长江流域资源与环境 >> 2010, Vol. 19 >> Issue (7): 808-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

喀斯特生态治理区可持续发展能力评价——以贵州毕节鸭池、遵义龙坪、沿河淇滩示范区为例

罗娅1| 熊康宁2*| 陈起伟2| 龙成昌3| 顾再柯4| 魏鹏2   

  1. (1.贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院| 贵州 贵阳 550001; 2.贵州师范大学中国南方喀斯特研究院| 贵州 贵阳 550001; 
    3.贵州省植物园| 贵州 贵阳 550004; 4.贵州省水土保持监测站| 贵州 贵阳 550002)
  • 出版日期:2010-07-20

EVALUATION ON DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY OF ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT OF KARST AREAS——TAKING THE YACHI DEMONSTRATION AREA IN BIJIE CITY| LONGPING DEMONSTRATION AREA IN ZUNYI CITY| QITAN DEMONSTRATION AREA IN YANHE COUNTY| AS EXAMPLES

LUO Ya1| XIONG Kangning2| HEN Qiwei2| LONG Chengchang3| GU Zaike4| WEI Peng2
    

  1. (1.College of Geography and Environmental Science|Guizhou Normal University| Guiyang 550001| China; 
    2.Institute of South China Karst| Guizhou Normal University| Guiyang 550001| China; 
    3.Guizhou Botanical Garden| Guiyang 550004| China; 
    4.Guizhou Provincial Mornitoring Station of Soil and Water Conservation| Guiyang 550002| China)
  • Online:2010-07-20

摘要:

为检验喀斯特生态治理区的治理效果,以贵州省毕节鸭池、遵义龙坪、沿河淇滩3个示范区为例,从资源承载力、环境支持力、人口发展与支持能力、经济发展能力、社会发展能力5个方面,选择45个单项指标,建立评价指标体系,采用“纵横向”拉开档次动态综合评价法,评价3个示范区2005、2007年的可持续发展能力。结果显示:空间上看,龙坪示范区的可持续发展能力最好,鸭池示范区次之,淇滩示范区最差;时间上对比,龙坪示范区和淇滩示范区的发展能力2007年比2005年有所提高,〖JP2〗鸭池示范区稍有退步。根据各示范区的主要人地矛盾,提出控制人口、优化配置水土资源、加大林牧产业比重等对策,以提高其可持续发展能力,并为同类地区的可持续发展提供借鉴。

Abstract:

In order to test the governance effectiveness of ecological management district of karst areas,taking Yachi demonstration area in Bijie City,Longping demonstration area in Zunyi City,Qitan demonstration area in Yanhe County,Guizhou Province as examples,45 factors were chosen to build evaluation index system from five aspects including resources carrying capacity,environmental sustaining power,population development sustainability,economic development ability and social development ability,and using “vertical and horizontal” method,the development sustain abilities of the three demonstration areas in 2005 and 2007 were evaluated.The results showed that:From contrasting space,the development sustainability of Longping demonstration area was the best of all,followed by Yachi demonstration area,but Qitan demonstrationarea was the worst;From contrasting time,while the development sustainability of Yachi demonstration area was showed slightly backward,the Longping demonstration area and Qitan demonstration area were improved in 2007 than in 2005.Aim at the humanland conflicts of the three ecological management districts,the article presented some contermesures to enhance its development sustainability,such as populationcontrol,optimal allocation of land and water resources,enlarge the forestry and animal husbandry proportion and so on,and provided the model on sustainable development for the similar karst area.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[3] 吕东亮. 汉江水质优于长江的原因刍议[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 102 -104 .
[4] 彭刚华,黄良英. 长江水质评价和预测模型探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 77 -82 .
[5] 张 雷,吴映梅. 长江干流地区区域发展与国家工业化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 633 -637 .
[6] 魏 伟,周 婕,许 峰. 大城市边缘区土地利用时空格局模拟——以武汉市洪山区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 174 -179 .
[7] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[8] 李友辉,董增川,孔琼菊. 廖坊水利工程对抚河流域生态承载力的影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 148 .
[9] 张代钧,许丹宇,任宏洋,曹海彬,郑 敏,刘惠强. 长江三峡水库水污染控制若干问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 605 -610 .
[10] 刘丛强 汪福顺 王雨春 王宝利. 河流筑坝拦截的水环境响应——来自地球化学的视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 384 .