长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (08): 1097-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201408008

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

青虾池塘养殖环境效率分析

陆建珍,邢丽荣,袁新华,徐翔   

  1. (1.南京农业大学经济管理学院,江苏 南京 210095; 2.中国水产科学研究院淡水渔业研究中心,江苏 无锡 214081)
  • 出版日期:2014-08-20

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF FRESHWATER PONDFARMING FRESHWATER SHRIMP

LU Jianzhen1, XING Lirong1, YUAN Xinghua2, XU Xiang1   

  1. (1.College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;
    2.Freshwater Fisheries Research Center of Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Wuxi 214081, China)
  • Online:2014-08-20

摘要:

为以环境友好型效率标准合理引导青虾池塘养殖生产活动,将淡水养殖对环境的影响纳入效率研究的范畴,以青虾池塘养殖为例,分别运用SBM模型和CCR模型,计算了青虾池塘养殖的环境效率和经济效率,以及各投入要素的使用情况。并运用相关分析、配对样本T检验和方差齐次性检验等技术进行比较研究。研究结果表明:当前我国青虾池塘养殖的环境效率(考虑环境因素的经济效率)仅为0476 9,而传统的经济效率(不考虑环境因素的经济效率)为0696 7,前者显著低于后者,且波动性更强。所有的要素投入都存在过量现象。除电费、虾苗和药物投入外,其他各项投入在环境效率中的过量程度均大于经济效率;具有固定成本性质的投入品,如劳动力投入和机械投入的过量程度更为严重;利用率过低致使肥料投入过量程度高于饲料投入。农户资源配置过程中忽视环境成本是根本原因,应引起高度重视

Abstract:

In order to properly guide production activities of the pondfarming freshwater shrimp by the environmentally friendly efficiency standard, employing Slacksbased Model (SBM model) and CCR model, this paper took the impact of freshwater aquaculture on water quality into consideration, calculated the usages of all inputs, environmental efficiency and economic efficiency and compared the results by correlation analysis, paired sample t test and homogeneity test of variance. The SBM model was proved to be the best method to measure the environmental efficiency, because it could solve problems of weak disposability, restriction of convexity and slackness. The input elements of freshwater shrimp farming consisted of land rent, young shrimp, feed, fertilizer, electricity, drug, labor and machines. The desired outputs were the yield of adult shrimps and the nitrogen and the undesired outputs were phosphorus discharged. The undesired outputs were calculated based on balance principle of the material. The analysis was based on 183 decision making units engaged in pure freshwater shrimp pond farming in Jiangsu Province listed as the first province of freshwater farming. The results showed that environmental efficiency of pondfarming freshwater shrimp (economic efficiency including environmental cost) was only 0476 9 with 31 decision making units on the efficient frontier, while traditional economic efficiency (economic efficiency exclusive of environmental cost) was 0.6967. They were significantly positively correlated with similar distributions, but the former was significantly lower than the latter and appeared stronger volatility. Therefore, compared with economic efficiency, it was harder to reach the frontier of environmental efficiency through controlling the freshwater shrimp farming elements. The fundamental reason was the ignorance of environmental cost in farmersresources allocation,because farmers were economic men, they cared about the personal shortterm economic benefits rather than the environmental protection or the longterm development of industry that has the nature of public products. Therefore, environment impact should be taken seriously. All the inputs were excessively used. There were diseconomies of scale in freshwater shrimp pond farming. The overuse rates of the inputs in the two efficiencies were quite different. Apart from electricity, young shrimp cost and drug cost, the overuse rates of other inputs in environmental efficiency were higher than those in economic efficiency, especially labor and machine input, which have the nature of fixed cost. Lower utilization rate resulted in more excessive fertilizer input than feed input. The overused rate of young shrimp input was higher in economic efficiency than that in environmental efficiency. Raising the breeding density could not improve the economic efficiency greatly

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李崇明,黄真理. 三峡水库入库污染负荷研究(Ⅱ)——蓄水后污染负荷预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 97 -106 .
[2] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[3] 李 佳,李思悦,谭 香,张全发. 南水北调中线工程总干渠沿线经过河流水质评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 693 .
[4] 梅 艳, 刘友兆, 梁流涛. 基于相对承载力的区域可持续发展研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 341 .
[5] 邹丽敏, 王 超, 冯士龙. 玄武湖沉积物中重金属污染的潜在生物毒性风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 280 .
[6] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[7] 陈 爽,王 进,. 太湖流域城市化水平及外来人口影响测评[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 524 -529 .
[8] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[9] 张文广,胡远满, 刘 淼,杨兆平,常 禹,李秀珍,杨 孟,问青春, . 基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值损益估算——以岷江上游地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 821 .
[10] 李贵祥,孟广涛,方向京,郭立群,柴 勇,和丽萍,张正海. 云南金沙江流域主要森林植被类型分布格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 51 .