长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (03): 408-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201503009

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江口潮间带湿地涨退潮期N2O的排放通量研究

李杨杰, 陈振楼, 王初, 胡泓   

  1. (1.华东师范大学资源与环境科学学院,上海 200062; 2.上海师范大学旅游学院,上海 200234)
  • 出版日期:2015-03-20

EXCHANGE FLUXES OF N2O BETWEEN INTERTIDAL WETLANDS AND  ATMOSPHERE DURING THE LOW AND HIGH TIDES IN YANGTZE ESTUARY

LI Yangjie1, CHEN Zhenlou1, WANG Chu2, HU Hong1   

  1. (1.School of Resources and Environment Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China;2.School of Urban and Tourism, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
  • Online:2015-03-20

摘要:

随着河口区接收上游人为氮排放量的增加,为这一区域氧化亚氮(N2O)的排放增加了很大不确定性。选择长江河口潮间带湿地为研究对象,分别采用原位静态箱法和静态顶空法,从2011年1月至12月对长江口沉积物大气界面以及涨潮水大气界面的N2O排放通量进行了为期一年的现场观测和研究。研究结果表明,沉积物大气界面N2O通量有着显著的时空差异。N2O排放通量在日变化以及季节变化上都表现出明显的源汇转变,就年平均排放通量,光滩带沉积物大气界面达到了599 μgN2O/(m2〖DK〗·h),而海三棱藨草盐沼带与大气间N2O交换则十分微弱,为060 μgN2O/(m2〖DK〗·h)。对长江口涨退潮期光滩和草滩上覆水体大气界面N2O排放通量的研究表明,长江口涨退潮期在夏季和秋季,无论是光滩还是草滩均表现为大气N2O的稳定排放源,其中夏季平均253 μgN2O/(m2〖DK〗·h),秋季平均排放通量为207 μgN2O/(m2〖DK〗·h)。作为河口区上游排放氮素的直接接收者,和沉积物大气界面N2O排放相比,长江口涨潮水大气界面N2O排放稳定而又显著,是长江口N2O排放的主要贡献者,应成为这一区域N2O排放的关注热点

Abstract:

As one of the most important greenhouse gases, nitrous oxide (N2O) has been recognized to contribute global warming by 25%. The Global nitrogen enrichment has resulted in increased N2O emission that greatly contributes to global warming and stratospheric ozone destruction. With the increase of upstream nitrogen importation, the uncertainties of N2O emissions also increased due to the complex nitrogen cycles in estuary area. Although some studies have already been carried out to identify the N2O emission fluxes in the Yangtze estuary, the N2O emission flux of water body during the tide movement remains unknown. From February to December 2011, we chose Yangtze estuary intertidal zone (Scripus mariqueter salt marshes and bare tidal flat) as research area to study the natural N2O fluxes between the sediment and atmosphere and also between the tide water and atmosphere during the tide movement. The sedimentair and waterair N2O fluxes were respectively measured using the static closed chamber and static headspace techniques. The study results indicated that both Scripus mariqueter salt marshes and bare tidal flat acted as net sources of atmospheric N2O at the low tide when the sediments were exposed to the air. Considering both N2O emission and absorption, the annual average N2O fluxes of sedimentair interface in Scripus mariqueter salt marshes and bare tidal flat were 060 and 599 μg N2O/(m2〖DK〗·h), respectively. N2O fluxes between the sediment and atmosphere showed large temporal variations. The transformation of N2O sink and source in both Scripus mariqueter salt marshes and bare flat appeared in different time scales including daily and monthly time scale. The fluctuation of N2O emission and absorption was probably caused by the low concentration of active inorganic nitrogen in the sediment, which brought many uncertainties to the N2O production ratio during the denitrification process. The N2O fluxes between the waterair interfaces during the processes of tide rising and ebbing showed that both Scripus mariqueter salt marshes and the bare tidal flat acted as the steady and significant emission sources of the atmospheric N2O. The average airsea fluxes of N2O in summer and autumn were 253 and 207 μgN2O/(m2〖DK〗·h), respectively. The waterair N2O fluxes didnt exhibit significant seasonal change and were also not influenced much by the ambient temperature. In terms of spatial variation, waterair N2O fluxes in Scripus mariqueter salt marshes were lower than that in bare tidal flat and the N2O fluxes were 1966 and 2588 μg N2O/(m2〖DK〗·h), respectively. In addition, the differences of waterair N2O fluxes between the diurnal tide and night tide were also not obvious, which indicated that light condition exerted little impact on waterair N2O emission. The concrete waterair N2O fluxes of the diurnal tide and night tide were 2169 and 2459 μg N2O/(m2〖DK〗·h), respectively. As the main receiver of upstream imported nitrogen, the water body in the Yangtze estuary during the tide movement acted as the more significant emission source of atmospheric N2O, thus the tide water should be paid more attention from the terms of the greenhouse gas emissions compared with the N2O fluxes from the sediment and atmosphere.〖

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 聂钠, 于坤香. 我国世界自然遗产地旅游业环境经济核算思路[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 121 .
[2] 曹银贵,王 静,程 烨,刘爱霞,许 宁,郝 银,饶彩霞. 三峡库区土地利用变化与影响因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 748 .
[3] 徐俊杰, 何 青, 刘 红, 陈吉余. 2006年长江特枯径流特征及其原因初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 716 .
[4] 游庆龙. 三江源地区1961~2005年气温极端事件变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 232 .
[5] 吴炳方,罗治敏. 基于遥感信息的流域生态系统健康评价——以大宁河流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 102 -106 .
[6] 郝红升,李克锋,李然,赵再兴. 取水口高程对过渡型水库水温分布结构的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 21 -25 .
[7] 刘承良, 田 颖, 梁 滨,5. 武汉城市圈产业经济的系统性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 1 .
[8] 伍新木,廖 丹,严 瑾. 制度创新:依托武汉建设长江中游城市群[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 1 -6 .
[9] 李翀,廖文根,彭静,叶柏生. 宜昌站1900~2004年生态水文特征变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 76 -80 .
[10] 张心怡,刘 敏,孟 飞. 基于RS和GIS的上海城建用地扩展研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 29 -33 .