基于效果-效率-适应性的养殖废弃物资源化利用管理模式评价框架构建及初步应用

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201610004

长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (10): 1501-1508.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201610004

基于效果-效率-适应性的养殖废弃物资源化利用管理模式评价框架构建及初步应用

姜海¹, 白璐¹, 雷昊¹, 赵海燕², 吴昊³

1. 南京农业大学公共管理学院, 江苏南京 210095;
2. 南京农业大学资源与环境学院, 江苏南京 210095;
3. 江苏省农业环境监测与保护站, 江苏南京 210036

收稿日期:2016-02-03 修回日期:2016-04-28 出版日期:2016-10-20
作者简介:姜海(19xx~),男,教授,博士,主要研究方向为资源经济、农村环境政策等研究.E-mail:jianghai@njau.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（编号:2012ZX07101-009），江苏省太湖水污染治理专项（编号:TH2013306）

AN EVALUATION FRAMEWORK BASED ON EFFECTIVENESS-ECONOMIC-APPLICABILITY ANALYSIS FOR MANAGEMENT MODES OF LIVESTOCK WASTE UTILIZATION

JIANG Hai¹, BAI Lu¹, LEI Hao¹, ZHAO Hai-yan², WU Hao³

1. College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;
2. College of Resource and Environmental Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;
3. Jiangsu Agricultural Environment Monitoring and Protection Station, Nanjing 210036, China

Received:2016-02-03 Revised:2016-04-28 Online:2016-10-20
Supported by:
National Water Pollution Control and Treatment Science and Technology Major Project (No.2012ZX07101-009);Jiangsu Special Fund for Taihu Water Pollution Treatment (No.TH2013306)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 由于产业发展正处于转型阶段，我国畜禽养殖污染治理中的管理问题比技术问题更加突出，选择适宜的组织管理模式尤其重要。融合了效果分析、效率评价和适应性分析，尝试构建一个养殖废弃物资源化利用管理模式综合评价框架，并选择太湖流域4个不同类型的典型案例进行方法例证。研究表明，传统的养殖企业主导型管理模式应用于小型、分散养殖废弃物资源化利用时面临着经济效率低、适应性差难题；农村废弃物处理中心、种植企业和有机肥企业的参与可以改善小型、分散养殖废弃物资源化利用的经济效率；综合考虑效果、效率与适应性，种植企业、有机肥企业主导型模式的适宜推广范围更广。应根据不同地区种植-养殖产业关系、污染治理需求、经济发展水平与政府投入能力等，灵活组合应用不同管理模式。

关键词: 养殖废弃物, 资源化利用, 管理模式, 评价方法, 案例研究

Abstract: Since China's livestock and poultry breeding industry is in a transition stage, choice and improvement of management mode for livestock waste governance is more prominent than technical problems. Effectiveness analysis, economic evaluation and applicability analysis were integrated to construct an evaluation framework for livestock waste management modes. Four typical cases presenting different livestock waste resource utilization management modes in Taihu Basin are employed to test the evaluation framework and methods. It is found that traditional livestock farm oriented management mode is faced with low economic efficiency and poor sustainability when applied to livestock waste resource utilization of small and decentralized livestock farms. Participation of disposal center for rural wastes, planting farms and organic fertilizer enterprises would improve the economic efficiency of resource utilization of waste from small and decentralized livestock farms. Planting farm oriented mode and organic fertilizer enterprise oriented mode have a wider range of applications in the case of considering effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of management. Different management modes should have a more flexible combination and application according to planting-raising situation, pollution governance needs, regional economic level and government financial capacity.

Key words: livestock waste, resource utilization, management mode, evaluation method, case study

中图分类号:

F323.22

姜海, 白璐, 雷昊, 赵海燕, 吴昊. 基于效果-效率-适应性的养殖废弃物资源化利用管理模式评价框架构建及初步应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1501-1508.

JIANG Hai, BAI Lu, LEI Hao, ZHAO Hai-yan, WU Hao. AN EVALUATION FRAMEWORK BASED ON EFFECTIVENESS-ECONOMIC-APPLICABILITY ANALYSIS FOR MANAGEMENT MODES OF LIVESTOCK WASTE UTILIZATION[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(10): 1501-1508.

参考文献

[1] 国家统计局. 第一次全国污染源普查公报[R/OL]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/qttjgb/qgqttjgh/t20100211_402621161.htm.[National Bureau of Statistics. The first national survey of pollution sources bulletin[R/OL]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/qttjgb/qgqttjgh/t20100211_402621161.htm.]
[2] 洪晓芸, 李鹏. 区域农业废弃物资源存量估算及分布差异研究[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2012, 23(5):11-14.[HONG X Y, LI P. Study on the estimation and distribution of regional agricultural waste resources[J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2012, 23(5):11-14.]
[3] 耿维, 胡林, 崔建宇, 等. 中国区域畜禽粪便能源潜力及总量控制研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(1):171-179.[GENG W, HU L, CUI J Y, et al. Biogas energy potential for livestock manure and gross control of animal feeding in region level of China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(1):171-179.]
[4] 吴景贵, 孟安华, 张振都, 等. 循环农业中畜禽粪便的资源化利用现状及展望[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2011, 33(3):237-242, 259.[WU J G, MENG A H, ZHANG Z D, et al. Present situations and prospects for resource utilization of livestock and poultry feces in recycling agriculture[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2011, 33(3):237-242, 259.]
[5] 彭绪亚, 何芸, 何清明. MAP沉淀法与超声波技术相联合对畜禽粪便的脱氮除磷效果[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2011, 27(6):78-82.[PENG X Y, HE Y, HE Q M. Effectiveness of MAP method coupled with ultrasonic technology in removing nitrogen and phosphorus from poultry feces[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2011, 27(6):78-82.]
[6] 张依然, 王仁卿, 张建, 等. 大型人工湿地生态可持续性评价[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(15):4803-4810.[ZHANG Y R, WANG R Q, ZHANG J, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem sustainability for large-scale constructed wetlands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(15):4803-4810.]
[7] 郑万城, 张勇勤. 五位一体推进水资源治理现代化——苏州市吴江区水资源治理的有益探索[J]. 中国行政管理, 2015(11):158-159.[ZHENG W C, ZHANG Y Q. Five points to advance water treatment modernization:the beneficial water treatment exploration of Wujiang district in Suzhou city[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2015(11):158-159. (请核对英文标题)]
[8] 李鹏, 张俊飚. 农业生产废弃物循环利用绩效测度的实证研究-基于三阶段DEA模型的农户基质化管理[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(4):754-761.[LI P, ZHANG J B. Empirical studies of agricultural production waste recycling efficiency-Based on peasant household substrate management with three-stage DEA model[J]. China Environmental Science, 2013, 33(4):754-761.]
[9] 宋成军, 张玉华, 李冰峰. 农业废弃物资源化利用技术综合评价指标体系与方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(11):289-293.[SONG C J, ZHANG Y H, LI B F. Comprehensive evaluation index system and method on resource utilization technology of agricultural residues[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(11):289-293.]
[10] 黄文芳, 沈哲. 农村面源污染治理的政策与管理服务体系优化——以上海郊区农村为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012, 28(5):599-604.[HUANG W F, SHEN Z. Optimization of policy and management service system on control of rural non-point source pollution:a case study of the rural area of Shanghai[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2012, 28(5):599-604.]
[11] 蔡细平. 生态公益林项目评价研究:理论、方法与实践[M]. 杭州:浙江大学出版社, 2012.[CAI X P. Research on project evaluation of ecological public welfare forests:theories, methods, practices[M]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University Press, 2012.]
[12] 姜海, 雷昊, 白璐, 等. 不同类型地区畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用管理模式选择——以江苏省太湖地区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(12):2430-2440.[JIANG H, LEI H, BAI L, et al. Regional livestock waste resource utilization management modes in the Taihu Lake Basin, Jiangsu[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(12):2430-2440.]
[13] 关劲峤, 黄贤金, 刘红明, 等. 太湖流域水环境变化的货币化成本及环境治理政策实施效果分析——以江苏省为例[J]. 湖泊科学, 2003, 15(3):275-279.[GUAN J Q, HUANG X J, LIU H M, et al. The regional currencified cost of aquatic environmental change of Taihu basin and analysis on environmental policy implemention in Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2003, 15(3):275-279.]
[14] 刘培芳, 陈振楼, 许世远, 等. 长江三角洲城郊畜禽粪便的污染负荷及其防治对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2002, 11(5):456-460.[LIU P F, CHEN Z L, XU S Y, et al. Waste Loading and Treatment Strategies on the Excreta of Domestic Animals in the Yangtze Delta[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2002, 11(5):456-460.]

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed