] 张镀光,王克林,陈洪松,李 新,王书功. 基于DEM的地形指数提取方法及应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 715 -719 .
[4] 付晓辉, 肖刚, 姜玉印, 高亮. 近53年宜昌市霾的演变特征及气象因子诊断[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 164 .
[5] 刘敏, 杨宏青, 向华, 许杨, 史瑞琴, 刘志雄, 高正旭. 湖北省2009年冬末连阴雨过程特点及影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(7): 826 .
[6] 杨永兴, 刘长娥, 杨杨, 李珂. 长江河口九段沙上沙湿地芦苇与土壤之间营养元素的灰色关联分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(11): 1294 .
[7] 肖建红 |陈东景 |徐 敏 |于庆东. 围填海工程的生态环境价值损失评估——以江苏省两个典型工程为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(10): 1248 .
[8] 张方方 |齐述华 |廖富强 |张起明. 鄱阳湖湿地出露草洲分布特征的遥感研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(11): 1361 .
[9] 沈陈华. 丹阳市宅基地使用权流转意愿的影响因素及相互作用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(05): 552 .
[10] 叶懿安, 朱继业,李升峰, 徐秋辉. 长三角城市工业碳排放及其经济增长关联性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(03): 257 .