长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (12): 1729-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201412013

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

流域气候变化和人类活动对长江径流量影响的辨识

张晓娅,杨世伦   

  1. (华东师范大学河口海岸学国家重点实验室,上海 200062)
  • 出版日期:2014-12-20

CLIMATIC AND ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACTS ON WATER DISCHARGE IN THE YANGTZE RIVER OVER THE LAST 56 YEARS (1956-2011)

ZHANG Xiaoya,YANG Shilun   

  1. (State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)
  • Online:2014-12-20

摘要:

利用1956~2011年的流域气温、降水量、径流量及有关文献所载蒸发量、水库修建、用水量、水土保持等资料,探讨气候变化和人类活动对长江径流量的影响。结果表明:(1)流域气温明显上升,且上升速率大于全球平均上升速率;(2)流域平均降水量下降了约1%,年降水量与年均气温之间无显著相关性;(3)年径流量随降水量频繁振荡,最大和最小值之比达19;(4)太阳净辐射量和风速下降导致流域自然蒸发作用减弱,而水库修建、耗水增多和水土保持等人类活动则使蒸发作用加强。两方面的影响相互削弱;入海年径流量下降1%;(5)流域内分区间存在差异,北域(岷江、嘉陵江和汉江)人类活动的影响居主导地位,径流量下降约15%;中域(金沙江以下干流两翼“未测区”)则以气候变化的影响占优,径流量上升约9%;西域(金沙江流域)径流量减少4%;南域(乌江、洞庭湖和鄱阳湖流域)径流量上升2%。推断今后几十年气候要素仍将主导径流量的年际波动,而南水北调、新建水库、耗水增多和水土保持加强将可能使径流量再下降约10%

Abstract:

This paper aims to investigate the climatic and anthropogenic impacts on the Yangtze River water discharge over the last six decades. We analyzed the time series of annual temperature, precipitation, evaporation and water discharge, employing the means of MannKendall and regression methods, in combination with data of reservoir construction, water consuming, and water and soil conservation. The results are as follows. (1) From 1956 to 2011, the catchmentaveraged annual temperature significantly increased, at a rate greater than the level of global average. (2) No significant trend was found for the catchmentaveraged annual precipitation, and therefore the annual precipitation was not well related to the annual temperature. (3) No significant trend was found for the catchmentwide actual evaporation (i.e. the difference between precipitation and runoff), although a significant decreasing trend was found for the catchmentwide annual pan evaporation. (4) Interannual changes in annual precipitation and water discharge were frequent and significant. For the whole Yangtze River Basin, the maximum annual precipitation was 1.4 times greater than the minimum annual precipitation, and the maximum annual discharge was 1.9 times greater than the minimum annual discharge. The correlation between annual precipitation and water discharge was very significant (R2 = 0.78). (5) No statistically significant trend was found for the annual water discharge of the Yangtze River, although the water discharge decreased by 3% from the initial decade (1956-1965) to the recent decade (2002-2011). (6) Spatial changes in climatic and anthropogenic impacts on water discharge were found within the Yangtze River Basin. A significant decreasing trend in annual water discharge was found for the North Area (Minjiang, Jialingjiang and Hanjiang tributaries), and a significant increasing trend in annual water discharge was found for the Centre Area (the “ungauged area” along the main river below the Jinshajiang), whereas no significance was found for the other subareas. Compared with the initial decade, the water discharge of the recent decade decreased by 14% in the North Area and decreased by 4% in the West Area, whereas it increased by 7% in the Central Area. The significant decreasing trend in water discharge in the North Area was attributable mainly to human activities (e.g. watersoil conservation projects and reservoir construction). On the other hand, the significant increasing trend in water discharge in the Centre Area was most probably due to the decrease in evaporation which was presumed attributed to decreases in net solar radiation and wind speed. These two aspects of influencing factors, anthropogenic and climatic, have opposite effect on actual evaporation, and therefore offset each other in affecting the whole Yangtze River water discharge. This study suggests that anthropogenic and climatic impacts on water discharge, even though they could be separately significant, could cancel each other in some rivers and during some periods. We predict that human activities will be the dominant factor influencing the water discharge in the Yangtze River in the coming decades. Under the influences of the South to North Water Diversion, construction of new reservoirs, increasing water consuming and watersoil conservation, the decadal water discharge will probably decrease by 10% by the end of this century, compared with the present level

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[2] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[3] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[4] 程 江,何 青,王元叶,刘 红,夏小明. 长江河口细颗粒泥沙絮凝体粒径的谱分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 460 -464 .
[5] 彭 建,景 娟,吴健生,蒋依依,张 源. 乡村产业结构评价——以云南省永胜县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 413 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 蔡述明. 研究长江中游地区水资源开发利用的新成果[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 100 .
[9] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[10] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .