长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (07): 1006-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201407016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

川西亚高山植被恢复过程中的土壤和地被物水源涵养能力评价

陈礼清,孙泽平,李德文,黄俊忠   

  1. (1.四川农业大学林学院,四川 雅安625014;2.旺苍县林业和园林局,四川 旺苍628200;3. 四川省林业调查规划院,四川 成都610081;4.雪宝顶国家级自然保护区,四川 平武622550
  • 出版日期:2014-07-20

WATERHOLDING CAPACITY OF SOIL AND GROUND COVER FOLLOWING ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION IN SUBALPINE CONIFEROUS FOREST ZONE,WESTERN SICHUAN PROVINCE

CHEN Liqing1,SUN Zeping2,LI Dewen3,HUANG Junzhong4   

  1. (1.College of Forestry,Sichuan Agricultural University,Ya’an 625014,China; 2.Wangcang Bureau of Forestry and Landscape, Wangcang 628200,China; 3.Sichuan Institute of Forest Inventory and Plan,Chengdu 610081,China; 4.Xuebaoding National Nature Reserve,Pingwu 622550,China
  • Online:2014-07-20

摘要:

运用以空间代替时间,以糙野青茅草地、柳树灌丛、白桦林、混交林、冷杉林为植物自然恢复的序列,采用环刀法和实地调查-水浸法研究了川西亚高山植被恢复过程中土壤和地被物的持水能力。结果表明:土壤容重随深度增加而加大、随植被恢复而降低;土壤持水能力随深度增加而降低、随植被恢复而增加,表现为混交林>冷杉林>柳树灌丛>白桦林>草地;地被物储量及其持水能力随植被恢复极显著增加,其组成由草地的凋落物为主到冷杉林时以苔藓为主;生态系统土壤和地被物的持水能力随着恢复而显著提高,表现为混交林>冷杉林>柳树灌丛>白桦林>草地。因此,亚高山植被自然恢复能显著增加区域生态系统的土壤和地被物持水,适度增加阔叶树亦有利于促进川西亚高山恢复植被的土壤持水

Abstract:

Forest ecosystems play an important role in water conservation.The ecosystems of subalpine coniferous forest zone in western Sichuan Province (SCFZ) play an important role in water conservation for China.In the last decades,the explosive hydropower exploitation of western Sichuan Province has been developed on the large rivers,and the 〖JP〗trend would be continued for a long time because of  the high electricity demand.However,fewer study focused on the ecosystem waterholding of SCFZ.After the devastating floods of 1998,China launched the Natural Forest Protection Project,and we also need to know whether it is conducive to enhancing ecosystem water conservation.Therefore,we evaluated the potential waterholding capacities of soils and ground covers of five typical restoration vegetation in Wanglang National Natural Reserve in the upstream of Shuiniujia Hydropower Station of Fujiang River,western Sichuan Province.Using the method of replacing space with time,five typical restoration ecosystems of grassland (dominated by Deyeuxia scabrescens),shrub (dominated by Salix paraqplesia),broadleaf forest (dominated by Betula platyphylla),mixed forest (dominated by Betula spp.and Abies faxoniana),and the climax forest (dominated by Abies faxoniana) were selected to quantify the waterholding capacity of soil and ground cover (litter and moss) in SCFZ.The results indicated as follows. (1) The soil bulk density increased with the depth and decreased with vegetation restoration,and the trend was mixed forestclimax forest>shrub>broadleaf forest>grassland.Furthermore,the drainability of broadleaf forest was stronger than else because of stronger grazing disturbance.(4) Following the vegetation restoration,the storage of ground cover increased from 800±146 t·hm-2 at the grass to 4528±772 t·hm-2 at the climax forest,the waterholding capacity of ground cover increased 〖JP+1〗from 2856±598 t·hm-2 at the grass to 19768±4383 t·hm-2 at the climax forest,and the composition of ground cover changed from the litter at the grass to moss at the climax forest,respectively.(5) As for the total waterholding capacity of soil and ground cover at the ecosystem scale,it increased largely with the vegetation restoration,and the trend was mixed forest > climax forest> shrub > broadleaf forest>grassland.The waterholding capacity of ground cover was far less than that of the soil in all the studied ecosystems.However,the ground cover could increase the soil water retention through improving soil physical characteristics,and such effect in mixed forest was significantly better than elsewhere.In conclusion,the present paper highlighted that vegetation restoration could significantly increase the waterholding capacity of soil and ground cover at both ecosystem and regional scales.Furthermore,this paper pointed out that moderately introduced broadleaf to the restoration vegetation and reducing human disturbance would be beneficial to the ecosystem water conservation of SCFZ

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[2] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[3] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[4] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[5] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[6] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[7] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[8] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .
[9] 罗璐琴, 周敬宣, 李湘梅. 生态足迹动态预测模型构建与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 440 .
[10] 刘德富,黄钰铃,| 王从锋,. 水工学的发展趋势——从传统水工学到生态水工学[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 92 -96 .