长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (8): 1150-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201708006

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

三峡库区消落带农用坡地氮素流失特征及其环境效应

姜世伟,何太蓉,汪  涛,唐家良,朱  波   

  1. (1. 重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院,重庆401331;2.中国科学院山地表生过程与生态调控重点实验室,四川 成都610041;3.中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川 成都610041)
  • 出版日期:2017-08-20

NITROGEN LOSS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS FROM SLOPING LAND USED FOR AGRICULTURE IN THE WATER LEVEL FLUCTUATION ZONE OF THE THREE GORGES RESERVOIR REGION

JIANG Shi-wei,HE Tai-rong1, WANG Tao ,TANG Jia-liang,ZHU Bo   

  1. (1.College of Geography and Tourism, Chongqing Normal University,Chongqing 401331, China;2.Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Process and Ecological Regulation, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu 610041, China; 3.Institute of Maintain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu 610041,China)
  • Online:2017-08-20

摘要: 三峡库区消落带坡地的自发农用较为常见,消落带的这种利用方式可能加剧养分流失并对库区水环境造成影响。通过对库区2011~2013年3个落干期消落带农用坡地的地表径流、壤中流中氮素形态与浓度进行定位监测,研究消落带农用坡地氮素流失特征及其环境效应。结果表明:常规施肥下,消落带农用坡地侵蚀模数为1 443 kg/(hm2·a),落干期内坡地平均径流量为230 mm,径流系数为0.58,其中壤中流流量占总径流量的77%。历次降雨产流事件中常规施肥处理时,地表径流、壤中流中TN平均浓度分别是4.85±0.85、20.73±2.05 mg/L,落干期地表径流(泥沙)和壤中流的TN流失量分别为6.63±1.19、35.22±3.38 kg/hm2,分别占当季施肥量的2.2%、11.7%。可见,随壤中流流失是三峡库区消落带农用坡地氮素流失的主要途径。与常规施肥处理相比,减量施肥处理使地表径流(泥沙)、壤中流TN流失通量分别显著降低了25%、48%,表明减少氮肥用量可以显著降低消落带农用带来的环境风险,建议消落带农用地氮肥进行减量施肥,使其既不影响作物产量,也显著降低氮流失。
关键词: 三峡水库;消落带;地表径流;壤中流;氮负荷;减量施肥

Abstract: The mechanisms of nitrogen(N) losses through runoff (both overland flow and interflow) represent a significant portion of the N  biogeochemical cycle have been well documented for purple soil in the Sichuan Basin. It is unclear, however, how nitrogenloss takes place in agricultural slop land in the zone of fluctuating water level in the Three Gorges reservoir region. Nutrient loss may be increased and bring a great impact on the water environment of the Three Gorges Reservoir area while slope lands in the water level fluctuation zone used by local farmers spontaneously. Nitrogenloss through runoff in hill slope cropland in the water level fluctuation zone is unclear without any in situ monitoring. In this paper, we presented an in situ monitoring study of nitrogen losing forms, contents and fluxes via different pathways from slope land used for farming in the in the water level fluctuation zone during drawdown period through 2011 to 2013. The results showed that soil erosion modulus of slope land used for farming would be 1 443 kg·hm-2·a-1,while average annual runoff is 229.7 mm with interflow accounting for 77% of the total runoff discharge. The average total nitrogen in water of overland flow and interflow was 4.85±0.85 mg·L-1,20.73±2.05 mg·L-1,respectively. The annual total nitrogen loss via overland flow and interflow was 6.63±1.19 and 35.22±3.38 kg·hm-2,respectively, accounting for 2.2% and 11.7% of applied N fertilizer. Nitrate loss via interflow is the dominant route of nitrogen loss from the slope cropland. Compared with conventional fertilization rate, the loadings of total nitrogen were significantly reduced by 25% and 48%, respectively, in the overland flow and interflow under N-reduction fertilization. This indicates that reducing nitrogen application rate may decrease significantly the environmental risk of N loss from the slope land used for farming in the water level fluctuation zone. The intensity of nitrogen loss on slope land cannot be neglected while the slope land for farming of water level fluctuating zone, which may have potential risk of water pollution in the reservoir area. Therefore, restoration the ecological barrier function of water level fluctuating zone plays an important role in protecting the water environment of the Three Gorges reservoir area, suggesting the measures of reducing nitrogen application rate.
Key words:Three Gorges Reservoir; water level fluctuation zone; overland flow; interflow; nitrogen loading; reducing fertilizer application

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 许峰, 祁士华, 高媛, 邢新丽. 绵阳市代表性点位土壤多环芳烃剖面分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 192 .
[2] 陶建平,雷海章. 长江中游平原农业水灾风险管理的制度建设[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 621 -625 .
[3] 郑明媚,李满春,毛 亮,黎韶光. GIS支持的县域人口迁移空间模型研究——以浙江省临安市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 281 -286 .
[4] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[5] 王红丽,| 刘 健 | 况雪源. 四种再分析资料与长江中下游地区降水观测资料的对比研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 703 .
[6] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[7] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[8] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[9] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[10] 王云琦,王玉杰,朱金兆. 重庆缙云山典型林分林地土壤抗蚀性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 775 -780 .