长江三角洲班轮公司挂靠港选择研究

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201611009

长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (11): 1704-1710.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201611009

长江三角洲班轮公司挂靠港选择研究

潘坤友¹, 曹有挥², 吴威², 梁双波², 魏鸿雁¹

1. 盐城工学院管理学院, 江苏盐城 224051;
2. 中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所, 江苏南京 210008

收稿日期:2016-03-09 修回日期:2016-07-12 出版日期:2016-11-20
通讯作者: 曹有挥,E-mail:yhcao@niglas.ac.cn E-mail:yhcao@niglas.ac.cn
作者简介:潘坤友(1979~),男,博士,主要研究方向为区域经济与港口物流.E-mail:pankunyou@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41301126，41271136）

RESEARCH ON MECHANISM OF CALLING PORT SELECTION OF LINER SHIPPING COMPANY IN YANGTZE RIVER DELTA

PAN Kun-you¹, CAO You-hui², WU Wei², LIANG Shuang-bo², WEI Hong-yan¹

1. School of Management, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, China;
2. Nanjing of Geography and Limnology, CAS, Nanjing 210008, China

Received:2016-03-09 Revised:2016-07-12 Online:2016-11-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41301126,41271136)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 20世纪90年代以来，班轮公司渐成影响港口体系演变的主导因素，班轮网络形成的内在机理成为学者们关注的热点领域。以长江三角洲为案例区，从基础设施、箱量规模、港口效率、港口费用、配套产业、扶持政策6个方面构建班轮公司挂靠港选择评价指标体系，利用多元线性回归模型，定量测度长江三角洲班轮公司挂靠港选择的影响因素。在此基础上，选取港口、班轮公司、货主和货代等港口物流节点进行访谈验证，结果显示定性分析与模型计算的结果基本吻合。箱量规模和港口费用是当前影响长江三角洲班轮公司挂靠港选择的主要因素，其次是港口基础设施与港口效率，最后是政策环境与航运配套产业，其中政策的影响越来越显著。

关键词: 班轮公司, 班轮航线, 挂靠港, 长江三角洲

Abstract: Since the 1990s, the liner shipping company has become the dominant factor of port system evolution, and the mechanism of liner network formation has become a hot research area. Taking the Yangtze River Delta as a case study area, the article builds evaluation index system of calling port selection from port infrastructure, container throughput, port efficiency, port charges, supporting industries and supporting policies. Then the paper quantitatively measures the influence factors of calling port selection in the Yangtze River Delta by using multivariate linear regression model. On this basis, the thesis verifies the results of quantitative analysis by questionnaire interviews, selecting the port logistics nodes, such as port, liner shipping company, cargo owner and freight forwarders. The results showed that qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis results are basically the same. Container throughput and port charges are the most important factors of calling port selection in the Yangtze River Delta, the secondly is port infrastructure and port efficiency, the last is policy environment and supporting industries.In recent years, the impact of policies is becoming more and more significant.

Key words: liner shipping company, liner route, port of call, the Yangtze River Delta

中图分类号:

K902

潘坤友, 曹有挥, 吴威, 梁双波, 魏鸿雁. 长江三角洲班轮公司挂靠港选择研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1704-1710.

PAN Kun-you, CAO You-hui, WU Wei, LIANG Shuang-bo, WEI Hong-yan. RESEARCH ON MECHANISM OF CALLING PORT SELECTION OF LINER SHIPPING COMPANY IN YANGTZE RIVER DELTA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(11): 1704-1710.

参考文献

[1] BROOKS M R. Sea change in liner shipping:regulation and managerial decision-making in a global industry[M]. Oxford:Pergamon Press, 2000.
[2] SLACK B, COMTOIS C, SLETMO G. Shipping lines as agents of change in the port industry[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 1996, 23(3):289-300.
[3] FRANC P, VAN DER HORST M. Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators:a theoretical and empirical analysis[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2010, 18(4):557-566.
[4] HEAVER T D. The evolving roles of shipping lines in international logistics[J]. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 2002, 4(3):210-230.
[5] OLIVIER D. Private entry and emerging partnerships in container terminal operations:evidence from Asia[J]. Maritime Economis & Logistics, 2005, 7(2):87-115.
[6] SLACK B, FRÉMONT A. Transformation of port terminal operations:from the local to the global[J]. Transport Reviews, 2005, 25(1):117-130.
[7] NOTTEBOOM T, MERCKX F. Freight integration in liner shipping:a strategy serving global production networks[J]. Growth and Change, 2006, 37(4):550-569.
[8] RIDOLFI G. Containerisation in the Mediterranean:between global ocean routeways and feeder services[J]. GeoJournal, 1999, 48(1):29-34.
[9] FLEMING D K, HAYUTH Y. Spatial characteristics of transportation hubs:centrality and intermediacy[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 1994, 2(1):3-18.
[10] TABERNACLE J B. A study of the changes in performance of quayside container cranes[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 1995, 22(2):115-124.
[11] BAIRD A J. Containerization and the decline of the upstream urban port in Europe[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 1996, 23(2):145-156.
[12] 孙敏. 集装箱班轮航线靠港选择的影响因素分析[J]. 中国储运, 2010(2):90-91.[SUN M. The analysis on influence factor of Container liner routes' calling port choice[J]. China Storage & Transport Magazine, 2010(2):90-91.]
[13] 刘可文. 区域开放开发政策对企业区位选择的影响机制研究——以长江三角洲地区为例[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学博士学位论文, 2013.[LIU K W. The research about influencing mechanism of regional opening up and development policy on enterprises' location selection-a case study on the Yangtze River delta[D]. Beijing:Doctor Dissertation of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2013.]
[14] 王成金, 金凤君. 中国海上集装箱运输的组织网络研究[J]. 地理科学, 2006, 26(4):392-401.[WANG C J, JIN F J. Organization networks of Chinese marine container transportation[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2006, 26(4):392-401.]
[15] 潘坤友, 曹有挥, 梁双波, 等. 中国集装箱多门户港口区域空间结构的形成与机理[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(2):214-222.[PAN K Y, CAO Y H, LIANG S B, et al. A study on formation and mechanism of multi-port gateway regions in the China's container port system[J]. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(2):214-222.]
[16] 曹有挥, 毛汉英, 许刚. 长江下游港口体系的职能结构[J]. 地理学报, 2001, 56(5):590-598.[CAO Y H, MAO H Y, XU G. The functional structure of the lower Changjiang River port system[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(5):590-598.]
[17] 韩增林, 安筱鹏, 王利, 等. 中国国际集装箱运输网络的布局与优化[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 57(4):479-488.[HAN Z L, AN X P, WANG L, et al. Distribution and optimization of container transportation network in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 57(4):479-488.]
[18] 徐骅, 金凤君, 王成金. 集装箱环球航线的枢纽区位优化[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(6):593-602.[XU H, JIN F J, WANG C J. Optimization of the Locations of hub-ports in round-the-world Container service[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(6):593-602.]

相关文章 15

[1]	汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1-11.
[2]	叶潇潇, 赵一飞. 基于聚类分析的长江三角洲港口群可持续发展水平评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(Z1): 17-24.
[3]	王坤, 黄震方, 曹芳东, 陈晓艳. 泛长江三角洲城市旅游经济发展的空间效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(07): 1016-1023.
[4]	温康民, 史军, 马井会. 1961~2013年长江三角洲地区霾日季节特征及变化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 621-629.
[5]	陈肖飞, 姚士谋, 张落成. 1990年以来长江三角洲耕地资源变化及驱动因子研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1521-1527.
[6]	吴国清. 上海都市旅游与长三角区域旅游的互动响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(7): 597-.
[7]	尚正永, 张小林. 长江三角洲都市连绵区城市体系的分形特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 997-.
[8]	许乃政 , 张桃林, 王兴祥, 刘红樱, 梁晓红. 长江三角洲地区土壤无机碳库研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1038-.
[9]	陈多长. 长江三角洲局部地区土壤污染的社会经济原因及其对策探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(10): 943-.
[10]	向云波,徐长乐,彭秀芬. 长江三角洲城市群循环经济发展水平的空间格局分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 661-661.
[11]	肖亚丽, 蒋大和. 长三角城市群生态城市建设定量评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 549-549.
[12]	李书恒, 郭伟, 施晓冬, 朱大奎. 舟山群岛海洋环境资源及其开发利用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 425-425.
[13]	赵言文,, 施毅超,胡正义, 牛高华\| 孙燕. 基于国家粮食安全的长江三角洲地区耕地保护探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 461-461.
[14]	王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405-405.
[15]	明玲玲,陈洪斌,张宇峰. 长江三角洲地区海相沉积物母质土壤对Cu的吸附解吸特性[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 482-482.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed